Comparison of Absorption of Vitamin D in Cystic Fibrosis

November 19, 2015 updated by: Vin Tangpricha, MD, PH.D, Emory University

Vehicles for the Absorption of Vitamin D in Cystic Fibrosis: Comparison of Powder vs Oil

The investigators predict that a powder pill form of vitamin D will be more effectively absorbed than an oil form of vitamin D in people diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to see how well two different forms of vitamin D work in Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Patients with Cystic Fibrosis have a hard time absorbing certain foods and often have low vitamin D levels. Studies show that vitamin D may help fight infections common in Cystic Fibrosis. The investigators would like to see if a powder pill form of vitamin D will work better than a pill mixed with oil. Each person will randomly receive either a powder pill or an oil based pill. Blood will be tested while during a 3-4 day hospital stay. The investigators plan to enroll no more than 24 patients with CF from Emory University Hospital for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult CF patients (age >18 years
  • Able to tolerate oral medication
  • Expected to survive the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to obtain or declined informed consent from the subject and/or legally authorized representative
  • History of disorders associated with hypercalcemia
  • Current hypercalcemia (albumin-corrected serum calcium >10.8 mg/dL or ionized calcium >5.2 mg/dL)
  • Chronic kidney disease worse than stage III (<60 ml/min), 7) Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)% predicted <20%
  • Current significant hepatic dysfunction total bilirubin > 2.5 mg/dL with direct bilirubin > 1.0 mg/dL
  • Current use of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive drugs
  • History of AIDS or illicit drug abuse
  • too ill to participate in study based on investigator's or study team's opinion
  • current enrollment in another intervention trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 100,000 IU D-50 powder
Vitamin D oil vs powder. 100,000 IU powder form of vitamin D, assessment of D3 absorption. One Dose of vitamin D powder format administered. Absorption rate monitored over 72 hour period
Patients will be randomly assigned to a powder supplement of 100,000 IU vitamin D3. Randomization will be in blocks of 4 (meaning for every 4 subjects there will be 2 vitamin D and 2 placebo treated patients). Blood will be drawn by IV catheter at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after vitamin D3 dosing
Other Names:
  • D3-50 Cholecalciferol
Active Comparator: 100,000 IU Maximum D3 in oil
Vitamin D oil vs powder. One Dose of 100,000 IU vitamin D oil format administered. Absorption rate monitored over 72 hour period
Patients will be randomly assigned to an oil based supplement of 100,000 IU vitamin D3. Randomization will be in blocks of 4 (meaning for every 4 subjects there will be 2 vitamin D and 2 placebo treated patients). Blood will be drawn by IV catheter at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after vitamin D3 dosing
Other Names:
  • Maximum D3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Absorption of vitamin D3 to blood
Time Frame: 72 hours
rates of absorption of D3 will be compared for either an oil based or powder form pill OVER 72 HOURS.
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vin Tangpricha, MD PhD, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Powder

3
Subscribe