Srovnání techniky Single versus Double Perclose pro TAVR (Single)
Využití jednoduchého versus dvojitého perclose zařízení pro transfemorální aortální chlopeň s výměnou přístupového místa: Prospektivní, multicentrická, randomizovaná kontrolovaná studie
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become widely recognized as a minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. It has been proven to be a safe and effective option for patients who are at low, intermediate, and prohibitive risk for surgical valve replacement.
One of the critical components of procedural success in a transfemoral approach is access site management, as vascular complications strongly correlate with adverse outcomes. When major vascular complications occur, there are higher rates of major bleeding, transfusions, and renal failure requiring dialysis, as well as a significantly higher rate of 30-day and 1-year mortality. In recent years, a "preclosure" technique has emerged as a common vascular closure approach using a Perclose Proglide system (Abbott Vascular), in which sutures are deployed before dilating the arterial access site. This allows for arterial closure after dilation to sizing up to larger bore access sheaths that accommodate valve delivery systems. The sutures are subsequently harvested and tightened to close the large bore arteriotomy site at the end of the case. It has been demonstrated that the use of two Perclose devices, or double Perclose closure, is an effective closure technique with a low rate of vascular complications. A large number of TAVR centers have adopted this method for large-bore vascular closure. In the past, there have been few investigations comparing the utilization of a single Perclose device compared to a double Perclose technique. There are numerous theoretical advantages to the use of a single device, which include decreased procedural cost and procedural time. The investigation aimed to determine if there are clinical benefits as well using the single Perclose approach.
Přehled studie
Postavení
Podmínky
Intervence / Léčba
Detailní popis
SINGLE-CLOSURE (The utilization of Single versus double perclose devices for transfemoral aortIc valve replacement access site Closure) is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The study was approved by the local ethics committees of all participating centers, and each patient provided written informed consent for inclusion in the trial. Data management and analysis was performed by an independent data coordinating center, with oversight from a steering committee. The members of the steering committee had full access to the data and vouch for the accuracy and complete- ness of the data and the analyses. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Patients scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVR were considered for inclusion in the trial if they met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were an indication for TAVR as judged by the local heart team; selection of the transfemoral access route and a commercially available transcatheter aortic valve; and willingness to comply with protocol specified follow-up evaluations. Principal exclusion criteria were a vascular access site anatomy not suitable for percutaneous vascular closure and the occurrence of vascular access site complications before the TAVR procedure. Additional exclusion criteria were a known allergy or hypersensitivity to any VCD component; unstable active bleeding or bleeding diathesis or significant unman-ageable anemia; absence of computed tomographic data of the access site before the procedure; systemic infection or a local infection at or near the access site; life expectancy of <6 months because of noncardiac conditions; patients who cannot adhere to or complete the investigational protocol for any reason; pregnant or nursing patients; and participation in any other interventional trial.
The primary end point of the trial was the rate of access site or access-related major and minor vascular complications defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. The end point was assessed during index hospitalization. Relationship to the access site was deter- mined according to the site used for the large-bore vascular access sheath.
Secondary end points included the rate of the primary end point at 30 days; components of the primary end point in-hospital and at 30 days; in-hospital and 30-day major and minor vascular complications; unplanned vascular surgery or use of endovascular stent or stent-graft or other endovascular interventions at the puncture site; in-hospital and 30-day access site- or access-related minor, major, and disabling or life threatening bleeding; need for blood transfusion for access site- or access-related bleeding or vascular complications; rate of VCD failure, defined as the failure of a closure device strategy to achieve hemostasis with the need for an alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning); in-hospital and 30-day all-cause death; in-hospital and 30-day death attributed to access site or access-related complications; need and number of additional unplanned VCDs; time to hemostasis, defined as the time from VCD application to complete hemostasis; and the length of postprocedural hospital stay.
