Intra-articular Polyacrylamide Hydrogel in Gonarthrosis

May 20, 2024 updated by: Research Centre BIOFORM

Multicenter Open Post-registration Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Medical Device HBIS Endoprosthesis of Synovial Fluid NOLTREX™ According to TU 9398-00152820385-2015 for Intraarticular Administration in the Treatment of Gonarthrosis.

The aim of this open post-marketing study is to assess safety and efficacy duration of HBIS IA injection after 1st and 2nd course in patients with gonarthrosis with long-term follow-up

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Hydrous biopolymer with silver ions (further - HBIS) under trademark NOLTREX™ based on polyacrylamide hydrogel is intended for a symptomatic effect leading to the decrease of joint pain intensity and improvement of functional joint characteristics. Therefore, HBIS is intended for symptom-modifying therapy of joint osteoarthritis (hereinafter - OA). The aim of this study is to estimate safety and efficacy of intra-articular injections of HBIS after 1st and 2nd course in patients with gonarthrosis with long-term follow-up. Patients, who received 1 сourse - 2 injections of NOLTREX™ in first 6-month study IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019, will receive a repeated course of treatment strictly according to indications. The scheme of the 2nd Course is one or two 4.0 ml dosage injections of NOLTREX™ with 1-week interval on week 0 or week 13 of the study. Outcomes will estimate by WOMAC Index at Week 13 and at Week 25.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Non-budgetary healthcare facility "Railway clinical hospital n.a. Semashko N.A. at Lublino, OJSC "Russian Railways"
      • Omsk, Russian Federation
        • "Clinical Diagnostic Center "Ultramed", LLC
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Private Healthcare Facilty "Clinical hospital "RZHD-Medicina" of the city Saint-Petersburg
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
        • State budgetary healthcare facility of Yaroslavl Region "Clinical hospital №3"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women above 50 years;
  • A signed Patient Informed Consent Form by the study participant;
  • Verified knee osteoarthritis in accordance with the ACR (knee pain combined with one of the following signs: age above 50 years, knee crepitus or morning joint stiffness lasting for less than 30 minutes combined with radiologic signs of knee osteoarthritis);
  • Kellgren Lawrence radiological grade II-III knee osteoarthritis with the predominant involvement of the medial tibiofemoral region of the knee joint;
  • Completion of participation in clinical study protocol IA / PAAG-SI / OA / 2019 in the NOLTREX ™ medical device group with the completion of all 5 visits (25 weeks)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy and breastfeeding;
  2. History of trauma or surgery on the target knee joint;
  3. Instability of the target knee joint;
  4. Microcrystalline arthropathies (according to the history and taking into account clinical manifestations);
  5. History of systemic inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.);
  6. Seronegative spondyloarthritis and reactive arthritis;
  7. Increased rheumatoid factor;
  8. Increased uric acid > 360 µmol/l;
  9. Intra-articular injection into the target knee joint:

    • hyaluronates - within 12 months prior to patient enrollment in the study;
    • other synovial fluid endoprostheses (except for NOLTREX™ in the IA/PAAG- SI/OA/2019 study) within 24 months;
    • glucocorticoids - within 1 month before enrollment in the study;
    • NSAIDs - intra-articular injection at any time in the history.
  10. Systemic pain medications (NSAIDs, opioid analgesics) within 1 week prior to Visit 0;
  11. Effusion in the target joint;
  12. The presence of inflammation or infection in the target joint, synovitis;
  13. The need for continuous use of glucocorticoids in any dosage form;
  14. Use of paracetamol within 48 hours prior to Visit 0;
  15. A positive blood test result for one or more of the following infections: HIV, hepatitis B and C, syphilis;
  16. Severe liver disease, defined as an increase in one of the following: ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, GGT more than 3 times the upper limit of normal;
  17. Kidney disease with a glomerular filtration rate as assessed by the Cockcraft-Gault formula less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (stages III-V chronic kidney disease [CKD]);
  18. Clinical manifest coxarthrosis;
  19. Severe decompensated chronic or acute diseases and other conditions or other causes that, in the investigator's opinion, may prevent the patient from participating in the study or affect the study results ;
  20. Participation in any other clinical study other than study IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 within 90 days prior to enrollment in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: hydrous biopolymer with silver ions "Argiform"

Sixty-seven patients were screened for the study; 2 of them were screening failures, therefore, 65 patients were randomized to participate in the study, who were conventionally divided into subgroups:

  • Group A included 5 patients. Patients in group A received 2 courses of therapy: both within IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study and at Visit 1 (and as indicated at Visit 2) of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2020 study.
  • Group B - 43 patients. Patients in group B also received 2 courses of therapy: both within IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study and at Visit 3 (and as indicated at Visit 4) of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2020 study.
  • Group C - 17 patients. Group C included patients who received only one course of injections in the placebo-controlled study IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019. There were no early withdrawals from the study.
Patients will receive an injection of MD NOLTREX™ into the target knee joint. MD will be administered in accordance with the instructions for use of MD NOLTREX™: 4.0 ml per injection (2.5 + 1.5 ml, or 2.0 + 2.0 ml from two syringes through one needle [one puncture]) at intervals of one week. The course within this open study is a maximum of 2 injections. The number of injections is determined by the doctor depending on the stage of gonarthrosis and the clinical response
Other Names:
  • Synovial fluid endoprosthesis NOLTREX™
  • Polyacrylamide hydrogel with silver ions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the total score of WOMAC scale (WOMAC-T)
Time Frame: Change in WOMAC Total Score (WOMAC-T) at Visit 3 (Week 11), Visit 5 (Week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label study and from baseline at Visit 1 (Week 1) of IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study;

