Identification of Limiting Factors in the Locomotor Activity of Individuals With Lower Limb Amputation: (AMPUTEEFACT)

Identification of Limiting Factors in the Locomotor Activity of Individuals With Lower Limb Amputation: Biomechanical, Physiological, Psychological.

The experience of amputation leads to a deterioration in quality of life, with undeniable somatic and functional repercussions. The result is a reduction in general mobility, increased metabolic energy requirements and a feeling of discomfort and pain. The rehabilitation objectives focus on improving, or at least maintaining, the range of movement of the lower limbs, strengthening the overall muscles, ensuring that the equipment is correctly adapted, re-training for physical exertion and working on balance and walking. The rehabilitation objectives focus on social inclusion with the equipment, to optimise the return home and promote social and professional reintegration, and therapeutic education. Factors influencing the postoperative resumption of walking in amputees have been identified as key elements in the success of rehabilitation management. These include maintaining joint range of motion before fitting any equipment, combating postoperative loss of muscle mass, managing cardiorespiratory deconditioning and, finally, resuming walking with the aid of equipment, taking account of fluctuating balance.

The literature shows that a change in the centre of gravity and postural instability, particularly when changing stance, are responsible for a greater risk of falls in lower-limb amputees. This asymmetry of gait, which is the cause of a greater risk of secondary joint degeneration, is found in both transtibial and transfemoral amputees. This alteration in balance has a direct influence on walking ability, and therefore calls for significant proprioceptive management in the rehabilitation programme. Gait analysis in lower-limb amputees therefore seems essential, both for the purposes of evaluating and monitoring rehabilitation treatment, and for prosthetic selection and adjustment. Three-dimensional assessment of walking in amputees, coupled with force platforms, is the test of choice for providing kinematic, kinetic and spatiotemporal data (motion capture).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with lower limb amputations, unilateral or bilateral, walking with or without technical aids, whatever the level (trans-femoral or trans-tibial) and hospitalised in the locomotor rehabilitation department. Patients who were not autonomous enough to walk and required a third person (human aid) were not included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Amputees in PRM hospitalisation at the CHU Nîmes RRL service University Rehabilitation Hospital in Le Grau du Roi.
  • All aetiologies: vascular, traumatic and septic.
  • Appropriate vascular equipment validated by PRM doctor.
  • Able to walk for 5 minutes on a treadmill.
  • Patient affiliated to or benefiting from a health insurance scheme.
  • Adult patient (>18 years) and under 80 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncorrected or untreated visual disorders.
  • Patients with major cognitive impairment (MOCA>23).
  • Patients with vestibular disorders.
  • Patient with uncontrolled epilepsy.
  • Patient with an unhealed amputation stump.
  • Weight > 135kg or < 20kg
  • Patients with a FAC of 1 (i.e. patients requiring the firm and continuous assistance of another person to carry their weight and maintain their balance) or less.
  • Inability to properly adjust the sling to the corresponding body part due to:
  • Body shape
  • Colostomy bags
  • Skin lesions that cannot be adequately protected.
  • Any other reason that prevents the harness from being adjusted correctly and painlessly.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lower Limb Amputation
Patients with lower limb amputations, unilateral or bilateral, walking with or without technical aids, at any level (trans-femoral or trans-tibial) and hospitalised in the locomotor rehabilitation department of the Nîmes University Hospital.
None, pure observationnal study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VO2 consumption as a function of amputation level
Time Frame: Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
To quantify the cost (consumption of Vo2 in mL/kg/min) of a task as a function of the level of amputation. VO2 consumption is measured using a VO2 master calorimetric mask, which analyses gas exchange for 3 minutes. To quantify the cost of the task, VO2 consumption over the 3rd minute is used, normalised in relation to VO2 consumption at rest.
Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
VO2 consumption as a function of gait asymmetry
Time Frame: Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
Quantify the cost (Vo2 consumption in mL/kg/min) of a task as a function of gait asymmetry compared with VO2 consumption at rest.
Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
Consumption of VO2 as a function of prosthetic equipment
Time Frame: Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
To quantify the cost (consumption of Vo2 in mL/kg/min) of a task as a function of the prosthetic equipment compared with the consumption of VO2 at rest.
Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
Consumption of VO2 as a function of walking condition.
Time Frame: Before and during performance of a standardised motor task
To quantify the cost (consumption of Vo2 in mL/kg/min) of a task as a function of the walking condition compared with the consumption of VO2 at rest.
Before and during performance of a standardised motor task

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anissa MEGZARI, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LOCAL/2024/EP-01
  • IRB 24.03.08 (Other Identifier: IRB CHU de Nîmes)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Amputation

Clinical Trials on None, pure observationnal study

3
Subscribe