- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06167330
TITAN Trial: Reducing Phantom Limb Pain in People With Amputations (TITAN)
TITAN: a Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of Two Treatment Programs for Reducing Phantom Limb Pain Intensity and Its Interference With Function
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of two rehabilitation programs for individuals who have undergone amputations and are experiencing phantom limb pain. The main question it aims to answer is:
- In individuals who have undergone amputations and are experiencing phantom limb pain, what is the effectiveness of a progressive rehabilitation program compared to a treatment program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and cranial electrical stimulation on reducing pain intensity and pain interference?
A total of 208 participants will be randomized into two groups: progressive rehabilitation program and stimulation devices. The progressive rehabilitation program includes pain science education, sensory training, and left/right judgements, imagined movements and mirror therapy. The treatment program for the group receiving the stimulation devices includes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and cranial electrical stimulation. Both interventions will be delivered via eight, up to 1-hour telehealth sessions. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 52.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: James H McAuley, PhD
- Phone Number: +61293991266
- Email: j.mcauley@neura.edu.au
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Rafael Z Pinto, PhD
- Email: r.zambelli@neura.edu.au
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
- Recruiting
- Neuroscience Research Australia
-
Contact:
- James H McAuley, PhD
- Phone Number: +61293991266
- Email: j.mcauley@neura.edu.au
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Experiencing phantom limb pain for at least three months.
- Report at least one episode of phantom limb pain in the previous week.
- Report at least 4 points in pain intensity over the previous 7 days, assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale.
- Be a resident in Australia for the intervention and follow-up period.
- Have access to the internet and smart device (e.g., mobile phone).
- Be proficient in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral amputation.
- Scheduled for major surgery during the study period.
- Pain in the intact limb.
- Vision impairment that would preclude successful participation.
- Auditory impairment that would preclude successful participation.
- Cognitive problems that would preclude effective participation in trial procedures (e.g., Alzheimer's, dementia).
- Previously diagnosed neurological disorders that affect the movement of the intact limb (e.g., stroke, Parkinson, Multiple Sclerosis).
- Completed Graded Motor Imagery in the order of left/right judgements, imagined movements, and mirror therapy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Progressive rehabilitation program
The progressive rehabilitation program is a multicomponent intervention, including pain science education, sensory training, implicit and explicit motor imagery, and mirror therapy.
|
Twelve-week treatment program delivered via eight, up to 1-hour telehealth sessions.
The first five sessions will be scheduled every week, and the final three sessions will be scheduled fortnightly.
Participants will also be prescribed approximately 15-30 minutes of home activities daily.
The treatment program includes pain science education, sensory training, implicit and explicit motor imagery, and mirror therapy.
Participants will complete activities at a self-directed pace following a standard progression protocol.
Participant adherence will be measured via session attendance and self-report therapy diaries.
|
Experimental: Stimulation devices
The treatment program includes Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Cranial Electrical Stimulation.
Participants will complete activities at a self-directed pace following a standard progression protocol.
|
Twelve-week treatment program delivered via eight, up to 1-hour telehealth sessions.
The first five sessions will be scheduled every week, and the final three sessions will be scheduled fortnightly.
Participants will also be prescribed approximately 15-30 minutes of home activities daily.
The treatment program includes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and cranial electrical stimulation.
Participants will complete activities at a self-directed pace following a standard progression protocol.
Participant adherence will be measured via session attendance and self-report therapy diaries.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Week 12 post-randomisation
|
Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale.
|
Week 12 post-randomisation
|
Pain interference
Time Frame: Week 12 post-randomisation
|
Average pain interference with function over the previous 7 days assessed using the 0-10 Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.
|
Week 12 post-randomisation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Weeks 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale.
|
Weeks 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Pain interference
Time Frame: Weeks 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Average pain interference with function over the previous 7 days assessed using the 0-10 Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.
|
Weeks 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Pain severity
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 0-10 Pain Severity Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Sleep subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory's Pain Interference Scale
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Sleep Quality assessed using the Sleep subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory's Pain Interference Scale.
The participants will rate the interference of pain with sleep on a 0-10 scale where "0" represents "does not interfere" and "10" represents "completely interferes".
