Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound Guided Block in Sleeve Gastrectomy

February 2, 2024 updated by: ilke dolğun, Biruni University

Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies: Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

Comparison of pain conditions in the first 24 hours after surgery in terms of two different analgesia methods

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction and purpose:

Morbid obesity (MO) is a disease that has become a worldwide epidemic, and in the last three decades, the average body mass index (BMI) has increased by 0.4 kg/m2 per decade worldwide. Parallel to this situation, the number of obesity surgery operations is increasing steadily. In 2017, this number reached 228,000 surgeries in the United States. In particular, due to its technical simplicity and positive outcomes, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the dominant bariatric operation, accounting for approximately 60% of all bariatric procedures (1) These individuals are at high risk for postoperative adverse respiratory events, nosocomial infections, cardiovascular complications, and pulmonary embolism (the second leading cause of death in the bariatric surgery population). Therefore, given the increasing number of patients living with obesity and seeking elective weight loss surgery, it is crucial to understand and optimize the analgesic requirements of this patient population. However, no ideal analgesic regimen exists for this patient population and limited evidence-based recommendations (2) Pain management of the MO patient is an evolving issue and remains extremely important in terms of patient safety and possible addiction risk. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial to encouraging early walking and deep breathing, which are known to reduce the risk of complications. Multimodal analgesia has been advocated by many authors as part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs to reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative pain (3).

Similar to the increase in the number of MOs over the past three decades, opioid use has also increased dramatically. In the United States, opioid overdose has become the leading cause of unintentional death, surpassing motor vehicle crashes. Frequently, the first exposure to opioids may occur during the perioperative period of an elective surgery. It has been reported that approximately 6-8% of opioid-naïve patients undergoing non-cancer procedures develop new persistent opioid use (1). Increased opiate use is associated with increased rates of delirium, ileus, urinary retention, and respiratory depression and may have strong addictive potential. Opioid-induced cardiopulmonary arrest usually occurs within the first 24 hours of surgery (3). Therefore, the surgical team has a critical role in patient management in terms of opioid-independent analgesia control.

To optimize pain control, multimodal anesthesia and regional analgesia have become key components of improved clinical recovery pathways and therefore recommended methods for perioperative pain control. One of these is the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, whose effectiveness has been proven in this patient group.

TAP blocks are widely used for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in various abdominal and gynecological surgeries. There is evidence in the literature that TAP blocks are beneficial in laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgeries such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hernia repair and laparoscopic colorectal resection (4-8). Similarly, in two of the studies demonstrating the feasibility of TAP blocks in laparoscopic bariatric surgery (9,10), it was shown that there was a decrease in pain scores and in another (9) it was shown that it reduced opioid consumption.

Traditionally, the TAP block is completed by an anesthesiologist at the beginning or end of surgery, using ultrasound guidance to improve the accuracy of visualization of the target anatomy and the spread of local anesthesia within the application area (US-TAP). However, in recent years, a new technique has been developed and started to be used during laparoscopic surgery, in which the surgeon can perform the TAP block under direct visualization: laparoscopy-guided TAP block (L-TAP). Numerous studies and technical reports describe this laparoscopic-assisted technique. Studies have shown that laparoscopic-assisted TAP blocks result in similar pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption but lead to shorter block performance time compared to ultrasound-guided block (11). Additionally, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the pain scores and opioid consumption of patients receiving laparoscopic-assisted TAP block compared to controls (12,13). Similarly, in a meta-analysis, it was stated that L-TAP provided comparable analgesia to US-TAP, and there was no statistically significant difference in pain scores at different times and during both rest and movement (14). According to the same meta-analysis, patients in most studies achieved adequate pain control, and 24-hour opioid consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, functional recovery, bowel function, and hospital stay rates did not differ significantly between the 2 methods.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Istinye University
        • Contact:
          • ilke dolgun

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

50 patients over the age of 18 who will undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who can tolerate general anesthesia and pneumoperitoneum.
  • Patients who can give informed consent for surgery.
  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • patients with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients allergic to local anesthetics.
  • Patients with serious underlying cardiovascular disease (e.g. congestive heart failure, conduction disorders and ischemic heart disease).
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 or greater (creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min).
  • Patients who have had previous abdominal surgery, including resection of the esophagus, stomach, liver and pancreas.
  • Patients with chronic pain and chronic opioid use
  • Patients with ASA class IV
  • patients with psychiatric disorders
  • pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • patients with a history of seizures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
laparoscopic block
laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block
Postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block
ultrasound guided block
ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block
Postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 4 month
postoperative pain
4 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 24, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • istinye

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on postoperative pain

3
Subscribe