Improving Patient Outcomes Through the Implementation of an IBD Biologic Care Pathway

March 27, 2024 updated by: Jennifer Jones

Improving Patient Outcomes Through the Implementation of a Standardized Biologic Care Pathway in the Treatment and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathway in the Treatment and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) includes a group of chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal system and is composed of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. As an immune-mediated disease, IBD treatment options include the use of biologic medicines including anti-tumor necrosis alpha factor (also called anti-TNFs) medication. Despite biologic medicines being an important part of IBD management, there is inconsistency in the way these medications are used. Implementation of evidence-based, standardized biologic care pathways (BCP) can improve treatment related outcomes. Previous research has shown that using a clinical care pathway, such as a BCP, is a feasible method to support clinical decision making and may improve disease-related outcomes for patients. The researchers propose a prospective study to determine how well a BCP can be incorporated into clinical practice, improve patient health outcomes, and reduce healthcare system redundancies. Also, the impact of a BCP on outcomes for patients treated with the help of a standardized BCP compared to those in patients treated without the use of a BCP will be studied. The results of this study will inform how best to incorporate evidence-based BCPs into real-world practice and support the wide-spread adoption of BCPs in clinical practice.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

182

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jennifer Jones, MD
  • Phone Number: 902-473-1499
  • Email: jljones@dal.ca

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
        • Recruiting
        • QEII Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than or equal to age 18
  • Starting an Anti TNF biologic therapy or Biosimilar

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-grade, symptomatic fibrostenotic strictures
  • Perforating complications
  • Intraabdominal or perianal abscesses
  • Active infection,
  • Known malignancy
  • Any contraindication to biologic therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Care as usual
Experimental: Biologic Care Pathway
Care through a biologic care pathway
Receiving care administered through a biologic care pathway.The central biologic intake nurse will touch base with the IBD program nurse navigator at preselected time points as per the pathway in order to coordinate the baseline pre- biologic work-up, clinical and biomarker assessments, and clinical assessments. Clinical management decisions will be informed by a combination of data points including clinical risk factors, TDM, fecal calprotectin concentrations, endoscopic and clinical disease activity indices as well as drug tolerance and adverse events. Within the care pathway, time- bound clinical and biomarker data will be provided to the treating clinician to help inform their clinical decisions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EQ5D Score
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline)
General Quality of life data measured using the Euroqol five dimension (EQ5D) Questionnaire. The EQ5D is a brief self-reported generic measure of current health. It is a 2 page questionnaire which has 5 descriptive questions. Each question may have 1 of 3-level answers, and a visual analog scale (VAS) on which patients can mark their current health state. The EQ-5D-3L index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value 1. This corresponds to the best possible health status, while an index value of <0 represents the worst possible health status.
week 0 (baseline)
EQ5D Score
Time Frame: week 50
General Quality of life data measured using the Euroqol five dimension (EQ5D) Questionnaire. The EQ5D is a brief self-reported generic measure of current health. It is a 2 page questionnaire which has 5 descriptive questions. Each question may have 1 of 3-level answers, and a visual analog scale (VAS) on which patients can mark their current health state. The EQ-5D-3L index is calculated by subtracting the values of the descriptive EQ-5D system from the numerical value 1. This corresponds to the best possible health status, while an index value of <0 represents the worst possible health status.
week 50

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline)
Number of emergency room visits
week 0 (baseline)
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: month 12
Number of emergency room visits
month 12
inpatient hospitalization,
Time Frame: week 0
Number of inpatient hospitalizations
week 0
inpatient hospitalization,
Time Frame: month 12
Number of inpatient hospitalizations
month 12
disease-related surgery
Time Frame: week 0
Number of disease related surgeries
week 0
disease-related surgery
Time Frame: month 12
Number of disease related surgeries
month 12
ambulatory care visits
Time Frame: week 0
number of ambulatory care visits
week 0
ambulatory care visits
Time Frame: month 12
number of ambulatory care visits
month 12
drug therapy
Time Frame: week 0
A list of current medications the patient is taking
week 0
drug therapy
Time Frame: month 12
A list of current medications the patient is taking
month 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBI Index Score
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline), week 12-14, week 30, week 50

IBD disease activity measured by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI index). The HBI involves patients answering five questions which are summed to produce a final score. The following are potential final score results:

Remission: <5 Mild Disease: 5-7 Moderate Disease: 8-16 Severe Disease: >16

week 0 (baseline), week 12-14, week 30, week 50
HBI Index Score
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline)

IBD disease activity measured by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI index). The HBI involves patients answering five questions which are summed to produce a final score. The following are potential final score results:

Remission: <5 Mild Disease: 5-7 Moderate Disease: 8-16 Severe Disease: >16

week 0 (baseline)
HBI Index Score
Time Frame: week 12

IBD disease activity measured by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI index). The HBI involves patients answering five questions which are summed to produce a final score. The following are potential final score results:

Remission: <5 Mild Disease: 5-7 Moderate Disease: 8-16 Severe Disease: >16

week 12
HBI Index Score
Time Frame: week 30

IBD disease activity measured by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI index). The HBI involves patients answering five questions which are summed to produce a final score. The following are potential final score results:

Remission: <5 Mild Disease: 5-7 Moderate Disease: 8-16 Severe Disease: >16

week 30
HBI Index Score
Time Frame: week 50

IBD disease activity measured by the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI index). The HBI involves patients answering five questions which are summed to produce a final score. The following are strata for final score results:

Remission: <5 Mild Disease: 5-7 Moderate Disease: 8-16 Severe Disease: >16

week 50
Partial Mayo Score
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline)

IBD disease activity (as measured by the Partial Mayo Score). Partial Mayo Score measures disease activity of Ulcerative colitis. The following are strata for final score results:

Total Partial Mayo Index Score Remission: 0-1 Mild Disease: 2-4 Moderate Disease: 5-6 Severe Disease: 7-9

week 0 (baseline)
Partial Mayo Score
Time Frame: week 12

IBD disease activity (as measured by the Partial Mayo Score). Partial Mayo Score measures disease activity of Ulcerative colitis. The following are strata for final score results:

Total Partial Mayo Index Score Remission: 0-1 Mild Disease: 2-4 Moderate Disease: 5-6 Severe Disease: 7-9

week 12
Partial Mayo Score
Time Frame: week 30

IBD disease activity (as measured by the Partial Mayo Score). Partial Mayo Score measures disease activity of Ulcerative colitis. The following are strata for final score results:

Total Partial Mayo Index Score Remission: 0-1 Mild Disease: 2-4 Moderate Disease: 5-6 Severe Disease: 7-9

week 30
Partial Mayo Score
Time Frame: week 50

IBD disease activity (as measured by the Partial Mayo Score). Partial Mayo Score measures disease activity of Ulcerative colitis. The following are strata for final score results:

Total Partial Mayo Index Score Remission: 0-1 Mild Disease: 2-4 Moderate Disease: 5-6 Severe Disease: 7-9

week 50
Fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline)
Fecal calprotectin concentration, assayed by stool sample
week 0 (baseline)
Fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: week 12
Fecal calprotectin concentration, assayed by stool sample
week 12
Fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: week 30
Fecal calprotectin concentration, assayed by stool sample
week 30
Fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: week 50
Fecal calprotectin concentration, assayed by stool sample
week 50
CRP concentration
Time Frame: week 0 (baseline)
serum CRP concentration
week 0 (baseline)
CRP concentration
Time Frame: week 12
serum CRP concentration
week 12
CRP concentration
Time Frame: week 30
serum CRP concentration
week 30
CRP concentration
Time Frame: week 50
serum CRP concentration
week 50

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Biologic Care Pathway

3
Subscribe