Aortic Stenosis and Cardiac Amyloidosis

November 8, 2023 updated by: Christian Nitsche, Medical University of Vienna

Aortic Stenosis and Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Pragmatic, Streamlined International

The dual pathology of aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is increasingly recognized. Even tough efforts have been undertaken to bring cohorts together, the largest cohort of AS-ATTR to date is <50 patients. It is the aim of the present international, multi-center registry to collect ~300 patients with AS-CA creating a big enough cohort to allow

  1. thorough characterization of this condition
  2. assessment of log-term clinical outcomes of AS-CA
  3. assessment of effectiveness of amyloid-specific treatment on top of valve replacement

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) and transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis are both conditions commonly affecting the elderly. Bone scintigraphy using amyloid-avid tracers (99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid, DPD; 99mTc-pyrophosphate; or 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate) represents the key imaging modality for non-invasive ATTR diagnosis. Recent studies have used this technology to screen AS patients and demonstrated that AS and ATTR may coexist in 8 to 16%. This is substantially higher than in non-cardiac referrals for bone scintigraphy (range 1-3% in individuals >80 years), which is considered the most accurate approach to estimate the ATTR prevalence in the general population. While the dual burden of AS and ATTR might suggest adverse prognostic implications, it has been shown that AS-ATTR and lone AS patients benefit equally from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with comparable 1- and 2-year survival rates. Yet, data on long-term outcomes are still missing.

With increased recognition and valvular treatment of AS-ATTR, the disease course after TAVR becomes a key issue. Our data suggest significantly different remodeling between lone AS and AS-ATTR, with the latter being transformed into a "lone-ATTR" cardiomyopathy phenotype at one-year post-TAVR. Novel ATTR-specific treatments are now available, with the potential to further improve prognosis in AS-ATTR on top of valvular replacement. However, patients with significant AS were not included in the ATTR-ACT trial, and treatment effectiveness in this patient population therefore remains unclear. Also, despite increased ATTR screening globally, the case numbers for dual AS-ATTR of individual centers are still low.

The present international multi-center study is therefore designed to provide detailed characterization of dual AS-ATTR, inform about long-term clinical outcomes and assess the effect of ATTR specific treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a dual pathology of significant aortic stenosis and concomitant cardiac amyloidosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with significant AS and a concomitant diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis who are eligible for inclusion as per local permissions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without significant AS (less than moderate AS)
  • Patients with other subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis (e.g., light chain)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
AS-CA without amyloid-specific treatment
Patients with no amyloid-specific treatment
No amyloid-specific treatment
AS-CA with amyloid-specific treatment
Patients receiving newly available amyloid-specific drugs
Amyloid-specific treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phenotyping of AS with "early" ATTR infiltration (DPD grade 1) versus "advanced" ATTR cardiomyopathy (DPD grade 2/3)
Time Frame: 0 months
Dual pathology patients with DPD grade 1 will be compared to those with DPD grade 2/3 with regards to symptoms (New York Heart Association functional class), functional capacity (6-Minute walk distance), biomarkers (NT-proBNP and high-sensitive Troponin), and imaging markers on transthoracic echocardiography (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, stroke volume index, left ventricular mass). Differences between groups for all of these variables will be analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
0 months
All cause mortality in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
Time Frame: 60 months
All-cause mortality analyzed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier estimates in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
60 months
Hospitalization for heart failure in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
Time Frame: 60 months
Hospitalization for heart failure analyzed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier estimates in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
60 months
Cardiovascular mortality in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
Time Frame: 60 months
Cardiovascular mortality analyzed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier estimates in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
60 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Natural history of AS-ATTR after valve replacement
Time Frame: 60 months
Trajectory of morphological (left ventricular mass), functional (ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, New York Heart Association class) and biomarker (NT-proBNP, high-sensitive Troponin) profiles. Longitudinal changes between visits will be compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, McNemar's test, and the Stuart Maxwell test where appropriate.
60 months
Composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or death in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
Time Frame: 60 months
Composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or death analyzed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan Meier estimates in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
60 months
Heart failure hospitalzation rate in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment
Time Frame: 36 months
Differences in heart failure hospitalization rate, calculated as the number of heart failure hospitalizations per total person-years in AS-CA with versus without CA-specific treatment at 1 and 3 years, analyzed by the poisson model.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on No amyloid-specific treatment

3
Subscribe