- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06289127
Test Properties of Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test: Effect of Verbal Instructions and Focus Techniques
The Lower Quadrant Y-Balance Test (LQYBT) is a landmark test used in assessing lower extremity performance, determining risk factors for injury, and making return-to-sport decisions. Studies have shown that the individual's focus of attention affects balance. The literature, has shown that the use of external focus is more effective than the use of internal focus in the execution of a movement.Consistent with these findings, the use of an external focus instruction during the LQYBT may lead to achieve more realistic and a higher performance outcome than the test result with standard instructions. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of using different instructions and focusing techniques on test performance on the LQYBT. The secondary aim was to investigate the reliability of the different instructions and focus tests we used for the LQYBT.
Hypothesis of the study that test performance can be further enhanced by differentiating the instructions and focus techniques. A more effective assessment of individual performance may help us to make a more realistic decision to return to sport.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a prospective cross-sectional research. A total of 52 healthy individuals participated in this study. The test protocols were compeleted in two sessions for each participant. In the first session, participants whose eligibility for the study was determined, were recorded demographic data including age, height, body weight, body mass index, lower extremity dominance, and leg length. Subsequently, the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test (LQYBT) was conducted using three different focus instructions: (1) standardized instruction, (2) internal focus instruction, (3) external focus instruction. Each focus instruction was sequentially applied three times in each direction. The three different instructions were randomized and performed in a different sequence for each participant. In second session, to assess the test-retest reliability of different focus instructions during test, the LQYBT was repeated under the same conditions three days later, by the same researcher.
To ensure normalization, the average distances measured in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions were obtained for each command, and the results were divided by the length of the leg and multiplied by 100. The total score for the dominant side in the LQYBT was determined by aggregating the average reach distance across three directions, dividing it by three times the length of the leg, and then multiplying by 100.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sıhhıye
-
Ankara, Sıhhıye, Turkey, 06430
- Hacettepe University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-35 years,
- Currently without pain in lower extremity,
- No history of lower extremity musculoskeletal problems or surgery in the last 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Had neurological, systemic, or autoimmune disorders.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Investigate the effects of using different instructions and focusing techniques on test performance on the LQYBT.
Time Frame: 40 minutes for each participant
|
To ensure normalization, the average distances measured in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions were obtained for each command, and the results were divided by the length of the leg and multiplied by 100.
The total score for the dominant side in the LQYBT was determined by aggregating the average reach distance (cm) across three directions, dividing it by three times the length of the leg, and then multiplying by 100.
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze comparisons of different instruction.
|
40 minutes for each participant
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Investigate the reliability of the different instructions and focus tests we used for the LQYBT.
Time Frame: Performed 2 times in 3 days apart, 40 minutes for each participant
|
To determine the test-retest reliability of the test results during different focus instructions, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between the scores of the first and second results of LQYBT.
The ICC value was interpreted as follows: below 0.20 indicates poor reliability; between 0.40 and 0.59 suggests satisfactory reliability; between 0.60 and 0.79 indicates very good reliability; and above 0.80 suggests excellent reliability.
|
Performed 2 times in 3 days apart, 40 minutes for each participant
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- GO 22/595
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Hasselt UniversityRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingBelgium
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingUnited States
-
Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborg UniversityCompletedHealthy | Nutrition, HealthySweden
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Diet
Clinical Trials on Lower Quarter Y Balance Test
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedBalanceUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedUpper Limb AsymmetryTurkey
-
Istanbul Gelisim UniversityIstanbul Bilgi University; Beykoz UniversityCompleted
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityNot yet recruitingAthletic Performance | Heart Rate VariabilityTurkey
-
Guven Health GroupCompletedAthletic Performance | Physical Fitness | Handball Players | Cross-sectional StudiesTurkey
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityNot yet recruitingthe Methodology of the Balance Test
-
Uskudar UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Arkansas Colleges of Health EducationRecruiting
-
Dragan MijatovićCompletedDynamic Balance, Flexibility and Agility as Predictors of Lower-extremity Injury in Football PlayersLOWER-LIMB INJURYBosnia and Herzegovina