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
PROMIS Self-Efficacy Manage Symptoms
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Pain Self-efficacy assessed using PROMIS Self-Efficacy Manage Symptoms (Computer Adaptive Test) (28-item version; higher scores mean more self-efficacy).
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
PROMIS Depression
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Emotional distress and depression assessed using PROMIS Depression (Computer Adaptive Test) (28-item version; higher scores mean more depression).
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Health-Related Quality of Life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L dimensions scale range, 1-5; higher scores indicate better quality of life) and health thermometer (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life).
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Global Perceived Effect Scale
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Perception of recovery assessed using the Global Perceived Effect scale (range from -5 to +5; higher scores mean greater improvement).
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: From randomisation to week 12 post-randomisation
|
Adverse events assessed via self-report.
|
From randomisation to week 12 post-randomisation
|
Adherence to treatment
Time Frame: From randomisation to week 12 post-randomisation
|
Adherence to treatment assessed via session attendance and self-report (diary), including frequency per week and duration per day.
|
From randomisation to week 12 post-randomisation
|
Total health-care costs
Time Frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Total health-care costs will be estimated as the trial intervention costs and outside trial health-care resource use attributable to phantom limb pain from the Medicare Benefits Scheme and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the EQ-5D-5L using the Australian utility weights will also be used in the trial-based cost-utility analysis.
|
Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
|
Treatment rationale credibility
Time Frame: Week 1 post-randomisation
|
Treatment rationale credibility assessed using the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire.
The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with lower scores indicating lower credibility.
|
Week 1 post-randomisation
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (mediator)
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Pain self efficacy measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.
The total score of this questionnaire ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy and functioning despite ongoing pain.
|
Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Concept of Pain Inventory (mediator)
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Beliefs and knowledge of pain science assessed using the Concept of Pain Inventory.
This is a 13-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 52 points, with higher scores reflecting greater alignment with contemporary pain science.
|
Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Pain Catastrophising Scale (mediator)
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Pain catastrophising assessed using the Pain Catastrophising Scale.
The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating a higher level of catastrophising.
|
Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Phantom limb movement scale (mediator)
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
The ability to move the phantom limb assessed on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (0: No movement at all, 10: Complete range of movement as if the limb were still present).
|
Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Phantom limb body perception disturbance scale (mediator)
Time Frame: Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
The phantom limb body perception disturbances assessed using 4 questions measuring ownership, awareness, attention and emotional feelings on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (range, 0-40; lower scores indicate more severe body perception disturbances).
Adapted from the Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome body perception disturbance scale.
|
Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: James H McAuley, PhD, Neuroscience Research Australia
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- U1111-1296-2782
- X23-0202 & 2023/ETH00540 (Other Identifier: RPAH Ethics and Governance Office)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data will be made to interested researchers only upon reasonable request and once the proposed research project has received separate ethics approval from a Human Research Ethics Committee.
Request to the data custodian, the Principal Investigator (j.mcauley@neura.edu.au).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Amputation
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Boninger, Michael, MDNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Ripple Therapeutics...RecruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Active, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the WristUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Medipol UniversityRecruitingEvaluation of Functionality of Amputees According to the Medicare Functional K Classification SystemAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerTurkey
-
University of MichiganActive, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Arm, UpperUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Vivonics, Inc.CompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower | Limb; Absence, Congenital, Lower | Amputation StumpUnited States
Clinical Trials on Progressive rehabilitation program
-
University of Colorado, DenverTerminatedPhysical DeconditioningUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaUniversity of Melbourne; Arthritis Research Centre of CanadaCompleted
-
Creighton UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute of General Medical... and other collaboratorsCompletedACL TearsUnited States
-
Northeastern UniversityRecruitingOsteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain ChronicUnited States
-
Federal University of São PauloCompletedFibromyalgia
-
University of ZurichNational Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine named after academician...Completed
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Sleep DisturbanceTurkey
-
University Hospital, LimogesRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingQuality of Life | Facial Palsy | Motor Recovery | Self-rehabilitationFrance
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompletedPeripheral Arterial Disease | ClaudicationFrance