Confidential Care and Adolescent HIV Testing

February 19, 2024 updated by: Yale University

Implementation of Confidential Care to Increase Adolescent HIV Testing in Pediatric Primary Care Settings

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of structural intervention components to increase adolescent HIV testing uptake by improving the implementation of confidential care as standard practice in pediatric primary care.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This pilot study will evaluate a multicomponent structural intervention to increase adolescent HIV testing uptake by improving the implementation of confidential care as standard practice in pediatric primary care settings. The objectives of the study are to: (a) evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and other implementation outcomes (e.g., reach); (b) assess change in HIV testing uptake; and (c) determine the combination of structural intervention components to be further evaluated in a future full-scale optimization trial. These objectives will be achieved through a pilot optimization trial; the trial will follow a full factorial experimental design with data collection at three time points over a 12-month period.

During the 6-month pre-intervention period, baseline measures will be assessed extracting electronic health record (EHR) data on the number of adolescent patients who were screened for, accepted, and received results of HIV testing. During the 6-month intervention period, clinics will be randomized to one of four experimental conditions based on the following two factors: (1) provider training; (2) implementation of clinic protocols to support confidential care provision. Clinics randomized to a condition involving provider training will receive training on state-specific laws regulating minors' access to confidential HIV testing. Clinics randomized to a condition involving the implementation of clinic protocols will receive training on navigating the new protocols. Measurement of intervention and implementation processes and outcomes will be guided by the five dimensions of the RE-AIM Framework: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. During the 6-month post-intervention period, EHR data will be used to assess the change in HIV testing uptake over the study period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

The intervention occurs at the clinic-level and so the enrolled participant is a pediatric primary care clinic. The patient-level outcome (i.e., change in HIV testing uptake) will be collected based on the following eligibility criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

- 13-17 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <13 years old
  • >17 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No provider training or clinic protocols
This clinic will not receive training on state-specific laws regulating minors' access to confidential HIV testing or implementation of new protocols to support confidential care provision.
Active Comparator: Clinic protocols
This clinic will receive training on navigating new protocols to support confidential care provision.
Clinics randomized to a condition involving the implementation of new clinic protocols to support confidential care provision will receive training on navigating the new protocols.
Active Comparator: Provider training
This clinic will receive training on state-specific laws regulating minors' access to confidential HIV testing.
Clinics randomized to a condition involving provider training will receive training on state-specific laws regulating minors' access to confidential HIV testing.
Active Comparator: Provider training and clinic protocols
This clinic will receive training on state-specific laws regulating minors' access to confidential HIV testing and navigating new protocols to support confidential care provision.
Clinics randomized to a condition involving the implementation of new clinic protocols to support confidential care provision will receive training on navigating the new protocols.
Clinics randomized to a condition involving provider training will receive training on state-specific laws regulating minors' access to confidential HIV testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility, defined as the extent to which structural intervention components to improve confidential care implementation can be successfully carried out in pediatric primary care settings
Time Frame: 6 months
Feasibility will be measured with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure, a self-reported four-item measure with established reliability and validity. Item responses range from 1="completely disagree" to 5="completely agree." Scores are created by averaging responses. Score values range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.
6 months
Acceptability, defined as the perception among pediatric primary care clinic leadership and providers that structural intervention components to improve confidential care implementation are agreeable or satisfactory
Time Frame: 6 months
Acceptability will be measured with the Acceptability of Intervention Measure, a self-reported four-item measure with established reliability and validity. Item responses range from 1="completely disagree" to 5="completely agree." Scores are created by averaging responses. Score values range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
6 months
Change in HIV testing uptake
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Change in HIV testing uptake will be assessed as the difference in the number of adolescent patients who were screened for, accepted, and received results of HIV testing during the 6-month pre-intervention period compared to the 6-month post-intervention period.
Baseline, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach, defined as the number of adolescent patients who receive confidential care
Time Frame: 6 months
Reach will be assessed through a brief online survey to be self-administered by providers after each visit with an adolescent patient.
6 months
Adoption, defined as the proportion of pediatric primary care providers who have time alone with and/or provide confidentiality assurances to adolescent patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Adoption will be assessed through a brief online survey to be self-administered by providers after each visit with an adolescent patient.
6 months
Implementation, defined as pediatric primary care provider fidelity to confidential care provision
Time Frame: 6 months
Implementation will be assessed through a brief online survey to be self-administered by providers after each visit with an adolescent patient.
6 months
Maintenance, defined as the extent to which confidential care is provided and adolescent patients are screened for, accept, and receive results of HIV testing 6-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
Maintenance will be assessed through a brief online survey to be self-administered by providers after each visit with an adolescent patient and the number of adolescent patients who were screened for, accepted, and received results of HIV testing during the 6-month post-intervention period.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christina Aivadyan, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000036999
  • 1K01MH136929-01 (Other Identifier: NIMH *ID not yet added)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiv

Clinical Trials on Clinic protocols

3
Subscribe