Effect of Pilates Exercises on Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Postpartum Women

March 17, 2024 updated by: Asmaa Esam Ghareeb Hasan, Cairo University
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of Pilates exercises on diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum women.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Rectus diastasis is relatively common having negative health consequences for women during and after pregnancy (ante-and postnatal periods). Varying estimates of incidence of rectus diastasis have been reported ranging from 66% to 100% during the third trimester of pregnancy, and up to 53% immediately after delivery. Among patients with urogynecological disorders, 52% were found to have a rectus diastasis and 66% had at least one type of pelvic floor dysfunction.

A diastasis can contribute to lower back pain and strain due to other muscles being overworked or compensating for the lack of integrity of abdominals, unstable core, pelvic and back muscles, poor posture, shallow breathing and uterine prolapse. This may result in altered trunk mechanics, impaired pelvic stability and changed posture, which leave the lumbar spine and pelvis more vulnerable to injury.

Facilitation, concentric activation, and stabilization of the abdominal muscles occurred during core stability exercise are used to correct diastasis recti. Pilates has been known to improve the strength and flexibility of muscles, particularly the abdominal muscles, lower back, hip and buttocks i.e. the core musculature thus helping in improving core stability.

Uptill now, there was no previous studies have examined the impact of Pilates training on rectus abdominis diastasis in postpartum women. So, this study will be valuable benefits for medical services organizations and will increase body of knowledge of physical therapists in scientific field.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Postpartum women (7 days after delivery) having diastasis recti (separation between the two recti more than 2.5cm at the level of umbilicus).
  2. Multiparous women (2-3) times delivered vaginally with or without episiotomy.
  3. Their age ranged from 20 -35 years old.
  4. Their BMI was less than 30 kg/cm2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Abdominal or back surgery.
  2. Abdominal hernia.
  3. History of abnormal pregnancy, uterine fibroid or polyhydraminos during pregnancy.
  4. Neurological disorders as multiple sclerosis, stroke and spinal lesion.
  5. Musculoskeletal diseases such as fractures muscle strains, severe knee osteoarthritis which may affect their physical activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Abdominal belt
It consisted of 25 postpartum women who wore abdominal belt for 8 weeks.
This was used for all women in both groups (A and B) for 8 weeks starting from the 7th days after delivery. The women was asked to wear the abdominal belt throughout the day except when bathing, eating and sleeping. The binder was worn over the skin directly or on a thin layer of clothing. The side of the abdominal binder without the straps was pulled over by the woman's stomach with one hand. The side of the binder with straps was stretched across the stomach and pulled to the center of the abdomen. The straps then was fitted into the buckles. Women were instructed not to wear the binder too tight or too loose as it might irritate the skin and produce difficulty in breathing creating discomfort. They were asked to inspect their skin regularly for any signs of sensitivity.
Experimental: Abdominal belt + Pilates exercises
It consisted of 25 postpartum women who followed Pilates training program, 3 times/week for 1 hour the session in addition to wearing abdominal belt, for 8 weeks
This was used for all women in both groups (A and B) for 8 weeks starting from the 7th days after delivery. The women was asked to wear the abdominal belt throughout the day except when bathing, eating and sleeping. The binder was worn over the skin directly or on a thin layer of clothing. The side of the abdominal binder without the straps was pulled over by the woman's stomach with one hand. The side of the binder with straps was stretched across the stomach and pulled to the center of the abdomen. The straps then was fitted into the buckles. Women were instructed not to wear the binder too tight or too loose as it might irritate the skin and produce difficulty in breathing creating discomfort. They were asked to inspect their skin regularly for any signs of sensitivity.
The Pilates exercise program for the study group (B) consisted of a 10-minute warm-up with low-intensity exercises, followed by a 40-minute central part with floor exercises like leg circles, kicks, and stretches. It included the classic "hundred" exercise, performed with proper form. Each exercise had two sets of 10 repetitions. The session ended with a 10-minute cool-down of stretching exercises, supervised by a physical therapist. The program was conducted three times per week, one hour per session, for eight weeks, starting from the 7th day after delivery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of separation between the two-rectus abdominis muscles above the umbilicus at rest
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The distance between the recti muscles was measured 4.5 cm above the umbilicus at rest at the beginning and again at the end of the study duration.
8 weeks
Measurement of separation between the two-rectus abdominis muscles above the umbilicus during contraction
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The distance between the recti muscles was measured 4.5 cm above the umbilicus during contraction at the beginning and again at the end of the study duration.
8 weeks
Measurement of separation between the two-rectus abdominis muscles at level of the umbilicus at rest
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The distance between the recti muscles was measured at level of the umbilicus at rest at the beginning and again at the end of the study duration.
8 weeks
Measurement of separation between the two-rectus abdominis muscles at level of the umbilicus during contraction
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The distance between the recti muscles was measured at level of the umbilicus during contraction at the beginning and again at the end of the study duration.
8 weeks
Measurement of separation between the two-rectus abdominis muscles below the umbilicus at rest
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The distance between the recti muscles was measured 4.5 cm below the umbilicus at rest at the beginning and again at the end of the study duration.
8 weeks
Measurement of separation between the two-rectus abdominis muscles below the umbilicus during contraction
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The distance between the recti muscles was measured 4.5 cm below the umbilicus during contraction at the beginning and again at the end of the study duration.
8 weeks
Assessment of trunk flexion strength
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Trunk flexion strength was graded from 0 to 5 using Daniels and Worthingham's procedure before and after the end of the study program. For grades 3-5, the patient curled up through the full range of motion until the scapulae cleared the table. For grade 2, the patient just lifted their head off the table. For grades 0 and 1, the therapist used assisted forward lean or coughing techniques while palpating the rectus abdominis.
8 weeks
Assessment of static trunk flexion endurance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
It was tested before and after the end of the study program by adopting the most challenging position that was achieved in the strength test, and instructing the participating women to hold that position as long as possible. Standardized verbal encouragement was provided by the assessor, and the holding time was determined using a stopwatch. Three repetitions of the static endurance test were performed with at least 3 minutes of rest between trials; the best (longest holding time) of the three trials was used to represent the participant's endurance. The same position used to evaluate trunk flexion endurance at the initial evaluation was used in subsequent evaluations, even if the woman's strength grade improved between evaluations.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of functional status
Time Frame: 8 weeks
All participating women with diastasis recti in both groups (A & B) were asked to fill the Inventory of functional status after childbirth questionnaire before and after the end of the study program. This questionnaire includes five domains and 36 items, that is, infant care (6 items), personal care (8 items), household activities (12 items), social and community activities (6 items), and occupational activities (4 items). The questionnaire was rated on a 4-point Likert scale and the mean score was calculated with one point being the lowest and four points being the highest scores possible. Higher scores indicated better functional status.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Azza BN Kassab, Prof., Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diastasis Recti

Clinical Trials on Abdominal belt

3
Subscribe