Optimizing Suicide Prevention Strategies for Pediatric Primary Care

April 4, 2024 updated by: Stephanie Stepp, University of Pittsburgh
Increasing rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adolescents must be addressed. The study will adapt and collect preliminary effectiveness data on a digital suicide prevention intervention that can be delivered in pediatric primary care settings by front line pediatricians. The study has the potential to offer a low-cost and scalable primary care intervention that may decrease risk of suicide among at-risk youth.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study proposed is a treatment development study to enhance the capacity of pediatric primary care (PPC) to identify and manage suicidal youth by adapting iCHART for PPC settings that lack onsite behavioral health (BH) providers.

Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Pilot Trial: Conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized pilot trial of iCHART-cASAP vs. usual care across 4 PROS practices (across urban, suburban, and rural settings). Up to 20 providers (up to 5 providers per practice) will be enrolled. Following a 3-month baseline period when all practices provide usual care, practices will be randomized to onset to offering the intervention at one of the four, 3-month intervention onset intervals. Each practice will enroll a total of 15 youth across the 15-month pilot trial period for a total of 60 youth. 30 youth will receive usual care and 30 youth will receive iCHART-cASAP.

Delivery of Intervention Intervention will be delivered to adolescent patients and their caregivers receiving services at pediatric primary care practices within the PROS network.When PPC providers are assigned to the usual condition, patients will receive usual practices following identification of suicide risk on the PHQ-9-M. When PPC providers have crossed over to the iCHART- cASAP intervention condition, patients who are identified as suicidal will receive links from PPC providers/office staff to complete cASAP + onboard BRITE app to receive the safety planning and skills training intervention for adolescent and parent/caregiver. Once that is completed, PPC providers receive a summary report and review the safety plan with the patient and parent/caregiver, making revisions as needed. The provider then reviews treatment plan, including behavioral health referrals and schedules follow-up appointment. Next, the PPC provider/office staff enters referral recommendations and follow-up appointment reminders into iCHART's Text2Connect feature, which will increase engagement with the safety plan and facilitate adherence with treatment recommendations.

Providers will approach patients and parents/caregivers about the research study during their office visit, and interested families will complete a permission to contact form for research staff. Research staff will contact and describe the study, answer any questions, and obtain parental consent/youth assent.

Sample Size and Power Considerations Once usability testing is complete, 60 participants will be recruited from 4 practices randomized to begin utilizing iCHART during one of the 3-month intervention intervals. At the end of the trial, 30 participants will be enrolled when practices were delivering usual care and 30 participants will be enrolled when practices were delivering iCHART- cASAP.

Sample size and power considerations center on the precision of confidence interval (CI) width estimation for feasibility outcomes. Based on best practices for feasibility studies, and given the sample size of 60 and 5% type I error rate, there is ability to estimate 95% confidence interval with margin-of-errors ≤0.33 for the primary outcomes of depression and suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Youth Inclusion:

  • 12-17 years old
  • Parent/legal guardian consents for youth to be in study
  • English fluency and literacy-own a smart phone or device
  • PHQ-9M score indicating moderate or severe depression or suicidal ideation in past month, past 2 weeks, or an attempt in their lifetime

Caregiver/Parent inclusion:

-English fluency and literacy

Youth Exclusion:

  • evidence of intellectual delay
  • pervasive developmental disorder
  • other condition from medical history that would prohibit comprehension of questions or modules

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: iCHART/cASAP

An intervention previously studied in the ETUDES Center along with a computerized version of our As Safe As Possible intervention.

  1. Safety Planning App for suicidal youth which enables a primary care provider to streamline the gold standard of care for those with current suicidality symptoms through an app;
  2. Mental Health Screener questionnaire that gathers additional mental health symptoms, treatment preferences, and family's readiness for treatment engagement to help a primary care provider make a personalized, tailored treatment plan a suicidal youth is more likely to adhere to;
  3. Text Messages which aims to provide texts for 2-3 weeks to motivate you to engage with the safety plan and recommended treatment following the patient visit.
  4. cASAP is a computerized version of the As Safe As Possible intervention that offers self-led modules with psychoeducation about safety planning, cognitive-behavioral skills to cope with distress, and facilitate collaboration with parents.
When patients disclose suicidal ideation on the PHQ-9, the intervention of iCHART/cASAP will be implemented in the pediatrician's office, and in collaboration with parents, which includes safety planning, teaching skills to improve distress tolerance and emotion regulation all on the teen's smart device. iCHART/cASAP will include: Screening Wizard, a digital screening tool that will guide the provider to gauge patient satisfaction with current treatment and making further personalized treatment recommendations; cASAP, a computerized version of the As Safe As Possible intervention that focuses on psychoeducation in safety planning, distress tolerance, and emotion regulation skills; BRITE, a safety planning app with distress monitoring that a teen can be guided through with automated onboarding manuals; Text2Connect, an automated text messaging sent centrally to patients and parents to enhance treatment adherence.
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual
When patients disclose suicidal ideation on the PHQ-9, a treatment as usual approach will be given to the patient and their parent by the pediatrician which includes a paper safety plan will be completed and given to the patient and a referral placed for the patient to begin behavioral health services.
When patients disclose suicidal ideation on the PHQ-9, a treatment as usual approach will be given to the patient and their parent by the pediatrician which includes a paper safety plan will be completed and given to the patient and a referral placed for the patient to begin behavioral health services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidal ideation and behavior on PHQ-9M
Time Frame: Baseline
Suicidal ideation and attempt will be measured by 3 items on the PHQ-9-M (item #9 with scaled options of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day', past month ideation, prior suicide attempt) as a primary outcome.
Baseline
Suicidal ideation and behavior on PHQ-9M
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and attempt will be measured by 3 items on the PHQ-9-M (item #9 with scaled options of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day', past month ideation, prior suicide attempt) as a primary outcome.
1-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and behavior on PHQ-9M
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and attempt will be measured by 3 items on the PHQ-9-M (item #9 with scaled options of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day', past month ideation, prior suicide attempt) as a primary outcome.
3-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and behavior on PHQ-9M
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and attempt will be measured by 3 items on the PHQ-9-M (item #9 with scaled options of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day', past month ideation, prior suicide attempt) as a primary outcome.
6-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and behavior on CSSRS
Time Frame: Baseline
Suicidal attempt & ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.
Baseline
Suicidal ideation and behavior on CSSRS
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
Suicidal attempt & ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.
1-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and behavior on CSSRS
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
Suicidal attempt & ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.
3-month follow-up
Suicidal ideation and behavior on CSSRS
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Suicidal attempt & ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.
6-month follow-up
Depression Severity
Time Frame: Baseline
Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9-M) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9M uses scaled responses of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day'.
Baseline
Depression Severity
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9-M) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9M uses scaled responses of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day'.
1-month follow-up
Depression Severity
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9-M) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9M uses scaled responses of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day'.
3-month follow-up
Depression Severity
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9-M) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9M uses scaled responses of '0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day'.
6-month follow-up
Application utilization
Time Frame: Monitored over 6 months
Use of the iCHART-cASAP components and web portals will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number and proportion of adolescents, parents, and providers who have engaged with the application over time.
Monitored over 6 months
Service Utilization - SACA
Time Frame: Baseline
Frequency and type of behavioral/mental health and primary care services using the Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA).
Baseline
Service Utilization - SACA
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Frequency and type of behavioral/mental health and primary care services using the Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA).
6-month follow-up
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up

Satisfaction will be measured with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The scaled options for the CSQ vary as follows:

Question 1: "4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Fair, 1=Poor" Question 2: "1=No, Definitely Not, 2=No, Not Really, 3=Yes, Generally, 4=Yes, Definitely" Question 3: "4=Almost all of my needs have been met, 3=Most of my needs have been met, 2=Only a few of my needs have been met, 1=None of my needs have been met" Question 4: "1=No, definitely not, 2=No, I don't think so, 3=Yes, I think so, 4=Yes, Definitely" Question 5: "1=Quite Dissatisfied, 2=Indifferent or mildly dissatisfied, 3=Mostly satisfied, 4=Very satisfied" Question 6: "4=Yes, they helped a great deal, 3=Yes, they helped somewhat, 2=No, they really didn't help, 1=No, they seemed to make things worse" Question 7: "4=Very satisfied, 3=Mostly satisfied, 2=Indifferent or mildly dissatisfied, 1=Quite dissatisfied" Question 8: "1=No, Definitely not, 2=No, I don't think so, 3=Yes, I think so, 4=Yes, Definitely

6-month follow-up
Acceptability
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Acceptability of cASAP and the iCHART-cASAP intervention will be assessed through the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). The scaled options for the measure are: '1=Completely disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree, 5=Completely agree'
6-month follow-up
Patient Usability
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Patient usability will be measured by the Systems Usability Survey (SUS). The System Usability Scale uses scaled options of: '1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree'.
6-month follow-up
Provider Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Provider Feasibility will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The Feasibilty of Intervention Measure uses scaled options of: '1=Completely disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree, 5=Completely agree'.
6-month follow-up
Provider Usability
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
System Usability Scale (SUS) will assess usability. The System Usability Scale uses scaled options of: '1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree'.
6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stress
Time Frame: Baseline
Stress will be measured by the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychological Stress Experiences 4- item Short Form. The scaled options for this measure are: '1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always'.
Baseline
Stress
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
Stress will be measured by the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychological Stress Experiences 4- item Short Form. The scaled options for this measure are: '1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always'.
1-month follow-up
Stress
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
Stress will be measured by the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychological Stress Experiences 4- item Short Form. The scaled options for this measure are: '1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always'.
3-month follow-up
Stress
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Stress will be measured by the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychological Stress Experiences 4- item Short Form. The scaled options for this measure are: '1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always'.
6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie Stepp, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY23040042
  • 1R34MH132932-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Consistent with the NIMH's data sharing and data use policies this research study and clinical trial will be compliant with requirements for depositing data with the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) in the National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness (NDCT). Specific statements will be added to the consent forms to allow for data sharing. The final completely de-identified dataset(s) will include demographic and clinical data at baseline, and primary and secondary outcomes for all studies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Study staff will work to create unique identifiers for all participants, create a data dictionary for all variables, and submit raw data bi-annually. Data will be released to NDCT after manuscripts reporting primary findings are accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

In addition to public access to the NDCT, data can be accessed by contacting study investigators.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on iCHART/cASAP

3
Subscribe