- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06275087
Differences in Speed of Recovery From Anesthesia for Intraoral Surgery (PSIOS)
Differences in Speed of Recovery From Anesthesia and Recovery of Muscle Strength in General Balanced Inhalation Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Intraoral Surgery - Clinical Randomised Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two groups of patients going in general anesthesia for intraoral surgery, the first group TIVA with propofol and the second group inhalational with sevoflurane. The main questions it aims to answer are to asses speed and quality of recovery from general anesthesia.
Participants will fill out a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of recovery from anesthesia using the QoR-40 1h, 24h, and 30 days after waking up from anesthesia in comparison to the results of the same questionnaire before surgery. Also, the investigators will perform a hand grip and bite strength test on the patients after waking up from anesthesia in the operating room, after 1 hour in the recovery room, and after 24 hours compared to preoperative values.
The investigators will compare TIVA and Volatile groups to see if there are any differences in recovery seed, muscle strength recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and shivering between groups.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee of KBC Zagreb and the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Zagreb, the research will be conducted at KBC Zagreb.
Criteria for patient inclusion are:
- patients older than 18 years
- ASA status 1-3,
- Patients who have an indication for an intraoral surgical procedure longer than 30 minutes.
- patients who agreed to the research and signed the consent
Exclusion criteria are:
- ASA status higher than 3,
- the need for postoperative care in the ICU,
- surgery lasting more than 2 hours,
- known allergies to drugs used in the trial,
- refusal to participate Participants will be randomly divided according to a predetermined randomization table (32) into the TIVA group and the Volatile group. After identification of the participants in the operating room, participants will be fitted with a peripheral venous line, electrocardiogram monitoring, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, pulse oximeter, capnograph, temperature probe, and bispectral index (BIS) of the electroencephalogram and neuromuscular monitoring, kinemiography with train-of-four (TOF , M-NMT, Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA,) by recording the responses.
The initial anesthesiological induction procedure will not differ in both groups of patients. The drugs that will be used are sufentanil 0.3mcg/kg, propofol 2mg/kg, and cisatracurium 0.1mg/kg.
Participants will be intubated with an endotracheal tube and mechanically ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air (inspiratory fraction of oxygen 40%) with a total flow of gas mixture of 3 L/min.
Anesthesia will be maintained in the volatile group with the inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane and single doses of cisatracurium. Cisatracurium will be repeated when the TOF ratio is greater than 5%, and the repeat dose will be 0.01 mg/kg. The depth of anesthesia will be controlled by BIS, maintaining values between 25 and 50. Recommended drug doses will be guided by TOF and BIS values.
In the TIVA group, anesthesia will be maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol (5-10 mg/kg/h) and single doses of cisatracurium. Cisatracurium will be repeated when the TOF ratio is greater than 5%, and the repeat dose will be 0.01 mg/kg. The depth of anesthesia will be controlled by BIS, maintaining values between 25 and 50. Recommended drug doses will be guided by TOF and BIS values.
At the end of the surgical intervention in both groups, the neuromuscular block will be antagonized with prostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) along with atropine (0.01 mg/kg) as soon as the patient begins to breathe spontaneously. Patients will then be extubated when the TOF index is greater than 90%
Muscle strength of all participants will be measured with a JAMAR hand dynamometer, and bite force with a gnathodynamometer (Bite force sensor, Monad electronics) in four time intervals:
- Before introduction to anesthesia
- After waking up from anesthesia in the operating room
- 1 hour after waking up from anesthesia in the recovery room
- After 24 hours from the operation
All patients will fill out the Quality of recovery-40 (Qor-40) questionnaire for assessing the quality of recovery after anesthesia and surgery in four time intervals:
- Before introduction to anesthesia
- 1 hour after waking up from anesthesia in the recovery room
- After 24 hours from the operation
- After 30 days from the operation Consent for the use of the QoR-40 questionnaire was obtained by the main researcher from the author, Professor P.S. Myles, and Dr. M. Miklić Bublić, who translated the questionnaire into Croatian.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative shivering will also be recorded.
