The Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination in Comparison With the Other Antiemetics

April 24, 2024 updated by: Hashim Talib Hashim, University of Baghdad

Enhancing Antiemetic Efficacy: A Randomized Trial of Vitamin B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Therapy Versus Traditional Regimens

This study investigates the effectiveness of combining vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to standard antiemetic treatments for managing nausea and vomiting. Through a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients with diverse causes of nausea and vomiting, we aim to evaluate the frequency, severity, and tolerability of the B6 and metoclopramide combination. By elucidating its comparative efficacy against established antiemetics, this research seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in selecting optimal treatment regimens tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately enhancing the management of nausea and vomiting across various medical conditions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Title: Investigating the Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Versus Alternative Antiemetics: A Clinical Trial Proposal

Introduction:

Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms across various medical conditions and can significantly impact patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. While several antiemetic medications exist, finding the most effective regimen remains a clinical challenge. This proposal aims to investigate the efficacy of a combination therapy comprising vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to other antiemetics in managing nausea and vomiting.

Rationale:

Both vitamin B6 and metoclopramide have shown antiemetic properties through different mechanisms of action. However, the comparative efficacy of this combination therapy against other standard antiemetics remains largely unexplored. Understanding the relative effectiveness of this combination could provide valuable insights into optimizing antiemetic strategies, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other related conditions.

Objectives:

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy compared to alternative antiemetic regimens in reducing the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting episodes in adult patients. Additionally, the study seeks to assess the safety profile and tolerability of the combination therapy.

Conclusion:

By elucidating the comparative efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy, this study endeavors to contribute to evidence-based decision-making in the management of nausea and vomiting. The findings could potentially guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate antiemetic regimen tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thi Qar
      • Nasiriyah, Thi Qar, Iraq, 64001
        • Al-Nassiryah Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patients with vomiting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients vitally unstable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Metoclopramide Group
This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Metoclopramide only for vomiting.
We gave only Metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
Other Names:
  • Plasil
Active Comparator: Zofran Group
This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Zofran only for vomiting.
We gave only Zofran as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
Other Names:
  • Zofran
Experimental: B6 and Metoclopramide Group
This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given B6 and Metoclopramide combination for vomiting.
We gave a combination of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
Other Names:
  • Vitamin B6 and Metoclopramide combination
No Intervention: Control Group
This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given nothing for vomiting.
Active Comparator: Vitamin B6 Group
This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Vitamin B6 only for vomiting.
We gave only vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.
Other Names:
  • Pyridoxine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nausea
Time Frame: 1 day
Four characteristics of nausea typically were measured including duration, frequency, severity, and associated distress. Duration was measured by asking the patient if they had experienced nausea and/or the number of hours that nausea was experienced during the time frame addressed.
1 day
Vomiting
Time Frame: 1 day
Four characteristics of vomiting typically were measured including duration, frequency, severity, and associated distress. Duration was measured by asking the patient if they had experienced vomiting and/or the number of hours that vomiing was experienced during the time frame addressed.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hashim Talib T Hashim, MBChB, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We are not sharing any individual data with anyone.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vomiting

Clinical Trials on Metoclopramide

3
Subscribe