Evaluating RISQ System Implementation in Acutely Malnourished Children in Chad (CRIMSON) (CRIMSON)

November 28, 2023 updated by: Christopher Parshuram, The Hospital for Sick Children

Cluster-Randomized Trial of the Implementation of the Responses to Illness Severity Quantification System (RISQ) in Children With Acute Malnutrition Six to Fifty-nine Months of Age in Ngouri, Chad

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the Responses to Illness Severity Quantification (RISQ) system implementation on mortality and processes of care in a nutritional program treating children 6 to 59 months of age with acute malnutrition in Ngouri, Chad.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The CRIMSON Study is a 12-month cluster randomized trial that will evaluate the effect of implementing the RISQ system compared with usual care on all-cause mortality, in children with acute malnutrition aged 6 to 59 months enrolled in the OptiMA nutrition program in Chad.

The intervention is the RISQ System and the clusters are the individual health centres that are randomized with a ratio of 1:1, RISQ System: Usual care. The 12 month intervention period will begin following a run in phase in which sites randomized to intervention will introduce and establish the new practices and in which sites randomized to usual care will continue to provide usual care.

The RISQ system is a scientifically developed clinical decision support tool that consists of: [1] the RISQ score; [2] documentation form; [3] score-matched recommendations and [4] an implementation package. The RISQ score, developed through our prospective observational study in Maiduguri Nigeria ((NCT04582773) ranges from 0 to 26 (high scores indicating greatest severity of illness). In the development dataset, the mean RISQ score on admission was 3.6 in hospital survivors and 7.3 for children dying <48hr of admission. RISQ scores <24hr before death had Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC) of 0.93. The RISQ score performed similarly well in children independent of their clinical conditions as a diagnosis-independent measure of severity of illness. Additionally, through a study of 903 hospitalized children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM), the RISQ score could discriminate between points of escalation or de-escalation of care and can reflect illness severity in children throughout hospitalization. The documentation form provides visual representation of the sub-scores of each RISQ score items and guidance for score calculation. The score-matched recommendations of the RISQ system that are linked to the RISQ scores are derived from an expert panel of clinicians, with over 100 years of collective experience caring for acutely malnourished children, and provide guidance about intensity of care. This includes the frequency of observation, consideration of secondary review, inpatient admission, and transfer into / out of inpatient care areas where more intensive treatments are provided.The implementation package consists of theoretical and practical training modules including specific 'train the trainers' sessions for key personal involved in the implementing programs.

The CRIMSON study is nested within the existing framework of the OptiMA nutritional program and observational study conducted by the Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA). The program involves health centres within Ngouri, a sub-prefecture of the Lake Region in Chad (and surrounding area) plus an inpatient unit at the Ngouri District Hospital providing care for children with acute malnutrition. Inclusion criteria for the OptiMA program are based on mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) of <125mm and/or bilateral pitting oedema. Usual care in the OptiMA program is as follows: nutritional treatment to participants consists of Ready-to-use-Therapeutic Food (RUTF) adjusted based on their MUAC value throughout the duration of their care. Management of the children with acute illnesses follows the established approach for management of children with severe acute malnutrition using the World Health Organization (WHO) "danger signs" and Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) algorithms to guide admission to hospital. Additionally, as part of the OptiMA program in Ngouri, pulse oximeters have been introduced in all health centres and inpatient care unit, following training by ALIMA. Included in the routine visits of the program is the measurement and documentation of each of the 7 RISQ score items [heart rate, respiratory rate, respiratory effort, oxygen saturation, temperature, level of consciousness and oxygen use (oxygen is currently only available in the inpatient care)] by nurses.

