An Exploratory Study of Visual Function Rehabilitation in Patients With Ocular Trauma

Ocular trauma is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, often resulting in severe visual impairment or even loss of vision after injury.

Although after powerful surgical treatment, there are still some patients whose visual function is difficult to improve, and the patients with eye trauma lack effective vision rehabilitation therapy.Therefore, the research on visual function rehabilitation of patients with ocular trauma needs to be further carried out . Perceptual learning is based on cortical remodeling, repetitive visual task training. This training is to perform a series of repetitive visual tasks through the Gabor patch, simulating the receptive field structure of simple cells in the primary visual cortex (V1 area), "awakening visual cells", and improving the visual processing ability of the cerebral cortex. Compared with the traditional vision rehabilitation therapy, perceptual learning optimizes the visual quality at the visual center level. It is an innovative therapy, having the potential to solve the visual function of patients with eye trauma. This study intends to explore new visual rehabilitation methods for patients with ocular trauma, and explore the changes in visual cortical function and area of patients after perceptual training.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Perceptual training is a type of perceptual learning that initiates neural modifications during continuous repetitive task training, thereby increasing neural efficiency and improving the visual processing capabilities of the cerebral cortex. The perceptual training program simulates the receptive field structure of simple cells in the primary visual cortex (area V1) through Gabor cursors and lateral occlusion techniques to awaken visual cells during repetitive visual tasks. Gabor Patches are targeted stimuli that are widely used in the field of optic neurology to produce highly effective stimulation of the primary visual cortex. Lateral shading technology can effectively stimulate specific neurons. It can not only improve the interaction of neurons in the cerebral cortex in patients with amblyopia, but also stimulate the cooperation of neurons. This technology has also been proved to be effective in normal people. Therefore, on the basis of this theory, we plan to use perceptual learning to conduct repetitive visual stimulation for three months, and return to visit three times within three months. The main indicator is contrast sensitivity, and the efficacy of perceptual learning is evaluated by evaluating the improvement of contrast sensitivity. The study was designed as a self-controlled before-and-after trial. Volunteers were recruited from the outpatients of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center's ophthalmic trauma clinic to participate in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Zhonshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Retinopathy, optic neuropathy, endophthalmitis and other injuries caused by ocular trauma, with varying degrees of central vision reduction and visual field impairment
  2. Age 3~60 years old
  3. Best corrected visual acuity of the affected eye: 20/200≤BCVA≤20/25
  4. Intraocular pressure is normal, non-hypotonal/atrophic: 7--21mmHg
  5. After the traumatic injury, the condition is stable ≥for 3 months after treatment, and the visual axis has a complete and transparent optical pathway
  6. If the patient is injured in one eye, There were no abnormal lesions in the contralateral eye, no abnormalities in slit lamp and indirect ophthalmoscopy, and no peripheral retinopathy in both eyes was found on triprimmoscopy. Carefully ask for a history of no other eye disease in both eyes and a systemic history that has caused an associated eye disease or has affected visual formation.
  7. The cranial structure is intact, the function is good, and there is no primary or secondary injury
  8. Able to cooperate with the questionnaire and treatment, good compliance
  9. Those who are willing to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have active inflammation of the eye
  2. Previous abnormal intraocular blood supply such as occlusion of the central intraocular artery due to trauma or non-traumatic factors
  3. History of other non-traumatic intraocular surgery
  4. Ocular related lesions caused by other non-traumatic factors that can interfere with this study, such as age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, amblyopia, etc.
  5. Use of other rehabilitation training methods or visual aids 3 months before enrollment
  6. Lesions with systemic diseases whose degree of lesions have affected visual function, such as diabetic retinopathy, Hypertension and arteriosclerotic fundus changes, rubella-related ocular changes, etc.
  7. Patients with severe systemic diseases such as renal failure and malignant hypertension or may affect visual function (such as retinal structure and function, choroidal structure and function, etc.)
  8. Patients with congenital ocular lesions
  9. Patients with optic nerve and retinopathy caused by non-traumatic factors
  10. Patients with cranial brain disease or craniocere-related lesions with poor cortical function
  11. Psychological related diseases
  12. MRI contraindications, Such as claustrophobia and non-MRI compatible metal implants
  13. people with speech impairment and intellectual disability
  14. those who are considered inappropriate by the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group consisted of the patients themselves. Compare data before and after treatment
Perceptual training is carried out at home once a day, and the viewing distance of the patients from the display screen is uniformly 1.5m, 30 minutes each time, for three months, and they return to the hospital for re-examination of ophthalmology at the 3rd months after the training. When using the perceptual training program for the first time, the training program will adjust the size of the Gabor spot according to the size of the user's computer, and prompt the patient to adjust the brightness of the computer screen to unify the Gabor spot parameters of each user and ensure the consistency of the spot stimulation information received by each user.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 3 months
Log MAR
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast Sensitivity Function
Time Frame: 3 months
Area Under the Log Contrast Sensitivity Function
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: XUEYING ZHONGLIU, Zhonshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun-Yat-sen University Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eye Injuries

Clinical Trials on Perceptual Learning

3
Subscribe