A Phase 2 Pilot Study of Apixaban for the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Advanced (Metastatic) Cancer

August 11, 2016 updated by: Bristol-Myers Squibb

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Apixaban for the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Advanced Cancer: A Phase 2 Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to learn whether apixaban is well-tolerated and acceptable as anticoagulant therapy, when administered to patients with advanced or metastatic cancer and at increased risk for venous thromboembolic events. Demonstration of a favorable benefit:risk profile could lead to significant reduction in this serious and sometimes fatal complication of ongoing cancer and its treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8V 2C5
        • Local Institution
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6
        • Local Institution
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Local Institution
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Local Institution
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Local Institution
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4
        • Local Institution
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • Arizona Cancer Center
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Univ. Of Southern Calif. /Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Inst
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89135
        • Nevada Cancer Institute
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University Of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Ctr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of either first- or second-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic lung, breast, gastrointestinal, bladder, ovarian, or prostate cancer or myeloma, selected lymphomas, or cancer of unknown origin
  • Able to begin study medication ≤6 weeks of starting either first- or second-line chemotherapy.
  • Expected course of chemotherapy must have been ≥ 90 days after the start of chemotherapy
  • Per Protocol Amendment 5, patients receiving bevacizumab were eligible to participate, provided that bevacizumab was used for indications approved by local country law

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding
  • History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
  • Active bleeding or at high risk of bleeding
  • Metastatic brain cancer
  • Familial bleeding diathesis
  • Serious hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, transfusion, or surgical intervention within 4 weeks of study entry
  • Expected survival <6 months or an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥3.
  • Candidates for bone marrow transplantation within the 12-week treatment period or 30-day follow-up period
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >200 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110 mm Hg
  • Coagulopathy (international normalized ratio >1.5 or platelet count <100*10^9/L) if not yet receiving chemotherapy or <50*10^9/L if receiving chemotherapy). Platelet count must have been >100*10^9/L before starting study medication
  • One or more of the following: alanine aminotransferase >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin >2*ULN, or calculated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 1: Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets once daily
Oral tablets administered once daily
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 1: Apixaban, 5 mg
Participants received apixaban as tablet, 5 mg, once daily
Oral tablets administered once daily in 5-, 10-, or 20-mg dose
Other Names:
  • BMS-562247
Active Comparator: Cohort 1: Apixaban, 10 mg
Participants received apixaban as tablet, 10 mg, once daily
Oral tablets administered once daily in 5-, 10-, or 20-mg dose
Other Names:
  • BMS-562247
Active Comparator: Cohort 1: Apixaban, 20 mg
Participants received apixaban as tablet, 20 mg, once daily
Oral tablets administered once daily in 5-, 10-, or 20-mg dose
Other Names:
  • BMS-562247
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 2: Placebo
Participants in this cohort were admitted to the trial following the addition of a protocol amendment (Amendment 5), which removed the prohibition of inclusion of patients receiving chemotherapy with concomitant antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab. Patients received placebo once daily.
Oral tablets administered once daily
Active Comparator: Cohort 2: Apixaban, 5 mg
Participants in this cohort were admitted to the trial following the addition of a protocol amendment (Amendment 5), which removed the prohibition of inclusion of patients receiving chemotherapy with concomitant antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab. Patients received apixaban as tablet, 5 mg, once daily.
Oral tablets administered once daily in 5-, 10-, or 20-mg dose
Other Names:
  • BMS-562247

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Composite of Confirmed Major Bleeding and Clinically Relevant Nonmajor (CRNM) Bleeding
Time Frame: From first dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Major bleeding was defined as clinically overt bleeding accompanied by 1 or more of the following:

  • A decrease in hemoglobin of 20 g/L or more or
  • Required transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood, or
  • Occurred in a critical site
  • Contributed to death.

