Comparative Efficacy of Carbetocin and Oxytocin in Parturients at Risk of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery

Comparative Efficacy of Carbetocin and Oxytocin in Parturients at Risk of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this study is to compare 2 medications that are commonly used to prevent excess uterine bleeding (postpartum hemorrhage, or PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD), oxytocin and carbetocin. Most of the trials evaluating the preventative role of oxytocin and carbetocin after CD have focused on patient with low-risk of PPH.

This trial will focus on patients that are at increased risk of PPH, with risk factors such as: multiple gestation (twins, or more multiples), large baby, polyhydramnios (excess amniotic fluid), history of PPH, body mass index greater than 40, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and placenta previa.

The investigators hypothesize that carbetocin would be more effective than an oxytocin regimen in reducing the risk of PPH in patients undergoing CD with any of the biological high-risk factors.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a potentially life-threatening complication and one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. It has been estimated that one in every five maternal deaths occurs due to PPH globally. Primary PPH is predominantly caused by uterine atony or inadequate contraction of the uterus after childbirth. Active management of the third stage of labor involves prophylactic administration of a uterotonic agent before delivery of the placenta, as well as delayed cord clamping and controlled traction of the umbilical cord. The uterotonic administration remains the most essential component in terms of preventing PPH.

Oxytocin, a synthetic pituitary hormone, is the most commonly used first-line uterotonic drug. However, because of the short half-life (3-17 min), a continuous intravenous infusion is necessary to maintain uterotonic activity. Carbetocin is a synthetic oxytocin analog that binds with a similar affinity to the oxytocin receptors in the myometrium. Carbetocin produces stronger and more sustained action compared to oxytocin and has a longer half-life than oxytocin, thus reducing the requirement for an infusion after the initial dose. Recently published guidelines from the Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SOGC) have stated that Carbetocin should be considered as a first-line agent for the prevention of PPH after cesarean delivery (CD). The international consensus statement on the use of uterotonic agents has also recommended carbetocin as an alternative to oxytocin infusion during CD due to its longer duration of action.

Trials comparing carbetocin with oxytocin in CD have shown mixed results on superiority of carbetocin over oxytocin for the need for additional uterotonics and amount of blood loss, however, no significant effect on blood loss >1000 ml could be found. Most of the trials evaluating the prophylactic role of oxytocin and carbetocin after CD have focused on the low-risk PPH population. The incidence of biological risk factors for uterine atony such as multiple gestation (due to assisted reproductive techniques), and obesity has progressively increased in developed countries. There is still a lack of high-quality trials on the efficacy of carbetocin in high-risk parturients undergoing CD.

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the efficacy of carbetocin 100 mcg with oxytocin 5 IU bolus followed by continuous infusion of 250 mIU/min over 4 hours at elective CD in parturients with risk factors for uterine atony.

The comparative data is still lacking for both the agents as first-line uterotonics for patients having a high risk for uterine atony undergoing cesarean delivery. The result of this trial regarding the relative uterotonic efficacy and safety of the standardized prophylactic doses of both agents (carbetocin and oxytocin) will form the evidence base for future guidelines in high-risk parturients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ronald George, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kristi Downey, MSc
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Narinder Singh, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria - Any one or more of the risk factors for uterine atony:

  • Overdistended uterus due to:
  • Polyhydramnios (amniotic fluid index >24 cm)
  • Fetal macrosomia reported on prenatal ultrasound >90th centile or > 4000 gm
  • Multiple gestation
  • History of uterine atony/PPH (documented with blood loss of >1000 ml, blood transfusion, use surgical methods such as Bakri balloon, B-Lynch sutures, uterine artery ligation or embolization)
  • Obesity with body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Hypertensive disease (chronic hypertension or severe preeclampsia on treatment)
  • Placenta previa

Exclusion criteria:

