Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine Used for Buccal Infiltration and Supplemental Palatinal Infiltration Anesthesia in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis

March 29, 2024 updated by: Damla Kırıcı, Akdeniz University

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of articaine or lidocaine in buccal infiltration or palatal infiltration in addition to buccal infiltration in maxillary first or second molars with irreversible pulpitis.

Method: Among the patients who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry Endodontic Clinic for the treatment of maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis, 80 volunteers who met the criteria were included in the study. Eighty patients were divided into 4 groups (n = 20). 1. group buccal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine, 2. group buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80,000 epinephrine, 3. group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4.group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80.000 epinephrine. Pain during the endodontic procedure was determined and recorded according to the Heft Parker visual analog scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antalya, Turkey, 07070
        • Akdeniz University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient must be a healthy individual between the ages of 18 and 65 who is classified as ASA I and II.
  2. No allergy to local anesthetic substances to be used in the study
  3. Upper maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis whose vitality has been proven by pulp tests, with no radiolucency at the root tip
  4. Not having used any painkillers, antibiotics, antidepressants and sedative drugs in the last 12 hours
  5. Being capable of understanding the Pain scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to local anesthetics
  2. Failure to respond to the cold test and electric pulp test performed on the relevant tooth
  3. Radiolucent lesion in the apical part of the relevant tooth on periapical radiography
  4. No vital tissue is encountered when the pulp chamber is opened

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: buccal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine
application of different anesthesia techniques
Experimental: buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80,000 epinephrine
application of different anesthesia techniques
Experimental: buccal and palatinal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine
application of different anesthesia techniques
Experimental: buccal and palatinal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80.000 epinephrine
application of different anesthesia techniques

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of complementary palatinal anesthesia with VAS
Time Frame: 10 minutes after anesthesia is performed
10 minutes after anesthesia is performed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fist and Second Molars With ırreversible Pulpitis

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

3
Subscribe