In the perioperative period, all participants will be placed in the department of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery, where they will all receive the same postoperative care.
For a test power of 80% and the use of an independent t-test for the primary objective and x2 test for the secondary objective with a statistical significance of 0.05, it is necessary to include 42 patients, 21 subjects per group. The test for power calculation is G Power Version 3.1.9.6)(33). And the results will be processed with IBM SPSS statistics v27.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ivan Šitum, MD
- Phone Number: 0915143620
- Email: ivsitum@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
- Recruiting
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb
-
Contact:
- Ivan Šitum
- Phone Number: 0915143620
- Email: ivsitum@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ivan Šitum
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients older than 18 years
- ASA status 1-3,
- Patients who have an indication for an intraoral surgical procedure longer than 30 minutes.
- patients who agreed to the research and signed the consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA status higher than 3,
- the need for postoperative care in the ICU,
- surgery lasting more than 2 hours,
- known allergies to drugs used in the trial,
- refusal to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: TIVA group
The study involves patients in an operating room undergoing standard procedures. The induction procedure for anesthesia is the same for both groups, using sufentanil, propofol, and cisatracurium. In the TIVA group, anesthesia is maintained with continuous propofol infusion and intermittent cisatracurium doses, guided by neuromuscular and electroencephalogram monitoring. At the end of surgery, neuromuscular block is reversed, and extubation occurs when the train-of-four (TOF) index is over 90%. Muscle strength and bite force are measured at different intervals before and after anesthesia, using specific instruments. Additionally, patients fill out the Quality of recovery-40 (Qor-40) questionnaire at various time points to assess the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia. |
The experimental group will not receive volatile anesthetic, instead, they will receive propofol infusion
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Volatile group
In the volatile group, anesthesia is maintained with inhaled sevoflurane and intermittent cisatracurium doses.
Cisatracurium is repeated based on TOF ratio, and anesthesia depth is controlled by BIS, maintaining values between 25 and 50.
Drug doses are adjusted according to TOF and BIS values.
|
The control group will not receive TIVA, instead, they will receive sevoflurane via inhalation
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
"Quality of recovery from anesthesia" QoR-40 questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 hour, 24 hour, 30 day
|
The QoR-40 is a recovery-specific and patient-rated questionnaire that contains 40 items measuring five dimensions: the physical comfort (12 items), emotional state (nine items), physical independence (five items), psychological support (seven items) and pain (seven items).
The total score and subscales of the QoR-40 are measured using a five-point Likert scale (for positive items: 1 = none of the time, 5 = all of the time; for negative items, the scoring was reversed) and individual scores are then added together, with the minimum score being 40 points and the maximum score being 200 points.
The QoR-40 was specifically designed to measure a patient's health status after surgery and anesthesia, and its completion time generally ranges from three to 10 min.
The Japanese version of the QoR-40 was also validated according to standard methods of cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis in 2011.
|
1 hour, 24 hour, 30 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
bite strength and hand grip strength
Time Frame: after waking in OR up to 10 min, 1 hour after waking, 24 hour after waking
|
Hand-grip muscle strength and bite strength will be measured with a dynamometer on three occasions: before general anesthesia, in the early post-anesthesia period in the operating room, and 24 hours after anesthesia.
|
after waking in OR up to 10 min, 1 hour after waking, 24 hour after waking
|
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
determine the difference in the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting
|
24 hours
|
Postoperative shivering
Time Frame: 2 hour
|
determine the difference in the frequency of postoperative shivering
|
2 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ivan Šitum, MD, UHC Zagreb
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
- Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
- Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019 Mar;74(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/anae.14569. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
- Kim DH, Min KT, Kim EH, Choi YS, Choi SH. Comparison of the effects of inhalational and total intravenous anesthesia on quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;19(6):1056-1064. doi: 10.7150/ijms.72758. eCollection 2022.
