Evaluation of Performance-based Functional Outcome Measures After Open Abdominal Surgery

April 2, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Evaluation of Performance-based Functional Outcome Measures After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Comparison of Clinimetric Properties of Four Tools

A laparotomy is a surgical technique, the increasing rate of this surgical interventions and the subsequent need to evaluate the post-surgical recovery and rehabilitation process comprehensively. This study aims to provide essential insights into the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of such tests, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about patient recovery progress and the optimization of rehabilitation protocols.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The significance of this research lies in its potential to enhance the quality of care and patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and contribute to evidence-based decision-making in postsurgical rehabilitation, ultimately improving the overall well-being of surgical patients. This study is to evaluate the clinimetric properties of four distinct tools designed for assessing performance-based functional outcomes following open abdominal surgery. 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 5 Times Sit to Stand test (5T STS), 2 minute Walk test (2MWT), and Timed Up and GO (TUG)will be assessed to determine any changes in their functionality and overall well-being on day 2 and on day of discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 00666
        • Fauji Foundation Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Suman Sheraz, PhD*
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sana Nasir, MS-CPPT*

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Post-laparotomy patients
  • Hemodynamically stable
  • Age between 30 to 60 years
  • Ambulatory patients
  • Patients score 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incidence of adverse events through hemodynamic and medication data.
  • Diagnosed cognitive dysfunction.
  • Diagnosed neurologic or musculoskeletal disease (excluding osteoarthritis) adversely affecting gait or weight-bearing.
  • History of Orthostatic intolerance.
  • History of recent fractures, blunt trauma emergency laparotomy, carcinoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Functionality Assessment
Each participant will be provided with an informed consent form detailing the purpose of the study. After obtaining written consent, baseline data will be collected, including demographic information, medical history, and any pre-existing conditions. The participants will then undergo the post-laparotomy interventions as described. Throughout the intervention period, data will be collected using the tools mentioned: 6 minute Walk Test, 5 Times Sit to Stand test, 2 Minute walk Test, and Timed Up and GO to determine any changes in their functionality and overall well-being on post operative day 1 and before discharge. For reliability, tests will be conducted twice a day with a minimum gap of 2 hours, both on day 1 and on the day of discharge.

Single session of coached deep breathing and coughing exercises. 10 supervised slow flow deep breaths to total lung capacity with a 3-5 second end inspiratory hold completed with 2 end inspiratory sniffs. 2-3 supported coughs or huffs. Repeated for another set. Patients instructed to perform independently hourly. Assisted ambulation according to the following protocol:

  • Stage 1 of 2 minutes.
  • Stage 2 of 0-1 minute.
  • Stage 3 of 1 - 3 minutes.
  • Stage 4 of 3 - 6 minutes.
  • Stage 5 of 6 - 10 minutes.
  • Stage 6 of 10 - 15 minutes.
  • Stage 7 > 15 minutes. Total session time is the accumulative work time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6MWT (Six-Minute Walk Test)
Time Frame: 1 week

A submaximal exercise test called the 6MWT is used to measure aerobic capacity and endurance. This test's main goal is for the patient to walk as far as they can in six minutes.

6MWT (Six-Minute Walk Test) A submaximal exercise test called the 6MWT is used to measure aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance (measured in meters) traveled during the six minutes allotted for the test determines the score.

1 week
5 Times Sit to Stand
Time Frame: 1 week
The test can be used to track the course of an illness or the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention in addition to providing useful information about a person's functional ability. The distance (measured in meters) traveled during the six minutes allotted for the test determines the score. Greater aerobic endurance and functional capacity are indicated by a longer distance
1 week
2MWT (Two-Minute Walk Test)
Time Frame: 1 week
The 2MWT is a functional exercise test designed to evaluate an individual's aerobic capacity and endurance over a shorter duration compared to the 6MWT.
1 week
Timed Up and GO (TUG)
Time Frame: 1 week
. It is designed to assess an individual's mobility and requires the participant to stand up from a seated position, walk a distance of three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suman Sheraz, PhD*, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sana Nasir Zaidi

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparotomy

Clinical Trials on Standardised Physiotherapy Plan

3
Subscribe