Web App Technology for Boys and Parents: Improving HPV Vaccine Uptake

February 2, 2023 updated by: Klein Buendel, Inc.
The uptake of vaccines for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in the U.S. is far below recommended levels, particularly for adolescent boys and especially among minority families. Proposed here is a mobile web application ("mobile web app") for personal computers, smart phones, and tablet computers that will accurately inform parents and adolescent boys about the HPV vaccination and address unique concerns about its safety and effectiveness for boys. The BoyVac mobile web app will be evaluated for its ability to improve vaccine outcomes in a randomized efficacy trial with parents and adolescent boys aged 11-13 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The President's Cancer Advisory Board and the Centers for Disease Control have called for renewed efforts in promoting vaccination for Human Papillomavirus (HPV), including vaccination for adolescent boys, because the uptake of this new vaccine remains alarmingly low. Currently, less than 15% of adolescent boys have received the HPV vaccine; thus, most of this population remains at risk for oropharyngeal, anal, and penile cancers. Many parents remain unconvinced of the safety and effectiveness of HPV vaccines, so effective and accessible messaging to improve decision-making on this vaccine is needed. Parents of adolescent boys also have different concerns about HPV vaccination than for adolescent girls, creating a need for unique health communication interventions to promote vaccine uptake among boys. Interventions also need to address the unique challenges of minority populations and populations for whom English is not the first language. A novel digital intervention will be produced and evaluated for its ability to improve HPV vaccine outcomes. Specifically, a mobile responsive web application ("mobile web app") will be created that performs similar to a mobile app but runs on a variety of computing platforms from personal desktop and laptop computers to the latest smart phones and tablet computers. Mobile web app content will be targeted to parents and adolescent boys aged 11-13 years. The specific aims are to: 1) carefully and systematically develop a mobile web app (BoyVac) for smart phones, tablet computers, and personal computers that will utilize Diffusion of Innovations principles to provide targeted information concerning HPV vaccine adoption to adolescent males and their parents, particularly minority adolescents and parents; 2) implement a comprehensive and rigorous test of the impact of the BoyVac mobile web app intervention on HPV vaccine adoption outcomes via a randomized efficacy trial (BoyVac v. usual and customary care); and 3) examine the dose-response relationships between mobile web app usage and vaccine outcomes within a components analysis. A group-randomized pretest-posttest controlled design will be implemented, recruiting 1800 pairs of parents and adolescent boys from 30 pediatric clinics (n=60 parents and boys per clinic). Parents will be surveyed at baseline, a 3-month follow-up, and a 9-month follow-up and records HPV vaccination adoption for the boys will be obtained from the clinics' medical records at the 9-month follow-up. Analyses will test the hypotheses that 1) more 11-13 year old boys in the intervention group (BoyVac mobile web app) will adopt the HPV vaccine than boys in the usual and customary care comparison group and 2) adoption of HPV vaccine will be mediated by improvements in theoretical mediators among parents in the intervention compared to the usual and customary care comparison group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
432

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401
        • Klein Buendel, Inc.
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2915
        • Indiana University
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131-0001
        • University of New Mexico

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adolescent boys:

  1. being male
  2. being 11-13 years old
  3. being a patient at a participating University of New Mexico (UNM) Hospital's Envision pediatric practice
  4. parental consent for testing, and
  5. child assent for testing

Parents/Guardians:

  1. being a parent/guardian of an eligible and participating 11-13 year old boy
  2. demonstrated ability to comprehend study requirements, and
  3. providing informed consent for oneself and assent for their youth's participation

Exclusion Criteria:

Adolescent boys:

  1. another immediate family member is participating in the project (i.e., a sibling)
  2. the participant has already received any or all doses for the HPV vaccine, or
  3. the participant refuses to assent.

Parents/Guardians:

  1. under the age of 18, or
  2. another immediate family member is participating in the project (i.e., another parent).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Web App Intervention Group
The BoyVac mobile web app will be evaluated in a pair-matched group-randomized pretest-posttest controlled design. In Year 2, 30 clinics in New Mexico will be pair-matched and one member of each pair will be randomized to the intervention (mobile web app) or a usual and customary (UC) HPV vaccine adoption procedures comparison group. Clinics will be paired based on similarities in patient demographic (ethnicity and % Medicaid patients) and location (urban and rural).
Behavioral: Web App Intervention Group
All baseline and follow-up data collection will be conducted via online surveys and a customized web portal and include parent self-reports and clinic records of vaccination of boys
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Usual Customary Care Group
Currently in pediatric clinics in New Mexico, the HPV vaccines are offered to parents and adolescents as part of annual well-child checkups. Typically for boys aged 11-13, parents initiate this checkup as part of a back-to-school activity. As part of the well-child checkup, clinic staff (physician, physician assistant and/or nurse) talk with parents and adolescents about the recommendation that their sons or daughters receive the HPV vaccination. Well-child pediatric visits to promote good health and development are recommended for all children from infancy through adolescence by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Behavioral: Usual Customary Care Group
Participants randomized to the usual and customary care (UC) group will receive a website with a pamphlet on HPV vaccination from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Portable Document Format (PDF) format.
Other Names:
  • UC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaccine Initiation
Time Frame: 1 Month
Vaccine initiation - whether or not each boy received the HPV vaccine and the date of administration. Number of participants who received at least 1 dose.
1 Month
Vaccine Adherence
Time Frame: 2 Months
Vaccine Adherence - whether participants adhered to the three-dose course of the HPV vaccination or not. 2nd dose and date received. Number of participants who received at least 2 doses.
2 Months
Vaccine Adherence
Time Frame: 4 months
Vaccine Adherence - whether participants adhered to the three-dose course of the HPV vaccination or not. 3rd dose and date received. Number of participants who received the 3 doses.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attitudes towards vaccination in general
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine attitudes towards vaccinations in general
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Attitudes towards the HPV vaccine
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine attitudes towards the HPV vaccine
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Perception of risk due to HPV and not being vaccinated
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine the perception of risk due to HPV and not being vaccinated.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Perception of negative and positive consequences associated with HPV vaccination
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine the perception of negative and positive consequences associated with HPV vaccination.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Self-efficacy to make informed decisions about HPV vaccination
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine the self-efficacy to make informed decisions about HPV vaccination
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
HPV knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine the participant's knowledge about HPV
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Spousal support and social normative and cultural perceptions of receiving the HPV vaccination
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up
Quantitative research in the form of an online survey will be conducted to examine the spousal support and social normative and cultural perceptions of receiving the HPV vaccination.
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Klein Buendel, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Indiana University
University of New Mexico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 31, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0310
  • 1R01CA210125-01A1 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HPV

Clinical Trials on Web App Intervention Group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings