- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT06689930
Community-basierte Implementierung von STAC
Gemeindebasierte Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention, die die Gesundheit nach (ungefähr) einer Geburt mit Bluthochdruck während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Geburt verbessern
This study is being done to adapt the Staying Healthy After Childbirth (STAC) intervention for implementation among Black Women and Birthing Persons (WBP).
Studienübersicht
Status
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are windows into chronic disease risk. The immediate postpartum (PP) period (6 weeks) is the highest risk and most important period for prevention of serious adverse outcomes with long term consequences. This project focuses on a multicomponent evidence-based intervention, Staying Healthy After Childbirth (STAC) that has been tested in a Midwest academic hospital. The intervention has been shown to be effective at addressing factors associated with health promotion priorities in populations with high levels of health disparities and inequities by increasing access to hypertension (HTN) care in the critical PP window by providing patients a home blood pressure monitor and access to a dedicated healthcare team that provides remote BP surveillance and antihypertensive medication titration. To optimize STAC to prevent and reduce racial disparities in immediate PP morbidity and mortality, deeper engagement with community stakeholders is critical.
This is a qualitative investigation designed as pre-implementation of the Adapted Staying Healthy After Childbirth (A-STAC) intervention.
STAC-Community Advisory Board (CAB) members and Lived Experience Group members will provide qualitative data through semi-structured interviews regarding implementation factors of STAC, including priorities for adaptation, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and usability. Rapid qualitative analysis will be used to glean themes from the qualitative data. A second round of semi-structured focus groups using the nominal decision-making process will be conducted to address the revisions to implementation strategies and determine priorities for A-STAC. Next, abbreviated study cycles to test implementation (Plan-Do-Study-Act or PDSA cycles) will take place, with Community Based Organization (CBO) partners and participating Black pregnant persons. After each PDSA cycle, interviews and surveys with patients and staff will be conducted. Rapid qualitative analysis will again be used to gain information about the usability of A-STAC from the focus group; this information will then be used to refine the A-STAC intervention. This process will be repeated for a second PDSA cycle (up to three PDSA cycles total), after which the A-STAC intervention will be finalized for implementation (registered to a separate ClinicalTrials.gov record).
Step 1: Conduct interviews with STAC-CAB members (8-12 members) and Lived Experience Group members (8-12 members) to evaluate implementation factors and priorities for adaptation of STAC.
Use rapid qualitative analysis process to glean implementation strategies.
Step 2: Conduct small focus groups (3-4 participants per group) with STAC-CAB members (8-12 members) and Lived Experience Group members separately using nominal group decision decision making process.
Address revisions to implementation strategies and priorities for A-STAC.
Step 3: Conduct PDSA cycles and follow-up interviews and surveys for patients (3-5 participants per cycle, 10 total) and CBO staff (at least 2 staff).
Step 4: Incorporate usability data from cycle 1 to refine A-STAC.
Repeat steps 3-4 for additional PDSA cycles (up to 3).
Step 5: Finalize A-STAC Intervention.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, Vereinigte Staaten, 53792
- University of Wisconsin
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria (Interviews and Focus Groups):
- Belong to the STAC-CAB or Lived Experience Group
- Aged 18 or older
Inclusion Criteria (CBO Staff):
- Staff of CBO participating in PDSA cycle
- Aged 18 years or older
Inclusion Criteria (PDSA-Cycles):
- Pregnant persons greater than or equal to 24 weeks gestation and prior to delivery or postpartum
- Self-Identify as African American or Black
- Aged 18 years or older
- Capable of providing informed consent in English
- Can follow M•care System use instructions in English
- Have ownership of a functioning and reliable smartphone to upload and use the M•other App
- Interested in preventing or managing blood pressure during pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria (PDSA-Cycles):
- Persistent second or third trimester bleeding at time of enrollment
- Premature rupture of membranes in the current pregnancy at time of enrollment
- Known unrepaired maternal congenital heart disease requiring surgical correction
- Maternal heart failure
- Chronic kidney disease specifically requiring dialysis
- On greater than two antihypertensive medications at time of enrollment
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: STAC-CAB Members
Staying Healthy After Childbirth - Community Advisory Board members (8-12 members) |
|
|
Kein Eingriff: Lived Experience Group Members
Lived Experience Group members (8-12 members) |
|
|
Experimental: PDSA Cycle Participants and CBO Staff
Black pregnant or postpartum persons and Community Based Organization Staff |
Conduct PDSA cycles and follow-up interviews and surveys for patients (3-5 per cycle, 10 total) and CBO staff (no less than 2) |
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Qualitative Summary of Barriers to Implementation of A-STAC
Zeitfenster: up to 4 weeks
|
Barriers to implementation of A-STAC in CBOs will be investigated via qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with STAC-CAB members. All feedback regarding barriers will be coded for themes summarized by participant count. |
up to 4 weeks
|
|
Qualitative Summary of Facilitators to Implementation of A-STAC
Zeitfenster: up to 4 weeks
|
Facilitators to implementation of A-STAC in CBOs will be investigated via qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with STAC-CAB members. All feedback regarding facilitators will be coded for themes summarized by participant count. |
up to 4 weeks
|
|
Qualitative Summary of Adaptations to STAC
Zeitfenster: up to 8 weeks
|
Adaptations to STAC will be analyzed from patient participant interviews and CBO staff participants post-PDSA cycles. Interviews will be coded for themes summarized by count. |
up to 8 weeks
|
|
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Zeitfenster: up to 8 weeks
|
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) measures intervention acceptability with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. |
up to 8 weeks
|
|
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Zeitfenster: up to 8 weeks
|
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) measures intervention appropriateness with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. |
up to 8 weeks
|
|
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Zeitfenster: up to 8 weeks
|
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) measures intervention feasibility with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. |
up to 8 weeks
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Kara Hoppe, DO, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Hauptermittler: Andrew Garbacz, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Nützliche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 2024-1594
- U48DP006793 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
- Protocol Approved 5/14/26 (Andere Kennung: UW Madison)
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .