Ketamine-assisted Integrative Treatment for Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain and Comorbid Depression

May 20, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of ketamine infusions followed by a brief behavioral intervention in Veterans with chronic low back pain and depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) and depression are top causes of disability in the United States. Veterans are more likely to have both; prevalence is increasing. When CLBP and depression occur together, patients report more functional limitations, unemployment, and higher healthcare spending, and treatment is less successful. Novel approaches simultaneously addressing pain interference and depression symptoms are needed.

This study will involve initial pilot feasibility testing of an intervention designed to help participants with chronic low back pain and depression both reduce pain interference and improve mood. This study will occur in two phases. The initial phase is a open-label single-arm pilot of the combined intervention (ketamine infusions followed by the brief behavioral intervention) in a small sample of Veterans (n=5). The objective is to develop and assess initial feasibility of study procedures and obtain participant feedback through semi-structured exit interviews. The second phase consists of a single-blind, two-arm, pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=44, 22 per arm) which will (a) assess feasibility benchmarks and (b) collect outcome data that will be used to calculate sample size to power a larger RCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105-2303
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Victoria D Powell, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans with self-report of moderate to severe, high impact chronic low back pain (defined as 4/10 in severity via NRS, present 3 months on most days) and associated pain interference (defined as T-score 60 on the PROMIS Pain Interference measure), and current significant depressive symptoms (defined as a score 11 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self Report (QIDS-SR).
  • Medically stable (no hospitalizations in the past month lasting 3 days).
  • No changes in pain or depression medication regimen in 4 weeks.
  • No planned surgery, injections, hospitalizations, or other new interventions for back pain (except for physical therapy or exercise) or depression during the next four months (study duration).
  • Participants must have an adult who can drive them home after the ketamine treatments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to speak English due to the narrative intervention being conducted in English.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent (e.g. current delirium).
  • Current psychotic symptoms, or history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and other psychotic disorder.
  • Currently participating in another clinical trial for pain or depression.
  • Current uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg).
  • Known elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral arterial aneurysm, or elevated intraocular pressure.
  • History of cirrhosis or unstable cardiac condition (e.g., decompensated congestive heart failure).
  • Any of the following lab values >2x upper limit of normal: alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transferase (AST), direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine; thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) <2x lower limit of normal or >2x upper limit of normal.
  • Positive urine pregnancy test or lack of birth control method in Veterans of childbearing potential.
  • Known hypersensitivity to any excipient in the ketamine injection formulation.
  • Previously experienced serious adverse effects with ketamine.
  • On day of ketamine infusions, a urine drug screen positive for non-prescribed substances(s) (except cannabis) will exclude a participant from receiving ketamine
  • Current or previous abuse of ketamine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Open label, single arm pilot
Initial phase: A small open-label, single arm pilot study (n=5) will be conducted to develop and assess initial feasibility of study procedures and obtain participant feedback through semi-structured exit interviews. All participants in this open-label single arm pilot will receive the intervention (ketamine infusions followed by the brief behavioral intervention). There will be no control condition, randomization, or blinding.
Participants in Arms 1, 2, and 3 will receive four twice-weekly ketamine hydrochloride intravenous infusions dosed at 0.5mg/kg.

Participants in Arm 1 (open label pilot) will receive the brief narrative intervention after four ketamine infusions.

Participants in Arm 2 (those randomized after ketamine infusions are complete to the active arm of the pilot RCT) will receive the brief narrative intervention.

Other Names:
  • Active/intervention
Experimental: Intervention + Minimally Enhanced Usual Care

Second phase: Intervention arm of a single-blind, two-arm, pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=44, 22 per arm) which will (a) assess feasibility benchmarks and (b) collect outcome data that will be used to calculate sample size to power a larger RCT.

Minimally Enhanced Usual Care will consist of educational reading materials regarding chronic back pain and depression.

Participants in Arms 1, 2, and 3 will receive four twice-weekly ketamine hydrochloride intravenous infusions dosed at 0.5mg/kg.

Participants in Arm 1 (open label pilot) will receive the brief narrative intervention after four ketamine infusions.

Participants in Arm 2 (those randomized after ketamine infusions are complete to the active arm of the pilot RCT) will receive the brief narrative intervention.

Other Names:
  • Active/intervention
Minimally Enhanced Usual Care will consist of educational reading materials regarding chronic back pain and depression and will be provided to participants in arms 2 and 3 (pilot RCT).
Other Names:
  • Control
Active Comparator: Minimally Enhanced Usual Care Only

Second phase: Control arm of a single-blind, two-arm, pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=44, 22 per arm) which will (a) assess feasibility benchmarks and (b) collect outcome data that will be used to calculate sample size to power a larger RCT.

Minimally Enhanced Usual Care will consist of educational reading materials regarding chronic back pain and depression.

Participants in Arms 1, 2, and 3 will receive four twice-weekly ketamine hydrochloride intravenous infusions dosed at 0.5mg/kg.
Minimally Enhanced Usual Care will consist of educational reading materials regarding chronic back pain and depression and will be provided to participants in arms 2 and 3 (pilot RCT).
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference (PROMIS Short Form v1.1 Pain Interference 6b)
Time Frame: Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Pain interference, defined as the extent to which pain impedes enjoyment of and participation in life activities (including cognitive, social, recreational, and self-care activities), will be the primary outcome. Raw scores (range 6 - 30, higher scores indicating more interference) are normed to mean of general population (T-score 50; SD 10); higher T-scores indicate higher pain interference. Minimum clinically important change is 3.0 - 3.5 point reduction in the T-score.
Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Pain intensity will be measured using the NRS, a single-item measure where participants rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). In chronic pain, a reduction of 2 points or 30% is considered a meaningful improvement.
Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Depression (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self Report (QIDS-SR) )
Time Frame: Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self Report (QIDS-SR) is a 16-item rating scale assessing self-report of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 - 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Reductions of approximately 30% are considered clinically meaningful improvements in depressive symptoms.
Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Enrollment
Time Frame: 18 months from start of study
Enrollment benchmarks involve aiming to enroll 2-4 participants/month.
18 months from start of study
Presence of adverse events (AE)s
Time Frame: Visits 1-7 or weekly (whichever is more frequent); Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Safety will be assessed via Adverse event (AE) assessment which will be obtained by means of a standard form assessing the presence of AEs.
Visits 1-7 or weekly (whichever is more frequent); Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Pain Interference (PROMIS Short Form v1.1 Pain Interference 6b)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 5 (post ketamine pre randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Pain interference will also be measured at these additional time points. Participants rate each item regarding experiences over the past 7 days on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (Very much). Raw scores (range 6 - 30, higher scores indicating more interference) are normed to mean of general population (T-score 50; SD 10); higher T-scores indicate higher pain interference. Minimum clinically important change is 3.0 - 3.5 point reduction in the T-score.
Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 5 (post ketamine pre randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Pain Intensity (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 5 (post ketamine pre randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Pain intensity will also be measured at these additional time points. Pain intensity will be measured using the NRS, a single-item measure where participants rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). In chronic pain, a reduction of 2 points or 30% is considered a meaningful improvement.
Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 5 (post ketamine pre randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Depression (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self Report (QIDS-SR) )
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 5 (post ketamine pre randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Depression will also be measured at these additional time points.
Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 5 (post ketamine pre randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Acceptability
Time Frame: Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Participants will rate acceptability in multiple domains (helpfulness; convenience and comfort; satisfaction) on a 1-4 scale (1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, 4=very satisfied). Benchmarks for acceptability include >70% "somewhat" or "very satisfied" in all domains.
Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Global Impression of Change (Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC))
Time Frame: Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Participants rate their change overall on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Cognitive Flexibility (Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS))
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Cognitive flexibility refers to individuals' awareness of alternatives to a given situation, willingness to consider them, and belief that they can adapt. Individuals rate 12-items of the Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS) on a 6 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree), total score range 12 - 72. Higher scores indicate more cognitive flexibility.
Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Psychological Flexibility (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ-9))
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Psychological flexibility refers to individuals' ability to both recognize and accept emotions and choose their subsequent action based on core beliefs and values (rather than a reflexive emotional response). It will be assessed via the 9-item Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ-9).
Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Psychological Inflexibility (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQII))
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Psychological inflexibility will be assessed by the 7-item Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQII).
Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Psychologically insightful experiences occurring in response to ketamine administration (Psychological Insight Questionnaire (PIQ))
Time Frame: Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization)
The Psychological Insight Questionnaire (PIQ) is a 23-item questionnaire developed to assess acute discoveries or realizations occasioned by a psychedelic experience, such as those regarding one's personality, relationships, behavioral patterns, or emotions. We will use the PIQ to assess changes in response to ketamine.
Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization)
Mystical Experiences Occasioned by Ketamine (Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ))
Time Frame: Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization)
The Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) is a 30-item validated measure assessing 4 factors of a mystical or psychedelic experience occasioned by ketamine. These include a mystical experience (e.g., "freedom from the limitations of your personal self and feeling a unity or bond with what was felt to be greater than your personal self"), positive mood (e.g., "sense of awe or awesomeness"), transcendence of time and space, and ineffability (feeling that the experience cannot be conveyed in words).
Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization)
Catastrophizing (Catastrophizing Subscale from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-CAT))
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Catastrophizing (the tendency to think of the future as irrationally negative) associates with poor outcomes in the setting of chronic pain, including poorer functional status. It will be measured via the 6-item Catastrophizing Subscale from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-CAT).
Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Self-Efficacy (PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions - Managing Daily Activities -Short Form 4a)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Self-efficacy is a cognitive tendency to perceive oneself as capable of managing life's problems. It will be measured via the 4-item PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions - Managing Daily Activities -Short Form 4a.
Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Fear-Avoidance Beliefs/Kinesiophobia (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-Physical Activity Subscale (FABQ-PA))
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Fear-avoidance beliefs refers to the cognitive appraisal that certain kinds of activities may cause additional damage or pain; more fear-avoidance beliefs for physical activity (also called kinesiophobia) predict development of chronic pain and disability in those with acute low back pain. Fear-avoidance beliefs will be measured using the 4-item Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-Physical Activity Subscale (FABQ-PA).
Visit 1 (Baseline) , Visit 5 (post ketamine infusions pre randomization), Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization), Visit 8 (1 month follow up), Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Nociplastic Pain Characteristics (Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ))
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline)
The Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ), adapted from the American College of Rheumatology Fibromyalgia Survey score, will be used to measure pain widespreadness and accompanying symptoms, also known as nociplastic features. It consists of two scales, the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and the Symptom Severity score (SSS). The WPI instructs participants to indicate location(s) of pain (range 0 - 19, higher scores indicate more areas of pain). The SS score assesses additional symptoms including fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, and cognitive disruption (range 0 -12, higher scores indicate more symptoms). Total score range is 0 - 31, with higher scores indicating more nociplastic features of pain. Fibromyalgia screening positive cut points are WPI >=7 and SSS >=5 OR WPI of 4-6 and SSS >= 9.
Visit 1 (Baseline)
Neuropathic Pain Characteristics (painDETECT)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline)
PainDETECT will be used to evaluate presence of neuropathic features of back pain. PainDETECT instructs individuals to rate pain at different time points (range 0 - 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain), and to select/rate agreement with items on a Likert scale from never to very strongly. Total score range is 0 - 38, with those scoring >18 having likely neuropathic components of back pain.
Visit 1 (Baseline)
Feasibility - retention/attendance
Time Frame: Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Target >70% of participants who complete baseline measures will complete all four ketamine infusion sessions, the behavioral intervention (if assigned) and the initial post-intervention assessment battery.
Visit 7 (8-10 days post randomization)
Feasibility - measurement completion
Time Frame: Visit 9 (3 month follow up)
Target >80% of participants complete follow-up assessments.
Visit 9 (3 month follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Victoria D Powell, MD, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Ketamine hydrochloride

3
Subscribe