Validity and Reliability of the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (12-WS) in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury (12-WS SCI)

March 22, 2024 updated by: University of Zurich
Established gait assessments for subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) (6MWT, 10MWT, TUG, SCIM III and WISCI II) are widely used in the clinical and research setting. So far, no valid measurement exists that assesses the patients' perspective of walking ability in SCI. As there is the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (12-WS) to assess the patients' perspective on gait ability in patients with multiple sclerosis, it is hypothesized that the 12-WS would also be a valid instrument for subjects with incomplete SCI. The main goal of this study is to collect data from clinical gait assessments in subjects with spinal lesions and to demonstrate that the 12-WS is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measurement for individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic spinal cord injury (>6 months; cervical or thoracic motor incomplete traumatic or non-traumatic (AIS C, D) above T12
  • Must have impaired walking function as demonstrated by neurological examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Current orthopaedic problems of lower limbs
  • History of major cardiac condition (e.g., infarction, insufficiency (NYHA II-IV))
  • History of major pulmonary condition (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD II-IV
  • Current major depression or psychosis
  • Participation in another interventional study (except specTra-study) that may have an impact on walking function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patients with incomplete spinal cord injury
The subject has to perform different gait assessments and fill out the 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale questionnaire in one visit. Maximum 8 weekes after the first visit the subject has to fill out the same questionnaire again.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Re-test reliability of the subjective perceived limitations in ambulation of the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (12-WS) in subjects with incomplete SCI.
Time Frame: Change from day 1 to day 2
The scale is numeric and ranges from 0-100. A lower score means a better outcome.
Change from day 1 to day 2
Validity of the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (12-WS) in subjects with incomplete SCI.
Time Frame: Day 1
The scale is numeric and ranges from 0-100. A lower score means a better outcome.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical examination (a neurological examination including the ASIA score (categoric outcome grade A-E) - International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: Day 1
Grade "A" means most impaired, grade "E" means less impaired.
Day 1
Walking impairment (numeric value from 0-20) - WISCI II
Time Frame: Day 1
The scale is numeric and ranges from 0-20. A higher score means a better outcome.
Day 1
Walking distance (m) and number of rests - 6MWT
Time Frame: Day 1
High distance and low number of rests means better outcome.
Day 1
Walking speed (m/s) - 10-meter walkint test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Day 1
High speed means better outcome.
Day 1
Walking speed including sit-stand transfer (s) - Timed Up and Go-test (TUG)
Time Frame: Day 1
The fewer seconds needed, the better the outcome.
Day 1
Functional independence (numeric value from 0-40) - Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III), Items 9-17
Time Frame: Day 1
The scale is numeric and ranges from 0-30). A higher score means a better outcome.
Day 1
Dynamic balance (numeric value from 0-30) - Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Time Frame: Day 1
The scale is numeric and ranges from 0-30). A higher score means a better outcome.
Day 1
Change in impairment level (nominal outcome Yes - No) - Follow up questions in telephone interview
Time Frame: Day 2, maximum 8 weeks after day 1
Only subjects with NO changes in impairment level will be used for reliability testing.
Day 2, maximum 8 weeks after day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Björn Zörner, PD Dr., University of Zurich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on 12 MSWS questionnaire

3
Subscribe