Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation: (RADAR-Canada)

March 16, 2024 updated by: John Marshall, Unity Health Toronto

Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation: The RADAR-Canada Pilot Clinical Trial

The RADAR-Canada trial is a pilot RCT undertaken to assess the acceptability of, compliance with, and biologic consequences of a deresuscitation protocol designed to expedite the removal of excess interstitial fluid in patients who remain in a positive fluid balance following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Over the course of an acute illness, critically ill patients typically receive substantial volumes of intravenous fluids, administered for resuscitation, maintenance, and as diluents for medications. A positive fluid balance is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Whether active reversal of a positive fluid balance through fluid restriction and diuresis will improve outcomes is uncertain.

Methods: The Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation (RADAR) trial is a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a larger trial powered for clinically important outcomes, the acceptability of a deresuscitation protocol, and the impact of a trial on stability of practice patterns. RADAR is an open label pilot trial that will recruit 120 patients from 10 to 12 active sites in Canada. Eligible patients will be 18 years or older, mechanically ventilated >48 hours but in the ICU for less than five days, and in a calculated positive fluid balance of > three liters. Patients will be randomized to either usual care or a deresuscitation protocol incorporating a fluid minimization strategy and diuresis.

Results and Discussion: Evidence that recruited patients will be managed according to the trial protocol, with a withdrawal rate of less than 5%, a compliance rate of >75% and a crossover rate of <10% will establish the acceptability of the protocol. A mean difference in fluid balance between groups of more than three liters 72 hours after enrolment will establish the feasibility of the protocol. Analyses of clinical effects will be secondary analyses. Survival to day 90 following randomization will be measured, and other clinical measures will provide estimates of rates of key outcomes to inform the design of a definitive, adequately powered trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older
  2. Mechanically ventilated for > 48 hours
  3. Calculated volume accumulation > 3 liters since ICU admission or pitting edema in at least two sites (arms, legs, or trunk)
  4. Admitted to ICU for ≤ five days
  5. Informed consent obtained from patient or alternate decision-maker

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Lack of consent from patient or substitute decision maker or from responsible physician 2. Active bleeding (defined as > 2 units transfused RBC in past 24 hours) 3. Hemodynamic instability (defined as use of vasopressors >0.1 µg/kg/minute norepinephrine or equivalent, or increase in vasopressor dose over past 6 hours) 4. Currently receiving dialysis, or plans to initiate dialysis imminently 5. P/F ratio < 75 6. Subarachnoid hemorrhage 7. Severe traumatic brain injury with admission GCS <8 8. Diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar state 9. Acute cardiac failure or cardiogenic shock 10. Suspected or established diabetes insipidus 11. Allergy to furosemide 12. High probability of death within 24 hours

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active deresuscitation
  • Fluid minimization: clinical and research teams will review all intravenous orders and attempt to reduce fluids to 10-15 ml/hr.
  • Active deresuscitation:
  • Administer bolus furosemide 0.5 mg/kg bid or tid
  • Target daily negative fluid balance as follows:

Calculated positive balance:

< 3 liters -600 - -800 ml/24 hours 3-6 liters 0.8 - 1.2 liters/24 hours 6- 10 liters 1.2 - 2.0 liters/24 hours >10 liters >2.0 liters/24 hours

  • If bolus furosemide fails to achieve these goals, results in hypotension or tachycardia, or at the discretion of the attending intensivist, start furosemide infusion titrated on an hourly basis to achieve above goals
  • If single agent ineffective, consider addition of metolazone
o.5 mg/kg bid or tid IV
Diuretic as needed
No Intervention: Usual care
Care at the discretion of the attending team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy: Mean cumulative fluid balance
Time Frame: 72 hours following randomization
Total fluid input (mL) - output (mL) in each group
72 hours following randomization
Compliance with deresuscitation protocol
Time Frame: Each 24 hours over first week
Daily fluid balance in mL >10 liters, target >2.0 liters/24 hours
Each 24 hours over first week
Acceptability of protocol
Time Frame: Day 1
Percentage of eligible patients who consent to randomization
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 90 days following randomization
Deaths
90 days following randomization
New onset organ dysfunction
Time Frame: 7 days following randomization
Change in aggregate Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) score from baseline, where the range is 0 - 25, and higher values indicate more severe organ dysfunction
7 days following randomization
Organ support-free days
Time Frame: 28 days following randomization
Days alive and free from respiratory or hemodynamic support
28 days following randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inflammatory and renal biomarkers - change from baseline values
Time Frame: 3 days following randomization
including, but not limited to IL-6, sTNFr1, ICAM, HCO3-, protein C, CRP) or markers of AKI (including, but not limited to N-GAL, KIM-1, TIMP2-IGFBP-7, cystatin C
3 days following randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John C Marshall, MD, Unity Health Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Furosemide Injection

3
Subscribe