- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06018909
The Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Package on Procedural Pain and Anxiety in Children
August 30, 2023 updated by: Aynur Aytekin Ozdemir
The Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Package on Peripheral Venous Cannulation Pain and Anxiety in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study investigated the effect of cognitive-behavioral interventions package (CBIP) on pain and anxiety related to peripheral venous cannulation (PVC) in children aged 7-12 years.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The International Guide to Pediatric Anesthesia (Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain) recommends pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods to effectively manage and prevent acute procedural pain in children.
Nonpharmacological methods alone or in combination with pharmacological methods help reduce pain, and therefore, have become popular especially in recent years.
For pain management, nonpharmacological methods are easy to use, and cost- and time-effective methods with no side effects.
Studies have evaluated a large number of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for procedural pain management in children.
However, most of those interventions are not used by healthcare professionals because they are expensive, time-consuming or hard to use.
Therefore, easy-to-use, practical, non-invasive, cost-effective, and reusable nonpharmacological methods can be used especially in acute settings.
Cognitive-behavioral interventions, one of the non-pharmacological methods used to minimize pain and anxiety related to painful medical procedures in children are promising.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Kadıköy
-
Istanbul, Kadıköy, Turkey, 34720
- İstanbul medeniyet University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- being between the ages of 7 to 12 years
- be literate
- requiring peripheral venous cannulation procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- had chronic diseases
- had neuro-developmentally delayed
- had visual, audio, or speech impairments
- were hospital stay for treatment in the past three years
- had a history of sedative, analgesic or narcotic use within 24 hours before procedure
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions Package Group
Participants received CBIP.
CBIP included procedural preparation and information, distraction, suggestions, parent training and positive reinforcement.
|
CBIP was developed by researchers in line with the relevant literature according to the developmental characteristics of children.
Opinions were obtained from experts in the field of pediatrics or psychiatric nursing regarding CBIP.
CBIP consisted of cognitive and behavioral practices to prevent/reduce procedural pain and anxiety.
|
No Intervention: Control
The control group received the routine peripheral venous cannulation procedure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual Analog Scale: VAS
Time Frame: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
The VAS is used to measure and monitor pain intensity.
VAS is a 10 cm or 100 mm long horizontal or vertical line with anchor statements "no pain or pain at its least" at the left-most end and "unbearable pain or worst pain imaginable" at the right-most end.
The participant is asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their pain level.
The VAS score is determined by measuring the distance of the mark from the left end of the line.
VAS is an easy-to-understand and easy-to-measure scale for children aged 7 and over.
|
Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale: WB-FACES
Time Frame: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
The scale is used to diagnose pain in children aged 3-18 years.
It consists of six facial expressions, each one representing an increasing degree of pain scored on a scale 0 to 5 from left to right.
The first face is a happy face representing "no pain=0" while the last face is a crying face representing "the worst pain imaginable=5".
Higher scores indicate low pain tolerance.
Participants are asked to choose the facial expression that best represents their pain.
|
Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
Children's Fear Scale: CFS
Time Frame: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
The CFS was developed to measure fear and anxiety in children.
It consists of five facial expressions that represent a range from neutral to extreme fear.
It is scored between 0 and 4. Both researchers and family members can use the CFS to measure fear and anxiety in children before and during procedures.
|
Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children-State Form (STAIC-State)
Time Frame: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
STAIC was designed as a research tool for the study of anxiety in 9- to 12-year-old children as well as in younger or older children depending on their reading ability.
The widely used STAIC-State Form includes 20-item self-report scale situational variation.
In the STAIC-State Form, the children were asked to evaluate how they felt "that moment" and mark one of the relevant choices.
When the presence of these feelings is stated as "much" by the child, the highest score is 3; and when it is not stated, the lowest score is 1.
|
Through painful procedure completion, an average of 10 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aynur Aytekin Özdemir, PhD, İstanbul medeniyet University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Yilmaz Kurt F, Aytekin Ozdemir A, Atay S. The Effects of Two Methods on Venipuncture Pain in Children: Procedural Restraint and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Package. Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Dec;21(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
- Uman LS, Birnie KA, Noel M, Parker JA, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Kisely SR. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 10;(10):CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub3.
- Hsieh YC, Cheng SF, Tsay PK, Su WJ, Cho YH, Chen CW. Effectiveness of Cognitive-behavioral Program on Pain and Fear in School-aged Children Undergoing Intravenous Placement. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2017 Dec;11(4):261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
- McCarthy AM, Cool VA, Hanrahan K. Cognitive behavioral interventions for children during painful procedures: research challenges and program development. J Pediatr Nurs. 1998 Feb;13(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(98)80069-9.
- Uman LS, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Kisely S. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents: an abbreviated cochrane review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Sep;33(8):842-54. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn031. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 29, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
June 28, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 30, 2023
First Posted (Estimated)
August 31, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
August 31, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 30, 2023
Last Verified
August 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-3/20
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
It will be shared after the article is published.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Procedural Pain
-
IRCCS Burlo GarofoloCompletedProcedural Pain ReliefItaly
-
Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain...DepomedCompletedMinor Procedural PainUnited States
-
IWK Health CentreCompletedNeonatal Procedural Pain ResponseCanada
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRecruitingProcedural Pain | Pain Catastrophizing | Procedural AnxietyUnited States
-
University of UtahCompleted
-
University Hospital, BrestCompletedPrevention of the Procedural Pain in the NewbornFrance
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruitingProcedural Pain | Procedural AnxietyQatar
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalEnrolling by invitationProcedural Pain | Procedural AnxietyUnited States
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUnknownVirtual Reality | Procedural Pain | Procedural AnxietyFrance
-
University of YalovaRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions Package
-
Hospital San Juan de Dios GuatemalaWorld Health OrganizationUnknown¨Maternal Morbidity¨ | ¨Perinatal Mortality¨Guatemala
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; National Institute on Aging (NIA); Hebrew...CompletedAortic Valve StenosisUnited States
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianCompletedPregnancy | Stillbirth | Decreased Fetal Movements Affecting Care of MotherUnited Kingdom, Ireland
-
University of South FloridaUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Temple UniversityCompletedGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Social Phobia | Separation Anxiety Disorder | Specific Phobia | Autism | Autism Spectrum Disorders | Obsessive-compulsive Disorder | Asperger's Syndrome | Pervasive Developmental Disability - Not Otherwise SpecifiedUnited States
-
SimpleC, LLCUniversity of Georgia; Advanced Medical ElectronicsCompletedQuality of Life | Cognitive Impairment | Dementia | Cognitive Change | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Engagement, Patient | Mood | Aging WellUnited States
-
Peking UniversityW.F. Maternal and Child Health HospitalNot yet recruitingOverweight and Obesity | Gestational Weight Gain
-
Florida International UniversityCompletedComorbidities and Coexisting Conditions | Tic Disorder, ChildhoodUnited States
-
University of PittsburghWithdrawn
-
Pitzer CollegeRecruitingOMI, OMI+, Control GroupUnited States
-
Merna IhabAlexandria UniversityRecruitingDental Caries in Children | Early Childhood CariesEgypt