The investigators anticipate that implementation of the RISQ system in a nutrition treatment program will improve sensitivity and specificity of clinical evaluation in determining which children require hospitalization, and what level of medical care within the in-patient unit is appropriate and in turn potentially reduce mortality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Children:

  1. age: 6 to 59 months at enrolment on the day of their admission/re-admission to the OptiMA program
  2. written consent to participate

Front line staff providing care to patients enrolled in the Optima program:

[1] Registered Nurses [2] Medical Doctors

Exclusion Criteria:

Children:

  1. Children allergic to milk, peanuts and/or ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)
  2. Children not residing in one of the study areas.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
The 17 health centres randomized to "Usual Care" will provide care as per OptiMA program.
Experimental: Intervention Arm
The 17 health centres randomized to the intervention arm will provide care as per OptiMA program with the addition of the RISQ System decision support.
The RISQ System involves: [1] the RISQ score: calculated routinely using the [2] documentation record and linked to [3] score-matched recommendations. Introduction into clinical care is supported by [4] the RISQ System implementation package. During the 2 month prior to implementation, front-line staff in the intervention arm will be trained on and will practice the use of the RISQ System .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality.
Time Frame: 12 months

Mortality over the period beginning at admission to the program and ending at either program discharge or to a maximum of 60 days after study enrolment. Program discharge will be one of: [1] medical/anthropometric criteria or [2] defaulting from the program.

Defaulting from the program is defined as children who do not attend the weekly clinic visits for 3 consecutive weeks.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timing of inpatient mortality
Time Frame: Duration of hospitalization in days up to 60 days
Timing will be defined as [a] within 48 hours of hospital admission and [b] timing of death after admission to hospital
Duration of hospitalization in days up to 60 days
Timing of outpatient mortality
Time Frame: Duration of program inclusion in days up to 60 days
Timing will be defined as [a] within 48 hours of being seen by health-care team [b] timing of death after being seen by outpatient health-care team
Duration of program inclusion in days up to 60 days
Therapeutic intensity
Time Frame: First 24 hours from admission to hospital
To be measured by location on admission to inpatient care (Intensive Care Unit/Phase1/Phase2)
First 24 hours from admission to hospital
Efficiency of inpatient care
Time Frame: Duration of hospitalization in days up to 60 days
Efficiency measured by length of inpatient stay (whole or part days)
Duration of hospitalization in days up to 60 days
Workload
Time Frame: Month 1 and month 12
Frontline staff perception of workload measured through questionnaires using a 5 point scale
Month 1 and month 12
Knowledge
Time Frame: Month 1 and month 12
Frontline staff knowledge of assessment skills measured through questionnaire using a 5 point scale
Month 1 and month 12
Fidelity of RISQ Implementation
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of measured vital signs performed on individual patient at health centre visit with corresponding disposition in program, recorded in 10 randomly selected patients/week/health centre
12 months
Acceptability
Time Frame: Month 1 and month 12
Acceptability of the RISQ System by front-line staff evaluated through a questionnaire using a 5 point scale
Month 1 and month 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lived experience of RISQ System implementation
Time Frame: one time at end of 12 month implementation period
Lived experiences measured by open ended questions about strengths/weaknesses of RISQ System implementation added to frontline staff perception questionnaire at end of intervention period
one time at end of 12 month implementation period
comparison of automated versus manual measurements of vital signs (Respiratory rate in breaths/min)
Time Frame: During run-in phase prior to implementation of intervention, on average 2 months
Comparison determined by agreement between the two different methods for respiratory rate measurement
During run-in phase prior to implementation of intervention, on average 2 months
comparison of automated versus manual measurements of vital signs (Temperature in degrees Celsius)
Time Frame: During run-in phase prior to implementation of intervention, on average 2 months
Comparison determined by agreement between the two different methods for temperature measurement
During run-in phase prior to implementation of intervention, on average 2 months
Comparison of RISQ scores among children with different clinical conditions in inpatient care
Time Frame: Duration of hospitalization in days up to 60 days
Differences in RISQ scores among children with different clinical diagnoses a) on admission to inpatient care; b) throughout inpatient care; and c) at exit from inpatient care
Duration of hospitalization in days up to 60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Parshuram, MD, PhD, The Hospital for Sick Children

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1000080735

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

On reasonable request - after publication of the study and with permission of parties attached to the study, and after Research Ethics Board review and approval.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Acute Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on The Responses to Illness Severity Quantification (RISQ) System

3
Subscribe