Evaluating User Satisfaction and Feasibility of a Remote Model for 3d Scanned and Printed Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets

April 8, 2024 updated by: Tabitha Quake, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Evaluating User Satisfaction and Feasibility of a Remote-digital Model for 3d Scanning and Printing of Prosthetic Sockets for Patients With Transtibial Amputation: A Preliminary Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the repeatability of application of a fully remote method of manufacturing 3D printing of prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees, and determine user satisfaction of sockets produced through these methods. The study also aims to evaluate the time and cost effectiveness of this production model.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  1. To determine the repeatability and user satisfaction with transtibial sockets produced using a remote-digital method as compared to conventional manufacturing methods.
  2. To determine if transtibial prosthetic users have greater prosthetic satisfaction scores across the 4 Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) subscales of Utility (UT), Appearance (AP), Sounds (SO) and Residual Limb Health (RL) with the 3D printed socket fabricated through the remote-digital method compared to the laminate socket made using the conventional method.
  3. To determine if transtibial prosthetic users experience greater socket comfort with the 3D printed socket compared to the laminate socket.

Participants will receive a 3D printed socket (trial intervention) and a laminate socket (control intervention) and will use each socket for a period of 4 weeks.The order of socket use will be randomised. At the end of each 4 week period, participants will rate their comfort and satisfaction with the socket. At the end of the trial, participants will indicate their preferred socket, which will be fitted to their prosthesis.

Participants will attend 6 visits across a total duration of 11 weeks during the course of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The visit schedule for the study is as follows:

  • Visit 1 (Week 0): Attain consent and initiate casting and scanning process for 1 laminate and 1 3D printed transtibial socket
  • Visit 2 (Week 3): Fitting and adjustment of first prosthetic socket (either 3D printed or laminate socket). Subjects to rate comfort of first socket.
  • Visit 3 (Week 5): Follow-up on any required device adjustments/ troubleshooting to first socket.
  • Visit 4 (Week 7): Evaluation of user satisfaction with first socket. Subjects to fill up survey on first socket. Fitting of other socket design (second socket). Subjects to rate comfort of second socket.
  • Visit 5 (Week 9): Follow-up on any required device adjustments/ troubleshooting to second socket.
  • Visit 6 (Week 11): Evaluation of user satisfaction with second socket. Subjects to fill up survey on second socket and select their preferred socket. Fitting of patient's preferred socket to prosthesis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 308433
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral transtibial amputation, current transtibial prosthetic users minimally capable of community ambulation (mobility grades K2 - K4) who have completed gait training, current users of a roll on elastomeric or silicone liner system, and aged 21 years old and above to be able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Functional status: patients with severe aphasia or neglect (inability to obey 1 step commands), communication disorders precluding understanding of instructions, cognitive impairment, dementia, untreated depression or psychiatric disorder.
  2. Mobility status: patients who are non-community ambulators (mobility grade K1) or who have not completed gait training
  3. Active limb conditions: uncontrolled lower limb volume fluctuations, severe stump varus or valgus deformities and/or lower limb contractures of over 10 degrees, or with local limb conditions which could be exacerbated by research interventions such as open wounds, ulcers, stump pain or stump wounds/ulcers, neuromas, active arthritis or joint or limb pain.
  4. Reproductive age females should not be pregnant during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laminate socket
control intervention as standard treatment for transtibial amputees requiring a lower limb prosthesis
3d printed prosthetic socket produced through multi-jet fusion (MJF)
Experimental: 3d printed socket
trial intervention for transtibial amputees requiring a lower limb prosthesis
3d printed prosthetic socket produced through multi-jet fusion (MJF)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of socket use
Subscales of Utility, Appearance, Sounds and Residual Limb Health, and an individual satisfaction question
after 4 weeks of socket use
Socket Comfort Score
Time Frame: at initial socket fitting and 4 weeks post-fitting
Self-reported socket comfort is rated from 0 - 10, where 0 is the most uncomfortable socket imaginable and 10 the most comfortable.
at initial socket fitting and 4 weeks post-fitting

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tabitha Quake, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021/00638

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on 3d printed prosthetic socket

3
Subscribe