- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT02336893
A Semi-structured Interview PACIENTE Improves Communication With Family Members at the Intensive Care Unit (PACIENTE)
Result of an Intervention for the Group of Physicians Responsible for Providing Information on the Satisfaction of the Relatives of Patients Hospitalized in an Intensive Care Unit
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Introduction: Effective communication with physicians is an important factor for families at intensive care unit. Although physicians should have adequate communication skills, training programs are not available that would enable them to enhance this competence. Formal training using a semi-structured interview to improve skills and quality of communication was provided to physicians in charge of supplying information to families at the intensive care unit (ICU).
Objective: To assess whether a formal training strategy using an interview PACIENTE may improve physician's skills and quality of communication with family members at the ICU.
Methods: A pre- and post- intervention study was designed for a university hospital mixed ICU (medical and surgical). Training was provided to 34 resident physicians in charge of giving information to families at the ICU using interview PACIENTE. The interview was done conjointly with participation in simulated difficult clinical cases with actors posing as family members.
Patient registries: Family satisfaction was assessed with a validated survey, FS-ICU 24, in 122 and 123 family members pre- and post-intervention training, respectively, on the fourth day after patient admission to the ICU. The surveys were identified with consecutive numbers and not collected data that would allow subsequent identification of patients or their families. After the intervention, structures of interviews were monitored with checklists designed for this purpose. The meetings were always in the same place for this activity.
The surveys were answered on paper and the data included in an SPSS database by one of the researchers. Single questions in the 24-FS-ICU survey were analyzed according to the author's suggestions with minor modifications. Scores from items 1-6 in the published survey were transformed to scores from 0 to 100. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine any score differences between pre- and post-interventions. Differences of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The sample size was calculated to be 122 participants for pre-intervention and 122 participants for post-intervention to detect α coefficient of 0.05 and with a power of 0.90. The survey was performed in the waiting room and questionnaires were collected immediately; thus, there were no missing questionnaires.
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- That consented to participate in the satisfaction survey
- That whom had been in the ICU for 72 h.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Family members with language barriers (requiring assistance to answer a question in writing)
- Previous ICU admission within the study period
- Patient's death by the fourth day of admission
- Proved reasons for risk of judicial proceedings.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
- Tildeling: Ikke-randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
---|---|
Ingen inngripen: Pre-intervention
Family members of patients admitted to the ICU from August to December 2013 that consented to participate in the satisfaction survey and had been in the ICU for 72 h.
|
|
Eksperimentell: Post-intervention
Family members of patients admitted to the ICU from March to August 2014 that consented to participate in the satisfaction survey and had been in the ICU for 72 h.
|
The final training was provided to a group of 34 residents --from internal medicine, anesthesiology, gynecology, and intensive care-- in charge of giving information to the patient's family members in the ICU.
They were trained in the semi-structured interview PACIENTE (Present oneself and greet, Attend and listen, Call diagnosis, Inform treatment, Expose prognosis, Name introductory phrases to bad news, Take time to provide empathetic comfort, Explain an action plan involving the family) conjointly while participating in simulated difficult clinical cases with family members-actors.
Four training programs were performed from February to September 2014.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Comprehension of the information, measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24. Third question, second part.
Tidsramme: Four months
|
Measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
Third question, second part.
|
Four months
|
Adequate time to address concerns and answer questions, measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24. Tenth question, second part.
Tidsramme: Four months
|
Measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
Tenth question, second part.
|
Four months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Overall satisfaction with care, measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
Tidsramme: Four months
|
Measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
|
Four months
|
Overall satisfaction with decision-making measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
Tidsramme: Four months
|
Measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
|
Four months
|
Global survey satisfaction measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
Tidsramme: Four months
|
Measured with the instrument FS-ICU 24.
|
Four months
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Miguel H Coral, MD, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- Fumis RR, Nishimoto IN, Deheinzelin D. Families' interactions with physicians in the intensive care unit: the impact on family's satisfaction. J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
- Bailey JJ, Sabbagh M, Loiselle CG, Boileau J, McVey L. Supporting families in the ICU: a descriptive correlational study of informational support, anxiety, and satisfaction with care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Apr;26(2):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
- Karlsson C, Tisell A, Engstrom A, Andershed B. Family members' satisfaction with critical care: a pilot study. Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00388.x.
- Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Nielsen EL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Tonelli MR, Patrick DL, Robins LS, McGrath BB, Rubenfeld GD. Studying communication about end-of-life care during the ICU family conference: development of a framework. J Crit Care. 2002 Sep;17(3):147-60. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2002.35929.
- Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Mokhtari M, Le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B; French FAMIREA Group. Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: a multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;163(1):135-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.2005117.
- Brown A, Hijazi M. Arabic translation and adaptation of Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Aug;20(4):291-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn013. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
- Auerbach SM, Kiesler DJ, Wartella J, Rausch S, Ward KR, Ivatury R. Optimism, satisfaction with needs met, interpersonal perceptions of the healthcare team, and emotional distress in patients' family members during critical care hospitalization. Am J Crit Care. 2005 May;14(3):202-10.
- Alexander SC, Keitz SA, Sloane R, Tulsky JA. A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents' communication with patients at the end of life. Acad Med. 2006 Nov;81(11):1008-12. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000242580.83851.ad.
- Lorin S, Rho L, Wisnivesky JP, Nierman DM. Improving medical student intensive care unit communication skills: a novel educational initiative using standardized family members. Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2386-91. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000230239.04781.BD.
- Back AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, Fryer-Edwards KA, Alexander SC, Barley GE, Gooley TA, Tulsky JA. Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):453-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.453.
- Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Billings JA, Peters AS, Block SD; PCEP Core Faculty. Teaching and learning end-of-life care: evaluation of a faculty development program in palliative care. Acad Med. 2005 Jul;80(7):657-68. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200507000-00008.
- Fineberg IC. Preparing professionals for family conferences in palliative care: evaluation results of an interdisciplinary approach. J Palliat Med. 2005 Aug;8(4):857-66. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.857.
- Shaw DJ, Davidson JE, Smilde RI, Sondoozi T, Agan D. Multidisciplinary team training to enhance family communication in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):265-71. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a26ea5.
- Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302-11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302.
- Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Arich C, Brivet F, Brun F, Charles PE, Desmettre T, Dubois D, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goldgran-Toledano D, Herbecq P, Joly LM, Jourdain M, Kaidomar M, Lepape A, Letellier N, Marie O, Page B, Parrot A, Rodie-Talbere PA, Sermet A, Tenaillon A, Thuong M, Tulasne P, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B; French Famirea Group. Family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep;29(9):1498-504. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1904-y. Epub 2003 Jul 10.
- Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
- Heyland DK, Tranmer JE; Kingston General Hospital ICU Research Working Group. Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results. J Crit Care. 2001 Dec;16(4):142-9. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2001.30163.
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
- DI-I-0734-13
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .
Kliniske studier på Livskvalitet
-
Marlene FischerFullførtPostoperativ Quality of Recovery i Postanesthesia Care UnitTyskland
-
Anqing Municipal HospitalFullførtDexmedetomidin | Lidokain | Quality of Recovery (QoR-40), Preoperativ og PostoperativKina
-
University Hospital, GrenobleUkjentHealth Care Quality Management (ingen betingelse).Frankrike
-
Prisma Health-UpstateNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Clemson UniversityRekrutteringVelferdstandard | Standard of Care + CBT4CBT | Standard of Care + CBT4CBT + RCForente stater
-
Sorbonne UniversityAalborg UniversityRekrutteringPoint of Care UltralydFrankrike
-
Imperial College LondonFullført
-
Asociacion Española Primera en SaludIntensive Care Unit Pasteur HospitalFullførtPoint of Care UltralydUruguay
-
Aga Khan UniversityThe Hospital for Sick Children; Grand Challenges CanadaUkjentPoint of Care UltralydPakistan
-
Research Unit Of General Practice, CopenhagenUniversity of Copenhagen; Region Capital Denmark; The Copenhagen General... og andre samarbeidspartnereFullført
-
Nimble Science Ltd.University of Calgary; Lallemand Health SolutionsFullført
Kliniske studier på Training
-
Florida State UniversityRekruttering
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); National Institutes of Health...Fullført
-
University of MagdeburgFullførtHjerneskader, traumatiske | HemianopiTyskland
-
University of KentuckyNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) og andre samarbeidspartnereRekrutteringDiabetes mellitus, type 2Forente stater
-
Stony Brook UniversityNorthwell Health; Department of Health and Human Services; Rutgers UniversityFullført
-
University College, LondonFullført
-
Tufts UniversityFullført
-
Copka SonpashanHar ikke rekruttert ennå
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteProstate Cancer FoundationRekrutteringPROSTATAKREFT | Metastatisk prostatakreft | Metastatisk prostatakarsinomForente stater
-
Uşak UniversityFullførtLivskvalitet | Overholdelse av behandlingTyrkia