Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Comparing the Efficacy of LDA, LHAA, and LA Regimens in Young Adults With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

11. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Huafeng Wang, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy of LDA, LHAA, and LA Regimens in Young Adults With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

This is a phase II/III, multicenter, randomized, three-arm, open-label, parallel controlled trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare the 2-years OS rate of the LDA, LHAA, and LA regimens in newly diagnosed patients with intermediate- and high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who are eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

450

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confirmed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification;
  2. Classified as intermediate- or adverse-risk AML based on the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 genetic risk stratification (see Appendix Table 1);
  3. Age 15-65 years;
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2;
  5. Adequate hepatic and renal function: total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL (35 μmol/L); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2× the upper limit of normal; serum creatinine ≤177 μmol/L;
  6. Normal cardiac function, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50%;
  7. Life expectancy ≥3 months;
  8. Signed written informed consent by the patient or their legally authorized representative prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute promyelocytic leukemia;
  2. Central nervous system involvement by leukemia;
  3. History of other malignancies within the past 5 years;
  4. Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV);
  5. Presence of any other serious medical condition that may limit study participation, including advanced infections, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, severe cardiac insufficiency, or angina;
  6. Ineligible for intensive chemotherapy due to poor general condition;
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  8. Inability to understand or comply with the study protocol;
  9. Inability to take oral medication or presence of malabsorption syndrome;
  10. Prior treatment with B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors or hypomethylating agents, or current participation in any other investigational drug study;
  11. Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Arm A: Lisaftoclax+Daunorubicin+Cytarabine

Participants received induction therapy with lisaftoclax, daunorubicin, and cytarabine.

Patients with partial response (PR) or >60% reduction in bone marrow blasts were allowed to receive one additional induction cycle.

Patients achieving complete response received consolidation therapy with lisaftoclax and intermediate-dose cytarabine for 3 cycles.

For maintenance therapy, patients were classified as post-transplant or non-transplant. Post-transplant patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either lisaftoclax plus azacitidine or azacitidine alone. Non-transplant patients received lisaftoclax in combination with azacitidine.

Maintenance therapy was administered for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first, or until the occurrence of grade ≥4 hematologic toxicity.

Lisaftoclax (200 mg on D2, 400 mg on D3, and 600 mg qd on D4-8, orally) + daunorubicin (60 mg/m², iv, qd, D1-3) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-7).
Andere Namen:
  • Induktionschemotherapie
Lisaftoclax (600 mg, orally, D1-7) + intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m², q12h, D1-3) for 3 cycles
Andere Namen:
  • Konsolidierungsbehandlung
Post-transplant maintenance therapy: patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either combination therapy or azacitidine monotherapy. The combination regimen consisted of lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Azacitidine monotherapy consisted of azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Non-transplant maintenance therapy: lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first.
Andere Namen:
  • Erhaltungsbehandlung
Experimental: Arm B: Lisaftoclax+homoharringtonine+cytarabine+aclarubicin

Participants received induction therapy with lisaftoclax, homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin.

Patients with partial response (PR) or >60% reduction in bone marrow blasts were allowed to receive one additional induction cycle.

Patients achieving complete response received consolidation therapy with lisaftoclax and intermediate-dose cytarabine for 3 cycles.

For maintenance therapy, patients were stratified according to transplantation status (post-transplant or non-transplant). Post-transplant patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either combination therapy or azacitidine monotherapy. Non-transplant patients received combination maintenance therapy.

All maintenance therapies were administered for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first, or until the occurrence of grade ≥4 hematologic toxicity, and were interrupted until recovery to grade ≤2.

Lisaftoclax (200 mg on D2, 400 mg on D3, and 600 mg qd on D4-8, orally) + homoharringtonine (2 mg/m², qd, intramuscular injection or iv infusion, D1-5) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-5) + aclarubicin (12 mg/m², maximum 20 mg, iv, D1-5).
Andere Namen:
  • Induktionschemotherapie
Lisaftoclax (600 mg, orally, D1-7) + intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m², q12h, D1-3) for 3 cycles
Andere Namen:
  • Konsolidierungsbehandlung
Post-transplant maintenance therapy: patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either combination therapy or azacitidine monotherapy. The combination regimen consisted of lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Azacitidine monotherapy consisted of azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Non-transplant maintenance therapy: lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first.
Andere Namen:
  • Erhaltungsbehandlung
Experimental: Arm C:Lisaftoclax+ azacitidine

Participants received induction therapy with lisaftoclax in combination with azacitidine.

Patients with partial response (PR) or >60% reduction in bone marrow blasts were allowed to receive one additional induction cycle.

Patients achieving complete response received consolidation therapy with lisaftoclax and intermediate-dose cytarabine for 3 cycles.

For maintenance therapy, patients were stratified according to transplantation status (post-transplant or non-transplant). Post-transplant patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either combination therapy or azacitidine monotherapy. Non-transplant patients received combination maintenance therapy.

All maintenance therapies were administered for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first, or until the occurrence of grade ≥4 hematologic toxicity, and were interrupted until recovery to grade ≤2.

Lisaftoclax (600 mg, orally, D1-7) + intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m², q12h, D1-3) for 3 cycles
Andere Namen:
  • Konsolidierungsbehandlung
Post-transplant maintenance therapy: patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either combination therapy or azacitidine monotherapy. The combination regimen consisted of lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Azacitidine monotherapy consisted of azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Non-transplant maintenance therapy: lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first.
Andere Namen:
  • Erhaltungsbehandlung
Lisaftoclax (200 mg, orally, D1; 400 mg, orally, D2; 600 mg, orally, qd, D3-28) + azacitidine (75 mg/m², D1-7)
Andere Namen:
  • Induktionschemotherapie

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
2-year overall survival rate (OS)
Zeitfenster: from randomization up to 2 years
defined as the proportion of patients who were still alive from the time of randomization for the last patient until 24 months later
from randomization up to 2 years

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate
Zeitfenster: from randomization up to 2 years after randomization
defined as the proportion of patients remaining free of treatment failure, hematologic relapse, MRD relapse, or death within 2 years after randomization.
from randomization up to 2 years after randomization
2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate
Zeitfenster: from the date of complete remission (CR/CRi) up to 2 years after achieving response
defined as the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and remained alive without disease relapse within 2 years after achieving response.
from the date of complete remission (CR/CRi) up to 2 years after achieving response
Safety and Tolerability
Zeitfenster: up to 24 months
defined as the number of participants with adverse events and serious adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0
up to 24 months
Complete Response (CR) rate after 1/2 treatment cycles
Zeitfenster: At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR) after the first or second cycle of induction chemotherapy.
At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
Composite Complete Response (CRc) rate after 1/2 treatment cycles
Zeitfenster: At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
defined as the proportion of patients achieving CRc after the first or second cycle of induction chemotherapy.
At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate after 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapy
Zeitfenster: At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
defined as the the proportion of patients with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) among patients who achieve complete remission after 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapy
At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. März 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2029

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

27. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

11. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

11. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Akute myeloische Leukämie (AML)

Klinische Studien zur Lisaftoclax+daunorubicin+cytarabine

Abonnieren