Pelviperineal Physiotherapy in Postpartum (PT-POSTPARTO)

August 21, 2026 updated by: Maria Torres Lacomba, University of Alcala

Effectiveness of the Perineal Physiotherapy in the Prevention and Treatment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Postpartum

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of pelviperineal physiotherapy hypopressive exercise, and pelvic health education for the prevention and treatment of postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after vaginal delivery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Design: Randomized, controlled and single blinded clinical trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these groups: Experimental group: pelviperineal physical therapy plus pelvic health education and training in the Knack manoeuvre; Experimental group II: hypopressive exercises plus pelvic health education and training in the Knack manoeuvre; Control group: pelvic health education, training in the Knack manoeuvre, and general recommendations for pelvic floor muscle exercises at home. In the 3 groups several physical therapy assessments will be undertaken: 1st before intervention, 2nd immediately after completing intervention; 3th, 4th, 5th and 6th after 3, 6 and12 months. Study subjects: Postnatal women (6 and 8 weeks after vaginal delivery), primiparous, whose vaginal delivery has occurred in the "PrÍncipe de Asturias" Hospital, which have not been already treated for pelvic floor dysfunction, and after reading, understanding and freely signing an informed consent form. Sample size: The sample size was calculated a priori using the PFDI-20 as the primary outcome. Based on a clinically meaningful between-group difference of 20 points and an SD of change of 31.2 points, 55 participants per group were required. A total of 165 participants were randomized (55 per group). Data analysis: A descriptive analysis will be performed for all variables. Intervention effects will be assessed using linear mixed-effects models for change from baseline, including group, time, and group-by-time interaction as fixed effects, with adjustment for the centered baseline value of the outcome and a participant-specific random intercept. A two-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
165

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Madrid
      • Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • University of Alcalá. FPSM research group. HUPA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postnatal women (6 and 8 weeks after vaginal delivery)
  • Primiparous
  • Whose vaginal delivery has occurred in the "Príncipe de Asturias" Hospital
  • Women have not been already treated for pelvic floor dysfunction
  • Women reading, understanding and freely signing an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Postnatal women with medical diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) prior to pregnancy and delivery
  • Women with a history of conservative treatment or PFD surgery
  • Women with concomitant or systemic disease that may affect the treatment (neurological, gynecological, urological or connective tissue), or with active or recurrent urinary infection without treatment at the time of the intervention proposed in this study, or hematuria.
  • Women with perineal pain preventing vaginal dynamometry.
  • Postnatal women with cognitive impairment or insufficient Spanish-language proficiency preventing adequate understanding of study procedures.
  • Women with severe maternal complications or serious neonatal conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pelviperineal physiotherapy (PP) group
An individualised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) programme will be applied. Participants will performed PFM exercises in the way proposed by the PERFECT scheme. Biofeedback exercises will be also performed in lithotomy position. If the evolution of the women will allow it, the last two treatment biofeedback sessions will be conducted in standing position, to train PFM in more challenging and functional situation. Active intravaginal electrical stimulation will also be applied when PFM strength was <3 on the Modified Oxford Scale. Participants also received pelvic health education, standardised instruction in the Knack manoeuvre, and an individualised home exercise programme. Educational strategy will also be applied. The intervention will last 8 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Each session will last 60 minutes.
Other: PFM training
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
Other Names:
  • Pelvic floor muscle training
Other: HE
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
Other Names:
  • Hypopressive exercises
Behavioral: Educational strategy
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
Experimental: Hypopressive exercices (HE) group

Women will be instructed in thirty-three Hypopressives exercises (HE) described by the developer of the Hypopressive Abdominal Gymnastics, Dr. Caufriez plus pelvic health education, standardised instruction in the Knack manoeuvre, and individualised home practice were also provided.

The intervention will last 8 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Each session will last 60 minutes.
Other: HE
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
Other Names:
  • Hypopressive exercises
Behavioral: Educational strategy
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
Active Comparator: Control group
The educational strategy will consist of instruction of printed materials and dimensional anatomical models about the anatomy of the pelvic floor and the physiology of the pelvic organs. It will be recommended to avoid risk factors, such as gaining weight, weight lifting, high impact sports, constipation, smoking, or drinking too much caffeine. They will also instruct in toilet habits, standardised instruction in the Knack manoeuvre, and general recommendations for PFM exercise at home. No supervised or individualised PFMT or hypopressive exercise was provided. The intervention will last 8 weeks, 1 session per week. Each session will last 50 minutes.
Behavioral: Educational strategy
See information included in arm/group descriptions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptoms and quality of life
Time Frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be assessed by PFDI-20 Spanish version that is both a symptom inventory and a measure of the degree of bother and distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms. The PFDI-20 includes 20 questions and 3 scales. Each of the 3 scales is scored from 0 (least distress) to 100 (greatest distress). The sum of the scores of these 3 scales serves as the overall summary score of the PFDI-20 and ranges from 0 - 300 and the higher the score, the worse quality of life. The 3 scales include questions taken from the following widely used outcome measures: Urinary Distress Inventory - 6 questions, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory - 6 questions, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory - 8 questions collecting data about UI, POP and colorectal and anal symptoms.
5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in life impact of pelvic floor dysfunction
Time Frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be assessed by the PFIQ-7 Spanish version. The PFIQ-7 consists of 3 scales of 7 questions each taken from the Urinary Impact Questionnaire, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire, and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire. The 3 scales are scored from 0 (least impact) to 100 (greatest impact) and an overall summary score (0 to 300).
5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
Pelvic floor muscle contraction and strenght
Time Frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
Vaginal palpation will qualify PFM contraction and strength. using the Modified Oxford Score ranging from 0 to 5, according to the muscles contraction and strength.
5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
Changes in sexual function
Time Frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be assessed using the Spanish version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI consists of 19 items assessing six domains of female sexual function: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain, with higher scores indicating better sexual function.
5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
Change in pelvic floor muscle strength and tone
Time Frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be measured with dynamometry (gr)
5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alcala

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21/2013
  • PI17/01449 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), SPAIN)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings