Adding Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine for Bilateral Erector Spinae Block

January 29, 2024 updated by: Mohammed Ali Hassan Refaat AL-Quossi, Assiut University

Effects of Adding Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine for Bilateral Erector Spinae Block in Lumbar Fusion Surgeries

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effect of bilateral US-guided ESPB using bupivacaine alone versus bupivacaine and DEX in lumbar fusion surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Surgical treatment of adult lumbar spinal disorders is associated with a substantial risk of perioperative complications. The improvement in management and the development of new techniques in anesthesia and surgical sciences have led to substantial reduction of complications related to lumbar spine surgeries.

Understanding these complications is important and valuable for both the patient and the surgeon. Nevertheless, complications represent undesirable consequences of lumbar spine surgery in adult patients.

Degenerative lumbar disease is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. The general incidence of lumbar stenosis accompanied by a significant deterioration in the quality of life reaches 5 % among patients aged < 50 years and approximately 10 - 15 % among elderly patients (50 - 70 years old) Moreover, lumbar stenosis appears to be one of the most common causes of decompression and fusion interventions in the lumbar spine in > 50 years old patients Lumbar surgeries refer to any type of surgical intervention involving any lumbar spine or lower back (between one or more of the L1 - S1 level), including operations for trauma and deformity. The complexity of procedures leads to an increase in comorbidities Major lumbar spine surgery causes severe postoperative pain, which typically persists for at least three days Risk factors most frequently associated with mortality include but are not limited to patients' age, sex, and comorbidity status Postoperative pain is one of the most troublesome pains for the surgical patients and is one of the causes of morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Various studies have reported that maximal pain occurs in the first 4 postoperative hours and gradually declines by the third postoperative day .

Opiates and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been routinely used across the world. Recent resurge of regional anesthetic techniques offer some advantages, especially reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting and less sedation .

Ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane blockade (ESPB) was first developed by Forero in 2016 as an easy and safe way of managing thoracic neuropathic pain. Since that time, this block has gained in popularity and has been used to effectively provide analgesia for a variety of surgeries, including spine surgery .

Erector spinae plane blockade may also have a better safety profile when compared with neuraxial analgesia, perhaps because of direct visualization of the needle under ultrasonography guidance and the ease of placement, although this has not been decisively proven One disadvantage of this block is the short duration of action after a single injection Dexmedetomidine (DEX), is a highly selective and potent central alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist. Administration of this adjuvant in miscellaneous methods has received considerable attention in recent years Due to its analgesic and sedative effects, besides the lack of any respiratory-sparing effects, administration of this adjuvant is effective in reducing the need for opioids in the perioperative period and may even result in cooperative sedation.

The neuraxial administration of dexmedetomidine has nociceptive effects on somatic and visceral pains. It also reduces postoperative pain and prolongs analgesia.

Local anesthetic combined with DEX has been reported to prolong analgesia following several blocks. However, it is presently unclear whether adjuncts such as DEX will significantly prolong the duration of ESPB in lumbar fusion surgery.

Oxidative stress is a condition caused by an imbalance between the production and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body's ability to detoxify these products.

An excess of ROS causes damage to all cellular components. The process of oxidative stress causes the peroxidation of lipids and proteins, the formation of lipid peroxides, DNA fragmentation, and the development of cell death.

ROS activity is usually assessed indirectly by measuring stable products derived from the interaction of these radicals with cellular components. The most-studied cellular antioxidants are superoxide dismutase (SOD) , glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1) and human malondialdehyde (MDA).

These enzymes provide the first line of defense against tissue damage caused by ROS. As part of the antioxidant pathway, SOD accelerates the conversion of superoxide to H2O2, while catalase and GPX convert H2O2 to water. SOD and GPX can be measured in serum or plasma to establish the levels of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity of the body.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both genders
  • age between 18-65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II**
  • scheduled for lumbar spine fusion surgeries ( 2 or 3 level lumbar fusion with or without decompression ) under general anesthesia .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patient with chronic use of opioid analgesia.
  • Uncooperative patients with communication difficulties, which might prevent a reliable postoperative assessment.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia (bleeding disorder, use of any anticoagulants, local infection).

Known allergy to local anesthetics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dexmedetomidine group
Patients will receive US-guided ESPB with 18 mL of bupivacaine 0.25 % and 1 μg/kg DEX diluted with saline to reach total volume 20 mL per side.
1 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine per side in erector spinae block
Other Names:
  • DEX
18 mL of bupivacaine 0.25 % per side in erector spinae block
Other Names:
  • Bup
Experimental: Bupivacaine group
Patients will receive US-guided ESPB with 18 mL of bupivacaine 0.25 % and 2 mL normal saline 0.9 % per side as control group.
18 mL of bupivacaine 0.25 % per side in erector spinae block
Other Names:
  • Bup
2 ml normal saline 0.9% per side in erector spinae block
Other Names:
  • Normal saline sodium chloride 0.9%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the cummulative opioid consumption during first 48 h postoperatively.
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively.
48 hours postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in stress marker Super Oxide Dismutase (SOD) .
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative.
Change in stress marker Super Oxide Dismutase (SOD) level in serum after centrifugation between preoperative at time of cannulation and 24h. Postoperative.
24 hours postoperative.
Postoperative pain score using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
immediately postoperative

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in stress marker Glutathione peroxidase 1
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative.
Change in stress marker Glutathione peroxidase 1 level in serum after centrifugation between preoperative at time of cannulation and 24h. Postoperative.
24 hours postoperative.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

3
Subscribe