Typ studie
Zápis (Aktuální)
Fáze
- Nelze použít
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní místa
-
-
-
Beijing, Čína
- Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
-
Beijing, Čína
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University
-
-
Anhui
-
Bengbu, Anhui, Čína
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, Čína
- Fujian Provincial Hospital
-
-
Gansu
-
Lanzhou, Gansu, Čína
- The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, Čína
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, Čína
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
-
Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Čína
- The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
-
-
Guangxi
-
Yulin, Guangxi, Čína
- Yulin First People's Hospital
-
-
Henan
-
Changshacun, Henan, Čína
- Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, Čína
- Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, Čína
- Henan Provincial Chest Hospital
-
-
Hunan
-
Changsha, Hunan, Čína
- The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang, Liaoning, Čína
- General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, PLA
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, Čína
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
-
Qingdao, Shandong, Čína
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
-
Qingdao, Shandong, Čína
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital
-
-
Shanxi
-
Xi’an, Shanxi, Čína
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu, Sichuan, Čína
- Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
-
-
Xinjiang
-
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, Čína
- People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Čína, 310000
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
-
Huzhou, Zhejiang, Čína
- Huzhou Central Hospital
-
Ningbo, Zhejiang, Čína
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University
-
Ningbo, Zhejiang, Čína
- Ningbo Medical Center Li Huili Hospital
-
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Čína
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVR were considered for inclusion in the trial if they met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were an indication for TAVR as judged by the local heart team; selection of the transfemoral access route and a commercially available transcatheter aortic valve; and willingness to comply with protocol specified follow-up evaluations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Principal exclusion criteria were a vascular access site anatomy not suitable for percutaneous vascular closure and the occurrence of vascular access site complications before the TAVR procedure. Additional exclusion criteria were a known allergy or hypersensitivity to any VCD component; unstable active bleeding or bleeding diathesis or significant unman ageable anemia; absence of computed tomographic data of the access site before the procedure; systemic infection or a local infection at or near the access site; life expectancy of <6 months because of noncardiac conditions; patients who can-not adhere to or complete the investigational protocol for any reason; pregnant or nursing patients; and participation in any other interventional trial.
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Léčba
- Přidělení: Randomizované
- Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
- Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Aktivní komparátor: Double Perclose device
Double Perclose device ( Perclose Proglide system, Abbott Vascular) was used for large bore arteriotomy site closure during TF-TAVR procedures |
"Preclosure" technique has emerged as a common vascular closure approach using a Perclose Proglide system (Abbott Vascular), in which sutures are deployed before dilating the arterial access site. |
|
Experimentální: Single Perclose device
Single Perclose device ( Perclose Proglide system, Abbott Vascular) was used for large bore arteriotomy site closure during TF-TAVR procedures |
"Preclosure" technique has emerged as a common vascular closure approach using a Perclose Proglide system (Abbott Vascular), in which sutures are deployed before dilating the arterial access site. |
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
The primary end point of the trial was the rate of access site or access-related major and minor vascular complications defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria
Časové okno: The end point was assessed during index hospitalization
|
|
The end point was assessed during index hospitalization
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
The rate of the primary end point at 30 days
Časové okno: 30 days
|
the rate of access site or access-related major and minor vascular complications at 30 days |
30 days
|
|
Components of the primary end point in-hospital and at 30 days
Časové okno: 30 days
|
Components of the rate of access site or access-related major and minor vascular complications at 30 days |
30 days
|
|
In-hospital and 30-day major and minor vascular complications
Časové okno: 30 days
|
In-hospital and 30-day major and minor vascular complications |
30 days
|
|
Unplanned vascular surgery or use of endovascular stent or stent-graft or other endovascular interventions at the puncture site
Časové okno: 30 days
|
Unplanned vascular surgery or use of endovascular stent or stent-graft or other endovascular interventions at the puncture site at 30 days |
30 days
|
|
in-hospital and 30-day access site- or access-related minor, major, and disabling or life- threatening bleeding; need for blood transfusion for access site or access related bleeding or vascular complications
Časové okno: 30 days
|
in-hospital and 30-day access site- or access-related minor, major, and disabling or life- threatening bleeding; need for blood transfusion for access site or access related bleeding or vascular complications |
30 days
|
|
Rate of VCD failure, defined as the failure of a closure device strategy to achieve hemostasis with the need for an alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning)
Časové okno: 30 days
|
Rate of VCD failure, defined as the failure of a closure device strategy to achieve hemostasis with the need for an alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning) at 30 days |
30 days
|
|
In-hospital and 30-day all-cause death; in-hospital and 30-day death attributed to access site- access-related complications; need and number of additional unplanned VCDs
Časové okno: 30 days
|
In-hospital and 30-day all-cause death; in-hospital and 30-day death attributed to access site- access-related complications; need and number of additional unplanned VCDs |
30 days
|
|
Time to hemostasis, defined as the time from VCD application to complete hemostasis
Časové okno: 30 days
|
Time to hemostasis, defined as the time from VCD application to complete at 30 days |
30 days
|
|
The length of postprocedural hospital stay
Časové okno: 30 days
|
The length of postprocedural hospital stay |
30 days
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Vyšetřovatelé
- Studijní židle: Jianan Wang, PhD, Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Aktuální)
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Klíčová slova
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- SAHZJU CT022
Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)
Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
produkt vyrobený a vyvážený z USA
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .