The Anticariogenic Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Sodium Fluoride Varnish

March 11, 2024 updated by: Nur Amalina Asmad, Universiti Teknologi Mara

The Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Sodium Fluoride Varnish on Salivary pH and Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacillus in Early Childhood Caries: A Randomized Control Trial

Sodium Fluoride (NAF) varnish was considered as the treatment of Early Childhood Caries (ECC). However, the emergence of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) has become more popular to tackle dental caries among children. SDF has silver ions that harbor antibacterial properties that play a crucial role in arresting active, cavitated carious lesions and has fluoride ions that are important in remineralizing enamel and dentin. This randomized control trial aims to compare the effect of SDF and NaF varnish on the salivary pH and density of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. 49 subjects below 6 years old, attending dental treatment at the Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) were recruited and were divided into two groups of treatment: 38% SDF or 5% SDF. Saliva samples of each subject were collected to test for salivary pH and density of S. mutans and Lactobacillus before the treatment and after 3 months of treatment. The salivary pH were tested using a calibrated pH meter. Saliva samples were subjected to microbiological analysis using Colony Forming Unit (CFU) and quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) technique. The findings of this study will be used to support the use of SDF as an alternative to NaF varnish and to develop a recommendation guideline on the clinical use of SDF in ECC management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

ECC continues to become a significant oral health concern owing to its high prevalence worldwide despite the preventive measures taken, including excessive oral health promotion. While conventional tooth restoration has been widely accepted as a standard intervention in managing ECC, the traumatic effects it causes may lead to dental fear, which prevents children from receiving dental treatment and subsequently leads to caries sequelae and complications. There is well-established evidence-based research proving the benefits of fluoride-based products in preventing dental caries. Previously, caries prevention in ECC was widely considered to be due to sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish. However, a systematic review found that treating dental caries with 5% NaF varnish is insufficient, urging the need to find another solution that is effective in halting caries progression.

In recent years, there has been great interest in the use of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) as a new method for caries prevention because of its superior effects. The utilisation of SDF eliminates the necessity for tooth drilling, and it possesses anticariogenic properties that are essential for curbing active and cavitated carious lesions by rebuilding enamel and dentin. Existing data indicate that employing a non-invasive method of applying SDF with a 38% concentration twice a year can effectively manage ECC by up to 76.3% after a 30-month follow-up period. The application of 38% SDF has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the occurrence of new caries in treated children by approximately 77% compared with non-treated children.

Although various mechanisms underlying the antibacterial effects of SDF have been elucidated, data on its effects on salivary pH and cariogenic bacteria, particularly S. mutans and Lactobacillus, are lacking. Although several in vivo studies have explored the effect of SDF on S. mutans and Lactobacillus, the scarcity of clinical investigations remains a challenge. This study provides a better understanding of the effects of SDF on the modulation of salivary pH and S. mutans and Lactobacillus and provides scientific evidence on the mechanism of action of SDF in the oral environment. Therefore, this study is crucial to support the use of SDF in clinical settings as an alternative to the conventional method of treatment in managing ECC. To date, there is no clinical data regarding the use of SDF in Malaysia or the investigation of cariogenic bacterial profiling following SDF treatment among the Malaysian population. therefore the general research objective is to compare the effects of 38% SDF and 5% NaF on salivary pH, S. mutans, and Lactobacillus counts in children with ECC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Selangor
      • Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia, 47000
        • University Technology MARA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children under 6 years old, with ECC, having at least one active dentinal caries were included in this study. The cavitated tooth was assessed using International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Children that only had the tooth that fulfilled the ICDAS score 5 were included. This is characterized by a distinct cavity with visible dentine, not including more than half of the tooth. The tooth must not be mobile, associated with abscess, or have the symptoms of irreversible pulpitis. Children that had been included in this study must have not been on antibiotic treatment for at least 3 months before the start of the study and not being put on such treatment throughout the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with any severe medical conditions, emotional or physical disorders were excluded from the study. Children that had been using chlorhexidine mouthwashes within 2 weeks before the baseline appointment or professional topical fluoride was applied in the past 6 months were also excluded. Another exclusion criteria are children that had gingival or perioral ulceration or stomatitis, or a tooth abscess, have a history of chemical allergies to silver, fluoride, potassium, iodine, and ammonia, and uncooperative child. Besides that, parents and children that were refused any type of treatment were excluded. Children who did not complete the follow up were considered dropouts.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Silver Diamine Fluoride
38% Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) is a topical antimicrobial and remineralizing agent which was cleared by the FDA as a Class II medical device to treat tooth sensitivity. In certain circumstances, SDF may be used as a non-restorative treatment to arrest carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth
Other Names:
  • SDF
Experimental: Group B
Sodium Fluoride Varnish
Fluoride varnish to apply on tooth surface, so that the tooth becomes more resistant to caries attack. The active ingredient of fluoride varnish is 5% sodium fluoride, (22,600 ppm fluoride)
Other Names:
  • NaF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison of salivary pH
Time Frame: 3 months
to compare the salivary pH before and after 3 months of 38% SDF and 5% NaF treatment
3 months
comparison of salivary counts of Streptococcus mutans
Time Frame: 3 months
to compare the salivary counts of Streptococcus mutans before and after 3 months of 38% SDF and 5% NaF treatment
3 months
comparison of salivary counts of Lactobacillus
Time Frame: 3 months
to compare the salivary counts of Lactobacillus before and after 3 months of 38% SDF and 5% NaF treatment
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection and comparison of salivary counts of Lactobacillus acidophilus
Time Frame: 3 months
to compare the relative numbers of Lactobacillus acidophilus before and after 3 months of 38% SDF and 5% NaF treatment with qPCR
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: NUR ASMAD, BDS, MScD, University Technology MARA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Early Childhood Caries

Clinical Trials on Silver diamine fluoride

3
Subscribe