  • Valvular heart disease, arrhythmias, or heart failure
  • Placenta accreta spectrum
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Anemia (<100 g/dl)
  • Allergy or sensitivity to oxytocin or carbetocin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Oxytocin 5IU
IV oxytocin 5 IU diluted in 10 mL normal saline over 1 min followed by continuous infusion of 250 mIU/min over 4 hours.
Patient is given oxytocin 5 IU diluted in 10 mL normal saline, administered intravenously over 1 min, followed by continuous infusion of 250 mIU/min over 4 hours.
Other Names:
  • Pitocin
Active Comparator: Carbetocin 100mcg
IV carbetocin 100 mcg diluted in 10 mL normal saline over 1 min followed by placebo infusion for 4 hours after the delivery of the fetus.
Patient is given carbetocin 100 mcg diluted in 10 mL normal saline, administered intravenously over 1 min, followed by placebo infusion for 4 hours.
Other Names:
  • Duratocin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of parturients requiring additional uterotonic agents intraoperatively
Time Frame: 90 minutes
The proportion of patients who are administered additional uterotonic agents intraoperatively will be divided by the total number of patients assigned to the same treatment arm, for each of the 2 groups: oxytocin and carbetocin.
90 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uterine Tone 3 minutes
Time Frame: 3 minutes
The intensity of uterine tone as evaluated by palpation of the uterus by the obstetrician at 3 minutes, from the completion of delivery of the drug, utilizing a verbal numeric rating scale of 0-10.
3 minutes
Uterine Tone 5 minutes
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The intensity of uterine tone as evaluated by palpation of the uterus by the obstetrician at 5 minutes, from the completion of delivery of the drug, utilizing a verbal numeric rating scale of 0-10.
5 minutes
Uterine Tone 10 minutes
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The intensity of uterine tone as evaluated by palpation of the uterus by the obstetrician at 10 minutes, from the completion of delivery of the drug, utilizing a verbal numeric rating scale of 0-10.
10 minutes
Calculated blood loss (CBL)
Time Frame: 24 hours
Blood loss will be calculated through the difference in hematocrit values assessed prior to and at the end of 24 hours after the cesarean section.
24 hours
Semi-quantitative blood loss (SQBL)
Time Frame: 2 hours
Blood loss measured in the operating room by volume (ml)
2 hours
Presence of blood transfusion
Time Frame: 24 hours
Number of units of blood product administered post-delivery
24 hours
Number of patients with ICU admission
Time Frame: 24 hours
Admission to the intensive care unit for bleeding post partum
24 hours
Number of patients with conservative surgical methods to manage post partum hemorrhage
Time Frame: 2 hours
Bakri balloon/B-Lynch sutures used intraoperatively
2 hours
Number of patients with radiological methods used to manage post partum hemorrhage
Time Frame: 2 hours
Uterine artery embolization used intraoperatively.
2 hours
Number of patients with surgical post partum hemorrhage management measures
Time Frame: 2 hours
Re-exploration for bleeding/uterine artery ligation/hysterectomy
2 hours
Number of patients with hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 80% of baseline
Time Frame: 2 hours
Systolic blood pressure < 80% of baseline, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Number of patients with hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure greater than 120% of baseline
Time Frame: 2 hours
Systolic blood pressure > 120% of baseline, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Number of patients with tachycardia defined as heart rate greater than 130% of baseline
Time Frame: 2 hours
Heart rate > 130% of baseline, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Number of patients with bradycardia defined as heart rate less than 70% of baseline
Time Frame: 2 hours
Heart rate < 70% of baseline, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Presence of ventricular tachycardia: ECG
Time Frame: 2 hours
Presence of ventricular tachycardia as recorded by ECG, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Presence of atrial fibrillation: ECG
Time Frame: 2 hours
Presence of atrial fibrillation as recorded by ECG, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Presence of atrial flutter: ECG
Time Frame: 2 hours
Presence of atrial flutter as recorded by ECG, at any time during surgery
2 hours
Presence of nausea: questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 hours
The presence of nausea at any time during surgery, as reported by the patient
2 hours
Presence of vomiting: questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 hours
The presence of vomiting at any time during surgery, as reported by the patient
2 hours
Number of patients with chest pain: questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 hours
Any presence of chest pain, at any time during surgery, as reported by the patient
2 hours
Number of patients with shortness of breath: questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 hours
Any presence of shortness of breath, at any time during surgery, as reported by the patient.
2 hours
Number of patients with headache: questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 hours
Any presence of headache, at any time during surgery, as reported by the patient.
2 hours
Number of patients with flushing: questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 hours
Any presence of flushing, at any time during surgery.
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mrinalini Balki, MD, Mount Sinai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Partum Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Oxytocin

3
Subscribe