A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fenestrated Cup Forceps Versus Fenestrated Alligator Forceps for Performing Transbronchial Lung Biopsy in Patients With Sarcoidosis

January 2, 2017 updated by: Ritesh Agarwal, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease that results from granulomatous inflammation that involves multiple body organs. The diagnosis requires the presence of compatible clinicoradiological features along with histologic evidence that demonstrates non-caseating.1 Mediastinal lymph nodes and the lung parenchyma are the most commonly involved structures in sarcoidosis that can be sampled by, performing various bronchoscopic techniques. In a recent study the use of alligator forceps had a better yield in comparison to cup forceps. The investigators hypothesize that use of fenestrated alligator forceps in comparison to fenestrated cup forceps will yield larger samples, thereby improving the diagnostic yield and reducing the number of biopsy samples irrespective of the stage of sarcoidosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder characterized by granulomatous inflammation involving various body organs. The diagnosis is based on presence of fulfillment of compatible clinicoradiological features and histologic evidence of non-caseating granuloma after exclusion of other known causes for granulomatous inflammation.1 As the lung and mediastinal lymph nodes are the most commonly involved structures in sarcoidosis, performing various bronchoscopic techniques like endobronchial biopsy (EBB), transbronchial biopsy (TBLB) and transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) are needed for tissue sampling. The diagnostic yield of TBLB in sarcoidosis in stage I and II varies from 31%2 to 69.6%.3 Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is performed with flexible bronchoscopy under the effect of local anesthesia and is the most commonly used bronchoscopic procedure to diagnose a wide array of lung diseases. It is performed as an outpatient procedure and is associated with minimal complications such as bleeding, pneumothorax and others.4 The procedure can be performed either as a blindly or under fluoroscopic guidance. The yield of TBLB varies depending upon the extent of disease, size of tissue, number of alveoli, number of biopsies, whether the sample floats or not and the size of forceps.5-12 The diagnostic yield of TBLB in sarcoidosis depends on the radiological stage and varies from 50-65% in stage I to 80 to 85% in stage II.13-15 The diagnostic yield also depends on the number of biopsy specimens (ten in stage I and 4-6 in stage II and III).9,10 In a recent study comprising of 44 patients with 176 samples, the use of alligator forceps yielded larger samples with lesser incidence of complications (major bleeding, alligator v/s cup forceps respectively, 1% v/s 5.7% and pneumothorax, 4.5 %v/s 9.1%). The investigators hypothesize that use of fenestrated alligator forceps in comparison to fenestrated cup forceps will yield larger samples, thereby improving the diagnostic yield and reducing the number of biopsy samples irrespective of the stage of sarcoidosis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Bronchoscopy suite, PGIMER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 90 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with a clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis undergoing flexible bronchoscopy
  2. age group of 12 to 90 years;
  3. hemodynamically stable (systolic BP > 100 mm Hg without the need of vasopressors); and
  4. ability to provide informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. hemoglobin less than 8 gm/dL;
  2. platelet count of less than 80000;
  3. bleeding diathesis;
  4. prothrombin time or activated partial thrombin time prolongation of more than 6 seconds when compared to control;
  5. baseline room air saturation less than 90%;
  6. pregnancy; and,
  7. failure to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cup forceps
4 biopsies (transbronchial lung biopsy) with Cup forceps
Device: Cup forceps
In patients with sarcoidosis, flexible bronchoscopy and transbronchial lung biopsy using cup forceps
Active Comparator: Alligator forceps
4 biopsies (transbronchial lung biopsy) with Alligator forceps
Device: Alligator forceps
In patients with sarcoidosis, flexible bronchoscopy and transbronchial lung biopsy using alligator forceps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of fenestrated alligator versus fenestrated cup forceps for transbronchial lung biopsy (Size of the tissue)
Time Frame: 12 months
Size of tissue: Size of the tissue will be visually assessed as small if it does not fill the cup, medium if it fills the cup and large if comes out of the cup
12 months
Diagnostic yield of fenestrated alligator versus fenestrated cup forceps for transbronchial lung biopsy (Size of the tissue)
Time Frame: 12 months
Size of tissue in millimeters during histopathology
12 months
Diagnostic yield of fenestrated alligator versus fenestrated cup forceps for transbronchial lung biopsy (histopathology)
Time Frame: 12 months
Histopathology examination and findings
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication (Occurrence of bleeding)
Time Frame: 12 months
Occurrence of bleeding
12 months
Complication (Occurrence of pneumothorax)
Time Frame: 12 months
Occurrence of pneumothorax
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ritesh Agarwal, MD, DM, PGIMER, Chandigarh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 2, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0810

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoidosis

Clinical Trials on Cup forceps

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings