Continence, Sexual Function, Fitness and the Health of Men After Surgery for Prostate Cancer (CONTROL4LIFE)

February 27, 2024 updated by: University of Alberta

Continence, Sexual and Metabolic Health Programming to Promote Prostate Cancer Wellness for Life (CONTROL4LIFE)

The Continence, Sexual and Metabolic Health (CONTROL 4 LIFE) study will evaluate the recovery of continence, sexual function, and health outcomes in individuals who have undergone surgery for prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to better understand the timelines of recovery for these outcomes after surgery for prostate cancer. As part of this study, all participants will receive resources offered by Alberta Health Services regarding pre- and post-prostatectomy care, including information on pelvic floor exercises. Through the CONTROL 4 LIFE study, the investigators will also be evaluating outcomes related to physical activity, fitness and quality of life. These assessments will enable the investigators to better understand how well and how long it takes for individuals to recover after surgery for prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to conduct a trial examining the feasibility and the effects of a combined pelvic health rehabilitation and exercise program that can be delivered both in-person and virtually in individuals who have been treated with prostatectomy for prostate cancer. This hybrid format will support equitable program delivery regardless of location of residence. To address issues faced by men with prostate cancer, the investigators propose an intervention (offered virtually and in-person) that includes: 1) online education to support continence, sexual and overall health; 2) a group exercise fitness program that considers the needs and restrictions specific to the early post-prostatectomy surgical period, and 3) functional and intensive pelvic floor muscle exercise retraining to promote continence and sexual recovery.

Main objectives of this study

  1. Determine the feasibility, defined as the acceptability and appropriateness, of a combined pelvic health rehabilitation and exercise fitness program that can be delivered both in-person and virtually.
  2. Determine the effects of the program on the primary outcome measure of urinary continence in comparison with usual care.

Secondary objectives of this study

  1. To determine the effects of the program on cardiometabolic indicators in comparison with usual care.
  2. To determine the effects of the program on general fitness, secondary outcomes of urinary continence, sexual function, self-efficacy, and cancer symptom burden, in comparison with usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G4
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alberta
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have a diagnosis of prostate cancer (stage I to IV);
  • be scheduled for a prostatectomy surgery (any surgical approach);
  • have no restriction to participate in at least mild levels of physical activity, as confirmed by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q+);
  • speak and understand English.
  • adult: 18 years of age or older
  • optional exercise component: willing and able to commit to the 12-week intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have any medical conditions that may interfere with continence (i.e. neurological diseases);
  • have any contraindications to exercise testing or training;
  • have recent (>6 months) modifications to any medication aiming to reduce urinary incontinence (i.e. Myrbetric);
  • do not have regular access to the internet and a smart device or a computer at home/ at their community center;
  • are already receiving a pelvic floor exercise program through a pelvic floor physical therapist from their community.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Pelvic floor exercise program and general exercise programming
General exercises will be prescribed along with a specialized pelvic floor program
A general progressive resistance exercise program
Active Comparator: Control
Pelvic floor exercises and standard care (physical activity counseling)
General exercises will be prescribed along with a specialized pelvic floor program
Advice on increasing physical activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion Rate
Time Frame: Final assessment at one year
The number of participants completing the study including all planned outcomes
Final assessment at one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: One year
Percentage of participants who are eligible and agree to participate
One year
Adherence rate
Time Frame: Post-intervention: 12 weeks
Adherence to the intervention components
Post-intervention: 12 weeks
24-hour pad test
Time Frame: 24 hours at two time points: immediate post surgery and 12 weeks
Mean: Individual's urine loss by measuring weight (grams) of an absorbent pad
24 hours at two time points: immediate post surgery and 12 weeks
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice
Time Frame: One-year
16-questions: urinary function, sexual and erectile function, bowel and hormonal function; Scores: 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (most severe symptoms); Higher scores indicate worse functioning
One-year
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire
Time Frame: One-year
13 questions: occurrence and bother of lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life; Range of scores: 0-20 voiding subscale; 0-20 incontinence symptoms; Higher scores indicate worse functioning
One-year
36-Item Short Form Survey
Time Frame: One-year
Quality of life measure: Items are scored 0-100 (percentage of total possible score): Higher scores equal better quality of life
One-year
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
Time Frame: One year
11-item ordinal scale; Range 0-60; with higher scores indicating higher symptom burden
One year
Self-efficacy Questionnaire: Incontinence
Time Frame: One year
6 item ordinal scale: Range 0-60; Higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy
One year
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Dyanometer: mean in kgs
12 weeks
Lower body strength
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Sit-to-stand: mean number completed in 30 seconds
12-weeks
Upper limb mobility
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Shoulder Range of Motion: mean value in degrees
12 weeks
Flexibility
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Sit and reach: mean value in cm
12-weeks
Balance
Time Frame: 12-weeks
One-leg stance test: mean time in seconds
12-weeks
Walking endurance
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Six-minute walk test: mean distance in metres
12-weeks
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Height and weight will be combined to calculate BMI: mean: weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared
12-weeks
Glucose
Time Frame: 12-weeks
mmol/L (mean value)
12-weeks
Insulin level
Time Frame: 12-weeks
mmol/L (mean value)
12-weeks
Lipid profile
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Cholesterol level: mg/dL (mean value)
12-weeks
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Value in percentage (mean value)
12-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathan Hoy, MD, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Howard Evans, MD, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Margaret McNeely, University of Alberta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be housed on the University of Alberta's Dataverse

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following completion of the study and primary publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Pelvic floor exercise program

3
Subscribe