- Diniz JA, Siqueira ADS, Araujo GM, Faro TF, Torres LHS, Oliveira E Silva ED, Laureano Filho JR. Intraoral Approach for Surgical Treatment of Psammomatoid Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 May/Jun;31(3):e306-e309. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006171.
- Ferreira, C. C., Pereira, M. B. F., Bruzinga, F. F. B., Castro, H. H. O., Souto, G. R., Souza, P. E. A., & De Oliveira, L. J. (2022, September). AN UNUSUAL INTRAORAL LIPOMA: A CASE REPORT. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 134(3), e119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.212
- Frerich, B. (2020). Complications in Maxillofacial Tumor Surgery. Complications in Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40150-4_13
- Tamunobelema, D. M. S., & Uruaka, C. I. (2023, March 11). General Anaesthetic Agents and its Implication on the Cardiovascular System: A Systemic Review. Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(03), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i03.006
- Qurbani, B., & Karim, S. B. (2022, December 29). Comparison among complications of common intravenous anesthetic drugs during general anesthesia for patients undergoing surgery in Sulaimani city. Annals of the College of Medicine, Mosul, 44(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.33899/mmed.2022.136178.1166
- Fiorda-Diaz, J., Stoicea, N., & Bergese, S. (2017). Anesthetic Agents. Essentials of Neuroanesthesia, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805299-0.00007-5
- Hao X, Ou M, Zhang D, Zhao W, Yang Y, Liu J, Yang H, Zhu T, Li Y, Zhou C. The Effects of General Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(10):936-965. doi: 10.2174/1570159X18666200227125854.
- Monisha, B., Madhusudhana, R., & Sujatha, M. (2023). Effects of Isoflurane versus Propofol for Postoperative Neurocognitive Recovery in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Study. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/62147.17888
- Saha, D. S. C., & Seraji, D. S. I. (2023, April 16). A Comparative Study of Propofol and Sevoflurane for General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 11(04), 753-757. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2023.v11i04.014
- Yang L, Chen Z, Xiang D. Effects of intravenous anesthesia with sevoflurane combined with propofol on intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative stress disorder and cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Oct;38(7):1938-1944. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.7.5763.
- Miao L, Lv X, Huang C, Li P, Sun Y, Jiang H. Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268473. eCollection 2022.
- Zhou, Y., & Xu, T. (2022, January 24). Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on perioperative and postoperative outcomes in lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic surgery. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 20(4), 873-879. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v20i4.30
- Wu L, Li Y, Si J. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with colorectal cancer placed under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(6):2963-2972. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-783.
- Miklic Bublic M, Miklic P, Barl P, Matas M, Sekulic A. CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION. Acta Clin Croat. 2021 Jun;60(2):237-245. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.02.09.
- Meng W, Yang C, Wei X, Wang S, Kang F, Huang X, Li J. Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y.
- Shi CM, Zhou Y, Yang N, Li ZQ, Tao YF, Deng Y, Guo XY. [Quality of psychomotility recovery after propofol sedation for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Apr 18;55(2):324-327. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.017. Chinese.
- Kim SH, Ju HM, Choi CH, Park HR, Shin S. Inhalational versus intravenous maintenance of anesthesia for quality of recovery in patients undergoing corrective lower limb osteotomy: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247089. eCollection 2021.
- Tomita S, Matsuura N, Ichinohe T. The combined effects of midazolam and propofol sedation on muscle power. Anaesthesia. 2013 May;68(5):478-83. doi: 10.1111/anae.12172. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
- Wen LL, Lin WQ, Zhao WX, Li GC, Bai XH, Xiao JB. [Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on neuromuscular blockade by continuous cisatracurium infusion]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Jan;30(1):163-5. Chinese.