CRNM bleeding was defined as bleeding that did not meet the criteria for major bleeding but that, in routine clinical practice, would be considered relevant and not trivial by a patient and physician. Such bleeding satisfied a priori criteria defined by the ICAC, including:

  • Skin hematoma
  • Epistaxis that lasted for longer than 5 minutes, was repetitive, or led to an intervention
  • Hematuria that was macroscopic and either spontaneous or lasted for longer than 24 hours after instrumentation of the urogenital tract
  • Any other bleeding type that was considered to have clinical consequences.
From first dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Composite of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and All-cause Death
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

VTE includes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for PE:

  • Constant intraluminal filling defects in 2 or more views on pulmonary angiography
  • Sudden contrast cutoff of 1 or more vessels more than 2.5 mm in diameter on a pulmonary angiogram
  • A high probability VQ lung scan showing 1 or more segmental perfusion defects with corresponding normal ventilation (mismatch defect)
  • An abnormal VQ lung scan with satisfaction of either criterion 1 or 2
  • Abnormal spiral computed tomography scan showing thrombus in pulmonary vessels.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Nonfatal Pulmonary Embolism (PE), and All-cause Death
Time Frame: First dose to 30 days following last dose of study drug

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments (popliteal vein or higher) of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for PE:

  • Constant intraluminal filling defects in 2 or more views on pulmonary angiography
  • Sudden contrast cutoff of 1 or more vessels more than 2.5 mm in diameter on a pulmonary angiogram
  • A high probability VQ lung scan showing 1 or more segmental perfusion defects with corresponding normal ventilation (mismatch defect)
  • An abnormal VQ lung scan (nonhigh probability) with satisfaction of either criterion 1 or 2
  • Abnormal spiral computed tomography scan showing thrombus in pulmonary vessels.
First dose to 30 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Composite of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related Death
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

VTE includes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for PE:

  • Constant intraluminal filling defects in 2 or more views on pulmonary angiography
  • Sudden contrast cutoff of 1 or more vessels more than 2.5 mm in diameter on a pulmonary angiogram
  • A high probability VQ lung scan showing 1 or more segmental perfusion defects with corresponding normal ventilation (mismatch defect)
  • An abnormal VQ lung scan with satisfaction of either criterion 1 or 2
  • Abnormal spiral computed tomography scan showing thrombus in pulmonary vessels.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Composite of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Nonfatal Pulmonary Embolism (PE), and Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)-Related Death
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

VTE includes symptomatic DVT and PE. Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for PE:

  • Constant intraluminal filling defects in 2 or more views on pulmonary angiography
  • Sudden contrast cutoff of 1 or more vessels more than 2.5 mm in diameter on a pulmonary angiogram
  • A high probability VQ lung scan showing 1 or more segmental perfusion defects with corresponding normal ventilation (mismatch defect)
  • An abnormal VQ lung scan with satisfaction of either criterion 1 or 2
  • Abnormal spiral computed tomography scan showing thrombus in pulmonary vessels.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With All-Cause Death
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Embolism (Fatal or Nonfatal)
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for PE:

  • Constant intraluminal filling defects in 2 or more views on pulmonary angiography
  • Sudden contrast cutoff of 1 or more vessels of greater than 2.5 mm in diameter on a pulmonary angiogram
  • A high probability VQ lung scan showing 1 or more segmental perfusion defects with corresponding normal ventilation (mismatch defect)
  • An abnormal VQ lung scan with satisfaction of either criterion 1 or 2
  • Abnormal spiral computed tomography scan showing thrombus in pulmonary vessels.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Nonfatal Pulmonary Embolism
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for PE:

  • Constant intraluminal filling defects in 2 or more views on pulmonary angiography
  • Sudden contrast cutoff of 1 or more vessels more than 2.5 mm in diameter on a pulmonary angiogram
  • A high probability VQ lung scan showing 1 or more segmental perfusion defects with corresponding normal ventilation (mismatch defect)
  • An abnormal VQ lung scan with satisfaction of either criterion 1 or 2
  • Abnormal spiral computed tomography scan showing thrombus in pulmonary vessels.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Deep Vein Thrombosis
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants With Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Any 1 of the following was considered diagnostic for DVT:

  • New or previously undocumented noncompressibility of 1 or more proximal venous segments of the legs on CUS
  • Constant intraluminal filling defects on 2 or more views on contrast venography in 1 or more venous segments in the legs or pelvis or involving the inferior vena cava.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
Number of Participants Who Died and With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Bleeding AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
Time Frame: First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
First dose to 2 days following last dose of study drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

May 3, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe