Comparative Study on Postoperative Analgesia With Transversus Abdominis Plane Block to Local Anesthetic Infiltration With Ropivacaine in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

August 24, 2023 updated by: Surendra Bhusal, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Nepal

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block with Local Anesthetic Infiltration of ropivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

• If Transversus Abdominis Plane block with Ropivacaine will produce long duration of analgesia than the Local Anesthetic Infiltration with ropivacaine after laparoscopic abdominal surgery .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pain is a natural phenomenon. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Pain is distressing and detrimental in post-operative patients. Management of post-operative pain has been a challenge to anesthetists. Pain treatment increase speed of recovery, minimum patient suffering, decrease length of stay, reduced hospital costs, increased patient satisfaction, increase productivity and quality of life.

Peripheral nerve blockade or field block with local anesthesia is helpful in managing postoperative pain effectively whilst avoiding complication associated with intravenous narcotics or neuraxial blockade. Regional block will help in reduction of dose and frequency of intravenous narcotics used in postoperative period, hence minimizing the side effects of narcotics.

Ultrasound guided abdominal nerve blocks are increasingly being used for anaesthesia and analgesia. The Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block that results in anesthesia of the abdominal wall. This plane represents an anatomical potential space with nerves leaving the plane to innervate the abdominal muscles and skin. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) is a novel procedure to provide postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery.

Ropivacaine has a greater degree of motor sensory differentiation. Ropivacaine has been safely used up to the dose of 200 mg (100 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine) as a field block for post operative analgesia. We are giving a larger volume of ropivacaine (20 ml on each side) expecting to cover the upper abdomen when TAP block is performed via posterior approach.

NULL HYPOTHESIS There is no difference in post operative analgesia with Transversus Abdominis Plane block and local anesthetic infiltration after laparoscopicabdominal surgery

General objective

1. To compare the efficacy of Transversus Abdominal plane block and local anesthetic infiltration after laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Specific objective

  1. To compare the visual analog score (VAS) between two groups
  2. To compare time to first analgesic requirement between two groups.
  3. To compare the total dose of analgesia in 24 hours between the two groups

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bagmati
      • Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal, 977
        • National Academy of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients of either sex aged 25-70 years
  2. ASA physical status I or II
  3. Patient posted for elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any absolute contraindications to peripheral nerve blockade
  2. History of Hypersensitivity to Drugs
  3. Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus, Renal Failure, Hepatic failure
  4. History of neuromuscular or psychiatric disease
  5. Patient receiving psychotropic drug, chronic analgesic therapy
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Patient weight less than 50 kg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I
Transversus Abdominis Plane block
This group received 20ml of Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution in bilateral transversus abdominis plane at the end of surgery
Experimental: Group II
Local infiltration
This group received local infiltration of 20ml of Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solutionat port sites at the end of surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
Visual analog scale at rest
Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of analgesia
Time Frame: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
Visual analog scale on movement
Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
The time of first complaint of pain by the patient.
Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
Total pethidine consumption
Time Frame: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
At any point of time when VAS was>3, injection pethidine 0.5 mg/kg and injection promethazine 0.25 mg/kg was given via intravenous route
Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
Total ketorolac consumption
Time Frame: Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention
When pain persisted for more than 15 min after giving intravenous pethidine, injection ketorolac 30 mg intravenous was given
Time Frame: upto first 24 hour after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Surendra Bhusal, MD, NAMS Bir Hospital
  • Study Director: Brihaspati K C, MD, NAMS Bir Hospital
  • Study Chair: Kaushal Tamang, MD, NAMS Bir Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine in Transversus abdominis plane

3
Subscribe