- Man, Mi, & Han. (2011, September 1). Influence of sevoflurane and propofol on the neuromuscular block effect of cisatracurium. Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 36, 973-975. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Influence-of-sevoflurane-and-propofol-on-the-block-Man-Mi/eb40663a5683c9cc22116520104ca02a66c8b6de#citing-papers
- Pan, C., Xing, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Shi, L., Xu, M., & Zhang, B. (2023, June 6). Combined remifentanil/sevoflurane in paediatric tonsil surgery anesthesia: Effect on recovery time of respiration and consciousness in paediatric patients. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 22(5), 1073-1079. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i5.20
- Interlandi C, Di Pietro S, Costa GL, Spadola F, Iannelli NM, Macri D, Ferrantelli V, Macri F. Effects of Cisatracurium in Sevoflurane and Propofol Requirements in Dog-Undergoing-Mastectomy Surgery. Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;12(22):3134. doi: 10.3390/ani12223134.
- Liu J, Yang L. Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on blood glucose, hemodynamics, and inflammatory factors of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2020 Feb;19(2):1187-1194. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11201. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
- ALKAYA SOLMAZ, F., & KIRDEMİR, P. (2020, March 2). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and anesthesia. Acta Medica Alanya, 4(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.587027
- Bennett J, McDonald T, Lieblich S, Piecuch J. Perioperative rehydration in ambulatory anesthesia for dentoalveolar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Sep;88(3):279-84. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70028-4.
- Pollard BJ, Bryan A, Bennett D, Faragher EB, Un EN, Keegan M, Wilson A, Burkill M, Beatty PC, Stollery BT, et al. Recovery after oral surgery with halothane, enflurane, isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994 May;72(5):559-66. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.5.559.
- Asakura A, Mihara T, Goto T. The Effect of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate or Oral Rehydration Solution on Postoperative Quality of Recovery: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0133309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133309. eCollection 2015.
- Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Wiley; in 1983
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- situm1phd
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intraoral Tumor
-
University of SheffieldNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingTime and Cost-implications of Intraoral Scans vs Alginate Impressions: A Randomised Controlled TrialChairside Time and Costs Associated With Intraoral Scanning Versus Alginate ImpressionsUnited Kingdom
-
Nihon UniversityUnknownRelationship Between Electrical Pain Tolerance Threshold of Alveolar Ridge and Individual AttributesIntraoral Pain ThresholdJapan
-
Marwa Mohamed AliUnknownPeriodontal Bone Defects Will be Detected and Measured by 2 Techniques CBCT and Intraoral Digital Radiography to Compare the Accuracy of These Techniques
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteTHOR Photomedicine LtdRecruitingOral Mucositis | Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation | Intraoral Photobiomodulation Therapy | Mucosal UlcerUnited States
-
Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.WithdrawnSolid Tumor | Relapsed Solid Tumor | Refractory Tumor
-
Aadi Bioscience, Inc.RecruitingAdvanced Solid Tumor | Tumor | Tumor, SolidUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruitingSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, AdultUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterLincoln Medical and Mental Health CenterRecruitingSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, AdultUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterLincoln Medical and Mental Health CenterRecruitingSolid Tumor | Solid Tumor, Adult | Solid Tumor, Unspecified, AdultUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Yonsei UniversityMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyActive, not recruitingPD-L1 Positive Mutation Tumor | EBV Positive Mutation Tumor | MSI-H Mutation Tumor | POLE/POLD1 Mutation TumorKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Propofol
-
Hopital FochCompleted
-
Konkuk University Medical CenterCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Valvular Heart DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
University Medical Center GroningenCompletedAnesthesia | Hemodynamic Instability | Interaction | Disorder of Oxygen TransportNetherlands
-
Asan Medical CenterCompletedPopulation Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of Microemulsion Propofol in Healthy VolunteersHealthyKorea, Republic of
-
Tiva GroupMedtronic - MITGCompleted
-
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileCompletedSurgery | Anesthesia | Depth of Anesthesia | NeonateChile
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
KVG Medical College and HospitalUnknown
-
Acibadem UniversityCompleted