Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Use of Visual Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making in Chest Pain

12. april 2022 oppdatert av: National University Hospital, Singapore

The Use of a Visual Decision Aid for Shared Decision Making Among Patients With Chest Pain

This study aims to evaluate the use of the chest pain choice (CPC) decision aid as a tool to facilitate discussion between the patient and his/her attending physician with regard to subsequent management plans. Patients aged 21 years and above with low-risk chest pain, as determined by the HEART score (HEART score 0-3), will be included. The investigator's hypothesis is that incorporating the Chest Pain Choice visual aid in shared decision making can help to reduce unnecessary admissions for low risk chest pain to the observation ward, as well as increase patient knowledge with regards to their own condition.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Chest pain is a common presenting complaint in the Emergency Department (ED). Cardiac testing in low-risk patients poses unnecessary costs and resource utilisation, which may in part be due to clinicians adopting a very-low-risk threshold for discharge without testing.

The Chest Pain Choice (CPC) decision aid is a visual aid that was developed to facilitate shared decision-making between physicians and patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain, and has shown to be effective in increasing patient knowledge and decreasing the rate of admission to an observation unit for cardiac testing, among patients with chest pain who are at low risk for acute coronary syndromes. Shared decision making with the use of this visual aid has been shown in other centres to be associated with greater patient knowledge, greater patient involvement in decision making and less frequent admissions, with no increase in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) due to the intervention.

The visual aid includes a brief description of what tests have been done thus far to assess the patient's risk of MACE, a graphic representation of the risk as calculated based on the HEART score, as well as the evaluation options available. The visual aid has been modified from its original form for the local context in terms of viable options for further evaluation.

This study aims to assess if using a visual decision aid for shared decision making between physician and patient can safely help to decrease unnecessary admissions to the ED observation unit, as well as its impact on patient knowledge, satisfaction, as well as 30-day and 60-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

18

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Central
      • Singapore, Central, Singapore, 119074
        • Mui Teng Chua

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

21 år til 99 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 21 years and above
  • Have low risk chest pain as defined by the HEART score (0-3 points)
  • Be English-literate
  • Have an initial serum troponin that is less than the 99th centile of the normal reference population
  • Have an initial electrocardiogram that is not suggestive of cardiac ischaemia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a HEART score of 4 or more
  • Are not English-literate
  • Have an elevated initial serum troponin
  • Have an initial electrocardiogram that is suggestive of cardiac ischaemia (ST-segment depression or elevation, new onset left bundle brunch block, T-wave inversions, etc.)
  • Have known coronary artery disease
  • Have a prior plan for cardiac intervention or admission
  • Have barriers to outpatient follow-up
  • Are prisoners
  • Are pregnant
  • Are hearing or visually impaired, or are otherwise unable to use the clinical decision aid
  • Do not consent to participation in the study

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Intervention Arm
Patients in the intervention arm will receive the Chest Pain Choice visual aid prior to discussion with their primary physician regarding disposition.
The Chest Pain Choice (CPC) decision aid is a visual aid that was developed to facilitate shared decision-making between physicians and patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain. The visual aid includes a brief description of what tests have been done thus far to assess the patient's risk of MACE, a graphic representation of the risk as calculated based on the HEART score, as well as the evaluation options available. The visual aid has been modified from its original form for the local context in terms of viable options for further evaluation.
Ingen inngripen: Control Arm
Patients in the control arm will not receive the Chest Pain Choice visual aid and will receive standard care.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Admission to the Emergency Department Observation Unit
Tidsramme: Index visit
Admission to the Emergency Department Observation Unit during index emergency department visit
Index visit

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days
Tidsramme: 30 days after index visit
MACE is defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation.
30 days after index visit
Major Adverse Cardiac Events at 60 days
Tidsramme: 60 days after index visit
MACE is defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation.
60 days after index visit
Emergency Department Attendance at 30 days
Tidsramme: 30 days after index visit
Repeat attendance to the emergency department
30 days after index visit
Emergency Department Attendance at 60 days
Tidsramme: 60 days after index visit
Repeat attendance to the emergency department
60 days after index visit
Stress treadmill electrogram at 30 days
Tidsramme: 30 days after index visit
The presence of stress treadmill electrocardiogram at 30 days post index visit
30 days after index visit
Stress treadmill electrogram at 60 days
Tidsramme: 60 days after index visit
The presence of stress treadmill electrocardiogram at 60 days post index visit
60 days after index visit
Stress myocardial perfusion imaging at 30 days
Tidsramme: 30 days after index visit
The presence of stress myocardial perfusion imaging at 30 days post index visit
30 days after index visit
Stress myocardial perfusion imaging at 60 days
Tidsramme: 60 days after index visit
The presence of stress myocardial perfusion imaging at 60 days post index visit
60 days after index visit
Stress echocardiogram at 30 days
Tidsramme: 30 days after index visit
The presence of stress echocardiogram at 30 days post index visit
30 days after index visit
Stress echocardiogram at 60 days
Tidsramme: 60 days after index visit
The presence of stress echocardiogram at 60 days post index visit
60 days after index visit
Computed tomography of the coronary arteries (CTCA) at 30 days
Tidsramme: 30 days after index visit
The presence of computed tomography of the coronary arteries (CTCA) at 30 days post index visit
30 days after index visit
Computed tomography of the coronary arteries (CTCA) at 60 days
Tidsramme: 60 days after index visit
The presence of computed tomography of the coronary arteries (CTCA) at 60 days post index visit
60 days after index visit

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. mars 2019

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

3. september 2021

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

3. september 2021

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

26. august 2018

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

14. september 2018

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

17. september 2018

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

20. april 2022

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

12. april 2022

Sist bekreftet

1. august 2021

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Hjerteinfarkt

Kliniske studier på Chest Pain Choice visual aid

3
Abonnere