Chronic Pain and Vitamin D (DOVID)

December 9, 2013 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Chronic Pain and Vitamin D: a Randomized Pilot Study in General Practice

Non-systematized chronic musculoskeletal pains are a frequent reason for consulting in general practice. The possible causes are numerous and sometimes nonspecific. In some cases, the etiologic investigation of patients with non-systematized and chronic musculoskeletal pain can not highlight any organic cause. Several studies have shown a link between these symptoms and vitamin D deficiency, characterized by a blood level of 25 (OH) vitamin D < 20.8ng/ml. This deficit is easy to identify and to correct through proper vitamin D supplementation with few side effects. Nevertheless, it remains unknown and vitamin D deficiency is rarely considered as a possible etiology in patients with chronic pain. We hypothesize that vitamin D supplementation in patients with non-systematized musculoskeletal pain and deficient in vitamin D could improve painful symptoms. We aim to perform a double-blind randomized controlled trial, vitamin D versus placebo, to assess the pain improvement after vitamin D supplementation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lyon, France, 69424
        • Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche des Hospices Civils de Lyon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and men
  • Aged 18-50 years (included)
  • Consulting their general practitioner
  • With chronic and diffuse musculoskeletal pain, without known etiology, lasting for at least 3 months
  • With a 25(OH)vitamin D deficiency <20.8 ng/ml (52 nmol/l) at inclusion
  • Who signed the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Identifiable source of pain requiring an appropriate specific management
  • Disease or treatment that may interfere with the metabolism of vitamin D
  • Current or previous hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria, treatment with digitalics and patients with history of nephrolithiasis
  • Current treatment with vitamin D or at least one vitamin D vial taken over the previous 6 months
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • not affiliated to a social security system
  • Refusal or inability to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: vitamin D
Patients receiving 3 doses of vitamin D (cholecalciferol)
Drug: vitamin D (cholecalciferol)
Patients from the vitamin D arm will receive an orally supplementation of 600 000 UI cholecalciferol in 3 doses: 200 000 UI at baseline (day 1), 200 000 UI on day 15 and 200 000 UI on day 30. Cholecalciferol will be presented in blisters, in a non-differentiable form in appearance and taste from placebo, either for the patient or the doctor
EXPERIMENTAL: Placebo
Patients receiving 3 doses of placebo according to the same schedule as experimental arm
Drug: Placebo, similar in appearance and taste to cholecalciferol
Patients from the placebo arm will receive 3 doses of placebo to be taken orally: one at baseline (day 1), one on day 15, one on day 30. Placebo will be presented in blisters in a non-differentiable form in appearance and taste from cholecalciferol either for the patient or the doctor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients in the two groups who reported a decrease in the overall pain after 3 months of treatment with vitamin D versus placebo.
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion
item 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory will be measured in each patient to assess the overall pain score at inclusion and after 3 month of treatment with vitamin D or placebo
3 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
: Proportion of patients in both groups reporting an evolution of the minimum and the maximum of intensity of pain
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion
item 3 and 4 of the Brief Pain Inventory will be measured in each patient to assess the minimum and the maximum pain scores at inclusion, after 45 days and after 3 months of treatment with vitamin D or placebo
3 months after inclusion
Proportion of patients in both groups reporting a decrease in the impact of pain on daily activities
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion
item 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory will be measured in each patient to assess the score of the impact of pain on daily activities at inclusion, after 45 days and after 3 months of treatment with vitamin D or placebo
3 months after inclusion
Proportion of patients reporting a decrease in the consumption of analgesic drugs
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion
Patients of both groups will be asked at inclusion, after 45 days and after 3 months, if they took analgesic drugs: name, class and dose of each treatment will be registered in a standardized questionnaire
3 months after inclusion
Proportion of patients in both groups reporting a decrease in the consumption of care (consultations and work stoppages)
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion
Patients of both groups will be asked at inclusion, after 45 days and after 3 months, if they consulted any health care professional : which health care professional, how many time, the reason for consultation and work stoppages will be registered in a standardized questionnaire
3 months after inclusion
Proportion of patients in both groups reporting an improvement in quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion
Quality of life will be measured in patients of both groups by the SF-36 questionnaire, at inclusion and after 90 days.
3 months after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Marie SCHOTT, Pr, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche des Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 10, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2013-802

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Supplementation

Clinical Trials on vitamin D (cholecalciferol)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings