Screening Study of Combined Sequential Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Early-stage NK/T-cell Lymphoma

March 13, 2024 updated by: Rong Tao, Fudan University

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Screening Study of Combined Sequential Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapies for Early-stage Natural Killer/T-cell Lymphoma (IE/IIE)

Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (NKTCL) is a common malignant tumor in East Asian populations, often starting in the nasal cavity and spreading to other organs. Associated with EBV infection, NKTCL is aggressive. Early-stage patients typically receive chemo and radiotherapy, with promising outcomes. Recent studies show the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NKTCL treatment. However, optimal treatment sequencing and efficacy remain unclear. This study aims to compare three strategies: (A) Pegaspargase with Sintilimab and radiotherapy; (B) chemo then radiotherapy (PGemOx); (C) sandwich chemoradiotherapy (GELAD). The goal is to identify the best treatment based on 24-month progression-free survival.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (NKTCL) is a malignant hematological tumor that is common in East Asian populations. The disease typically manifests in the nasal cavity in its early stages and can later involve multiple organs throughout the body. Highly associated with EBV infection, NKTCL is known for its aggressive nature. Currently, early-stage patients usually undergo combined treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recent studies have shown that combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy containing asparaginase can achieve a complete remission rate (CR) of over 80%, with long-term survival rates exceeding 70% for patients. In recent years, researchers have found that immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate high activity in NKTCL, becoming an important therapeutic option. However, it is worth noting that the optimal sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as the effectiveness of combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy, have not been defined. Studies on different treatment strategies have shown variations in treatment-related adverse reactions and compliance with regimens among patients. However, there is currently no prospective randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of different strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to identify a treatment strategy with good efficacy and tolerability for patients. This study will stratify early-stage NKTCL patients using the NRI scoring system and randomly assign them to three different treatment strategies: (A) asparaginase combined with Sintilimab and synchronous radiotherapy; (B) sequential chemotherapy (PGemOx) followed by radiotherapy ; (C) chemotherapy (GELAD) with sandwiched chemoradiotherapy, to identify the best or worst treatment strategy based on the 24-month progression-free survival rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

210

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rong Tao, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for NKTCL (WHO-2016) based on pathological examination.
  • Primary lesions located in the upper respiratory and digestive tract such as the nasal cavity, sinuses, nasopharynx, oropharynx, or oral cavity, with clinical staging of IE/IIE based on PET/CT and bone marrow examination according to the Lugano 2014 criteria.
  • Evaluated for lymphoma response according to the Lugano 2014 criteria, with at least one measurable lesion or lesion assessable by PET/CT.
  • No prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological therapy for lymphoma.
  • Age between 18 and 75 years, both genders.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) score of 0-2.
  • Must have adequate organ and bone marrow function, defined as follows:

Hematology: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.0×10^9/L, platelet count (PLT) ≥75×10^9/L, hemoglobin (Hb) ≥90g/L; no administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, platelet transfusion, or red blood cell transfusion in the previous 14 days.

Liver function: Total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2×ULN.

Renal function: Serum creatinine (Cr) ≤1.5×ULN. Coagulation function: Plasma fibrinogen ≥1.5g/L. Cardiac function: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%, no acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or atrioventricular conduction block of grade I or above on electrocardiogram.

  • Willing to comply with the study protocol, follow-up plan, and laboratory and ancillary investigations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients co-infected with HCV, HIV, or HBV with plasma HBV-DNA >10^3/ml.
  • Patients with a history of pancreatitis.
  • Patients with acute or systemic infections requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy.
  • Patients with severe complications such as hemophagocytic syndrome, DIC, etc.
  • Significant organ dysfunction: such as respiratory failure, chronic congestive heart failure with NYHA class ≥2, decompensated liver or renal dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes despite aggressive treatment, and cardiovascular thrombotic or hemorrhagic events in the past 6 months.
  • Patients with a history of autoimmune diseases who are not suitable for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders.
  • Known allergies to drugs in the chemotherapy regimen.
  • Patients with concomitant other tumors requiring surgery or chemotherapy within the past 6 months.
  • Currently using other experimental drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A (synchronous treatment group)
Patients received 4 cycles of Sintilimab combined with pegaspargase therapy, with each cycle lasting 3 weeks, for a total of 4 cycles. Concurrently, they received radiotherapy treatment (IMRT, 50-56Gy, starting within 21 days after the first Sintilimab treatment).
  1. Sintilimab, 200mg intravenous drip, on day 1;
  2. pegaspargase, 2000U/m^2, capped at 3750U, intramuscular, day 1;
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (50-56Gy)
Experimental: Group B (sequential treatment group)
Patients received 4 cycles of the PGEMOX regimen chemotherapy. Each cycle lasted 3 weeks, with sequential radiotherapy (IMRT, 50-56Gy) administered within 4 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle.
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (50-56Gy)
  1. pegaspargase 2000U/m^2, capped at 3750U on day 1, intramuscular;
  2. gemcitabine 1.0g/m^2 on day 1 and day 8, intravenous drip;
  3. oxaliplatin 130mg/m^2 on day 1, intravenous drip
Experimental: Group C (sandwiched radiotherapy group)
Patients received 2 cycles of the GELAD regimen chemotherapy initially, with each cycle lasting 3 weeks. After the second cycle of chemotherapy, radiotherapy (IMRT, 50-56Gy) was administered within 4 weeks. Following the completion of radiotherapy, they received an additional 2 cycles of the GELAD regimen chemotherapy.
Intensity modulated radiotherapy (50-56Gy)
  1. gemcitabine 1.0g/m^2 on day 1, intravenous drip;
  2. etoposide 60mg/m^2 on day 1-3, intravenous drip;
  3. pegaspargase 2000U/m^2, capped at 3750U on day 1,intramuscular;
  4. dexamethasone 20mg on day 1-4, intravenous drip.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFS24
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 24 months by the Lugano 2014 response criteria.
Rate of patients with 24-month progression-free survival
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 24 months by the Lugano 2014 response criteria.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ORR
Time Frame: response rate at 24th week
Overall response rate
response rate at 24th week
OS
Time Frame: From the time of patient randomization to the end of study, assessed up to 60 months
Overall survival
From the time of patient randomization to the end of study, assessed up to 60 months
EFS
Time Frame: From the time of patient randomization to the end of study, assessed up to 60 months
Event-free survival
From the time of patient randomization to the end of study, assessed up to 60 months
TRAE
Time Frame: From the time of patient randomization to the end of study, assessed up to 60 months
Treatment-related adverse event related to the study drug or intervention
From the time of patient randomization to the end of study, assessed up to 60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rong Tao, MD, Fudan Cancer Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal and Nasal-Type

Clinical Trials on Sintilimab+Pegaspargase

3
Subscribe