Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Predictive Models

Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Multiomic Predictive Models of Treatment Response (DermAtOmics-II)

This is a low-intervention phase IV trial. The main objective is to optimize the treatment of patients with moderate-severe atopic dermatitis that require systemic treatment after failure, intolerance or contraindication to cyclosporine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary outcome is the percentage of patients with primary non-response to second-line treatment. Defined as fail to achieve EASI-75 (a 75% improvement in EASI score) at week 16 of follow-up. A 12-month recruitment period is planned and about 150 patients with moderate-severe atopic dermatitis will be recruited. The study is divided into two cohorts. All patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are going to receive second-line systemic treatment at the Dermatology Department of La Paz University Hospital are selected in cohort 1. Patients will receive the starting dose used in routine clinical practice. All patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are receiving second-line systemic treatment at the Dermatology Department of La Paz University Hospital will be selected in cohort 2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital La Paz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Cohort 1:

  1. Subjects diagnosed with moderate-severe atopic dermatitis who are going to receive an authorized second-line systemic treatment.
  2. Participants must be willing and able to provide written informed consent prior the initiation of any study procedures.
  3. For children, parent/legal guardian must provide written informed consent. If age >11 years old, the minor must give assent.
  4. Participant is willing and able to adhere to the procedures specified in this protocol.

Cohort 2:

  1. Subjects diagnosed with moderate-severe atopic dermatitis who are already receiving authorized second-line systemic therapy at the time of selection.
  2. Participants must be willing and able to provide written informed consent prior the initiation of any study procedures.
  3. For children, parent/legal guardian must provide written informed consent. If age >11 years old, the minor must give assent.
  4. Participant is willing and able to adhere to the procedures specified in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any investigational drug within 60 days prior to study drug administration.
  2. Any condition or situation precluding or interfering the compliance with the protocol.
  3. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and Day 0.
  4. Women of childbearing potential must commit not to become pregnant. They must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods or have practiced sexual abstinence during the study. Highly effective contraceptive methods include oral, intravaginal, or transdermal combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation; oral, injectable, or implantable progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation; intrauterine device; intrauterine hormone-releasing system; bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomised partner and sexual abstinence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Cohort 1: patients who are about to initiate treatment

Patients will receive the dose used in routine clinical practice.

Once the patient is included in the clinical trial their therapeutic management will be conducted according to standard clinical practice, but some additional procedures will be performed:

  1. The frequency of follow-up visits will be increased in order to collect data related to clinical efficacy, safety and quality of life.
  2. Blood samples will be obtained for biochemical, pharmacogenetic and immunological biomarker analysis
Patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical medication, who also have previous experience with cyclosporine and an unsatisfactory response, or in whom the use of cyclosporine is considered inappropriate due to contraindication or intolerance, are candidates for treatment with other alternatives (Dupilumab, Tralokinumab, Upadacitinib, Baricitinib, Abrocitinib).
Other Names:
  • Dupilumab, Tralokinumab, Upadacitinib, Baricitinib, Abrocitinib
Other: Cohort 2: patients who are already receiving second-line systemic treatment
If the patient is receiving second-line therapy at the moment of the inclusion, data will be collected from clinical records from treatment start until study inclusion and prospectively after study inclusion.
If the patient is receiving second-line therapy at the moment of the inclusion, data will be collected from clinical records from treatment start until study inclusion and prospectively after study inclusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with primary non-response to second-line treatment.
Time Frame: Week 16
Fail to achieve EASI-75 (a 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score). The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72.
Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients achieving EASI-75
Time Frame: Week 6
Fail to achieve EASI-75 (a 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score). The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72.
Week 6
Time to treatment failure after week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
Time to treatment failure with cyclosporine defined as Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤ 50 during follow-up after week 16.
Week 16
Mean percentage of change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score
Time Frame: Week 16
Mean percentage of change in EASI score from baseline to week 16.
Week 16
Percentage of change in SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis)
Time Frame: Week 16
Is the score of the severity of atopic dermatitis. It includes the evaluation of the affected areas. The intensity of the lesions and the subjective symptoms of the patient. Classifies AD as Mild >25, Moderate 25-50, and Severe >50
Week 16
Improvement of at least 75% in SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Percentage of patients experiencing an improvement of at least 75% in SCORAD from the baseline value.

The SCORAD for that individual is A/5 + 7B/2 + C. The total area is 'A', which has a possible maximum of 100%. The intensity scores are added together to give 'B' (maximum 18). The subjective symptoms is 'C' (maximum 20).

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change of IGA (Investigator Global Assessment)
Time Frame: Week 16
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) is a simple objective measure providing an overall evaluation. It uses a 5-point scale (clear=0; almost clear=1; mild=2; moderate=3; severe=4).
Week 16
Time to IGA score of 0/1 (Investigator Global Assessment)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time to IGA score of 0/1 (clear or almost clear).
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change of BSA (Body surface area)
Time Frame: Week 16
Change of BSA (Body surface area) involment
Week 16
Change in NRS
Time Frame: Week 16
Change in NRS (numerical rating scale). The NRS is comprised of one item and represents the numbers 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch").
Week 16
Change in RECAP
Time Frame: Week 16
RECAP (Recap of atopic eczema) is used to assess the control of different degrees of eczema severity through 7 items.
Week 16
Percentage of patients having a variation of 4 points in their improvement in DLQI
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Dermatology Life Quality Index is a validated and widely used 10-item questionnaire with paediatric versions (0-3 and 4-16 years). A variation of 4 points is considered a clinically meaningful endpoint.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in POEM (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure)
Time Frame: Week 16
The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM): is a validated tool in which the patient self-assesses how many days they experienced seven distinct items (itch, sleep disturbance, bleeding, weeping/oozing, cracking, flaking, dryness of the skin) during a period of 1 week. The maximum score is 28 points.
Week 16
Rate of adverse events associated to second-line systemic treatment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical trial participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the research procedures or the investigational medicinal product.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Percentage of patients reaching EASI-90 (Percentage of patients reaching 90 percentage)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Percentage of patients reaching 90 percentage (EASI-90) improvement from baseline during follow-up. The minimum EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Irene García, MD, Hospital La Paz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on Second-line systemic treatment

3
Subscribe