By Visit 3, the mean WOMAC-T (Osteoarthritis Index Total Score) compared to Visit 1 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study has changed by 430.20 ± 470.50 (95% CI -1014.40 - 154.00) in patients from group A, by 727.16 ± 353.78 (95% CI -836.04 - -618.28) in patients from group B, by 654.35 ± 241.28 (95% CI -778.41 - -530 ,30) in patients from group C. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.169).

By Visit 5, the mean WOMAC-T score compared to Visit 1 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study has changed by 470.60 ± 495.56 (95% CI -1085.92 - 144.72) in patients from group A, by 829.53 ± 367.38 (95% CI -942.60 - -716.47) in patients from group B, by 688.53 ± 231.50 (95% CI -807.56 - -569 .50) in patients from group C. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.057).

Change in WOMAC Total Score (WOMAC-T) at Visit 3 (Week 11), Visit 5 (Week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label study and from baseline at Visit 1 (Week 1) of IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study;

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the pain subscale score (WOMAC-A)
Time Frame: Change in the subscale of pain (WOMAC-A) at Visit 3 (Week 11), Visit 5 (Week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label study and from baseline at Visit 1 (Week 1) of IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study;

By Visit 3, the mean WOMAC-A (pain subscale) score compared to Visit 1 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study has decreased by 87.80 ± 87.45 (95% CI -196.38 - 20.78) in patients from group A, by 146.00 ± 74.46 (95% CI -168.91 - -123.09) in patients from group B, by 151.88 ± 64.56 (95% CI -185.07 - -118 .69) in patients from group C. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.212).

By Visit 5, the mean WOMAC-A score compared to Visit 1 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study has decreased by 95.80 ± 95.49 (95% CI -214.37 - 22.77) in patients from group A, by 163.05 ± 75.82 (95% CI -186.38 - -139.71) in patients from group B, by 155.06 ± 63.49 (95% CI -187.70 - -122 .41) in patients from group C. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.168).

Change in the subscale of pain (WOMAC-A) at Visit 3 (Week 11), Visit 5 (Week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label study and from baseline at Visit 1 (Week 1) of IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study;
Change of rigidity (WOMAC-B) and functionality (WOMAC-C) subscale scores
Time Frame: Change in the subscale of stiffness (WOMAC-B) and functionality (WOMAC-C) at Visit 3 (Week 11), Visit 5 (Week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label study and from baseline at Visit 1 (Week 1) of IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study;

By Visit 3, the mean WOMAC-B (subscale for assessing stiffness) score compared to Visit 1 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study has decreased by 62.80 ± 69.82 (95% CI -149.49 - 23.89) in patients from group A, by 67.19 ± 40.91 (95% CI -79.78 - -54.60) in patients from group B, by 48.71 ± 28.08 (95% CI -63.14 - -34 .27) in patients from group C. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.291).

By Visit 5, the mean WOMAC-B score compared to Visit 1 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study has decreased by 66.40 ± 70.26 (95% CI -153.64 - 20.84) in patients from group A, by 74.60 ± 42.67 (95% CI -87.74 - -61.47) in patients from group B, by 57.82 ± 28.11 (95% CI -72.27 - -43 .37) in patients from group C. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.376).

Change in the subscale of stiffness (WOMAC-B) and functionality (WOMAC-C) at Visit 3 (Week 11), Visit 5 (Week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label study and from baseline at Visit 1 (Week 1) of IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study;
Intensity of pain in the target knee joint (100-mm VAS)
Time Frame: Change in the severity of pain in the target knee joint according to 100 mm visual analogue scale (100 mm VAS) at Visit 2 (week 1), Visit 3 (week 11), Visit 5 (week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label safety study and from baseli
During the period of this study (CS2), the decrease of this indicator continued, and at Visit 3, VAS scores of groups A, B and C patients were 11.2 ± 6.53, 29.07 ± 15.29 and 21.53 ± 6.32 mm, respectively, and by Visit 5 the indicators decreased to 6.2 ± 5.59, 16.56 ± 12.32 and 4.88 ± 3.14 mm, respectively. At both visits, the between-group differences were statistically significant, which was due to the higher scores in group B. Combined score of groups A and B was compared with the score in group C, and there were also statistically significant between-group differences (p < 0.05 from Visit 3 to Visit 5), which was consistent with the approach to dividing patients into groups: patients in group C received only one course of injections in the placebo-controlled study CS1 (IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019) and had no indications for repeated injections, while patients in groups A and B have a requirement to receive two courses of therapy
Change in the severity of pain in the target knee joint according to 100 mm visual analogue scale (100 mm VAS) at Visit 2 (week 1), Visit 3 (week 11), Visit 5 (week 23) from baseline at Visit 0 (Screening) of the open-label safety study and from baseli
Patient's assessment of the treatment efficacy
Time Frame: Evaluation of treatment effectiveness by the patient (using a scale from 1 - a definitive deterioration to 6 - a significant improvement) at Visits 3 and 5 (OEP-w11 and OEP-w23 scores, respectively);
At visit 3 patients evaluation scores from Group B as, significant improvement was indicated by 3 patients, improvement - by 23 patients, weak improvement - 15 patients and no changes -0 patients. from patients Group C improvement was indicated by - 4 patients, weak improvement - 8 patients and no changes - 5 patients and from Group A patients was not indicate any changes with p (between the groups <0.001) At visit 5 patients Group B scores as, significant improvement was indicated by 6 patients, improvement - by 25 patients, weak improvement - 12 patients and no changes -0 patients. from patients Group C improvement was indicated by - 16 patients, weak improvement - 1 patient and no changes - 0 patients and from Group A patients - significant improvement was indicated by - 4 patients and improvement were indicated by 1 patient, no changes were indicated by 0 patients with p (between the groups <0.001)
Evaluation of treatment effectiveness by the patient (using a scale from 1 - a definitive deterioration to 6 - a significant improvement) at Visits 3 and 5 (OEP-w11 and OEP-w23 scores, respectively);
Investigator's assessment of the treatment efficacy
Time Frame: Evaluation of treatment effectiveness by the investigator (using a scale from 1 - a definitive deterioration to 6 - a significant improvement) at Visits 3 and 5 (OEI-w11 and OEI-w23 scores, respectively);
At visit 3 investigators evaluation for Group B scores as significant improvement was indicated by 3 investigators - improvement - by 23, weak improvement - 14 and no changes -3 investigators. from Group C - improvement was indicated by - 4 investigators, weak improvement - 8 and no changes - 5 and from Group A- significant improvement was indicated by - 2 investigators improvement - by 2 and weak improvement by 2 investigators with p (between the groups <0.001) At visit 5 investigators evaluation for Group B scores as significant improvement was indicated by 3 investigators, improvement - by 23, weak improvement - 14 and no changes -3 from Group C - improvement was indicated by - 4, weak improvement - 8 and no changes - 5 and from Group A significant improvement was indicated by - 2 investigators improvement were indicated by 2 and weak improvement by 2 investigators with p (between the groups <0.001)
Evaluation of treatment effectiveness by the investigator (using a scale from 1 - a definitive deterioration to 6 - a significant improvement) at Visits 3 and 5 (OEI-w11 and OEI-w23 scores, respectively);
Total number of NSAID tablets taken
Time Frame: Assessment of the total number of NSAID tablets taken according to the patient's diary starting from Day 1, at Visits 3 and 5 (NSAID-w11 and NSAID-w23, respectively);
The results obtained show a favorable long-term effect of intra-articular NOLTREX™ in the treatment of Kellgren-Lawrence radiological stage II-III knee osteoarthritis on the function of the knee joint. It was impossible to evaluate the need for NSAID due to the fact during the study period of CS 2, no such cases were recorded.
Assessment of the total number of NSAID tablets taken according to the patient's diary starting from Day 1, at Visits 3 and 5 (NSAID-w11 and NSAID-w23, respectively);
The JSN score of the target knee
Time Frame: The JSN score of the target knee at Visit 5 of the open-label study compared with the baseline at Visit 0 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study retrospectively.
The JSN score of the target knee at Visit 5 of the open-label study compared with the baseline at Visit 0 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study in patients from group A was -0.02 ± 0.05, in patients from group B - 0.00 ± 0.19, in patients from group C - 0.02 ± 0.08. Intergroup differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.379). The JSN index of the target knee joint reflects the disease progression, and the absence of changes or a decrease in the index indicates a protective effect of NOLTREX™.
The JSN score of the target knee at Visit 5 of the open-label study compared with the baseline at Visit 0 of the IA/PAAG-SI/OA/2019 study retrospectively.
Total number of paracetamol tablets taken
Time Frame: Assessment of the total number of paracetamol tablets taken according to the patient's diary (one tablet = 500 mg) starting from Day 1, at Visits 3 and 5 (PARACETAMOL-w11 and PARACETAMOL-w23 scores, respectively);
The results obtained show a favorable long-term effect of intra-articular NOLTREX™ in the treatment of Kellgren-Lawrence radiological stage II-III knee osteoarthritis on the function of the knee joint. It was impossible to evaluate the need for paracetamol due to the fact during the study period of CS 2, no such cases were recorded.
Assessment of the total number of paracetamol tablets taken according to the patient's diary (one tablet = 500 mg) starting from Day 1, at Visits 3 and 5 (PARACETAMOL-w11 and PARACETAMOL-w23 scores, respectively);

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on hydrous biopolymer with silver ions "Argiform"

3
Subscribe