Xylitol Versus Saline in Chronic Sinusitis

July 31, 2018 updated by: Lakshmi Durairaj, University of Iowa

Randomized Controlled Trial of Xylitol Versus Saline Rinse For Chronic Sinusitis

Is a xylitol nasal rinse better or worse than saline on patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this pilot study, the investigators plan to compare the efficacy of twice daily xylitol nasal rinse with saline rinse which is the current standard, on outcomes such as quality of life and exacerbations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

We now have two arms to this study.

Group I: Immunocompetent subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 56 Adult subjects (18 or older) presenting to the ENT(ears, nose, throat) clinics who meet the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Definition of CRS: Presence of at least 2 of the following 4 signs/symptoms for 12 weeks or longer despite medical management:

    • Anterior and/or posterior mucopurulent drainage
    • Nasal obstruction
    • Facial pain, pressure, and/or fullness
    • Decreased sense of smell
  • In addition, objective evidence of sinus mucosal disease must be demonstrated on sinus CT imaging or direct endoscopic examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Fungal sinusitis
  • Immunocompromised status (use of long term oral steroids (> 30 days), AIDS, active malignancy or chemotherapy)
  • Known Ciliary disorders
  • Sinonasal tumors
  • Pregnancy

Group 2: CRS with antibody deficiency

  • 56 Adult subjects (18 or older) presenting to the Allergy clinic who meet the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Definition of CRS: Presence of at least 2 of the following 4 signs/symptoms for 12 weeks or longer despite medical management:

    • Anterior and/or posterior mucopurulent drainage
    • Nasal obstruction
    • Facial pain, pressure, and/or fullness
    • Decreased sense of smell
  • In addition, objective evidence of sinus mucosal disease must be demonstrated on sinus CT imaging or direct endoscopic examination.

Exclusion criteria:

Cystic Fibrosis Sinonasal tumors Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Xylitol
isotonic xylitol for sinus rinse
5% solution for sinus rinse
Active Comparator: Saline
saline for sinus rinse
saline for sinus rinse
Other Names:
  • Salt solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNOT-20 Scores at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Sinonasal outcome test is a 20 item quality of life questionnaire: Min-Max score range 0-100 The SNOT score for each patient was defined as the mean value of the response to the 20 items. The questionnaire is divided into 4 subsets, symptoms related to nose, symptoms of ear and face, sleep quality and psychological issues.

Symptoms arereported on 100 mm visual analog scales (VASs) where 0 mm represents no symptoms and 100 mm represent "as troublesome as possible". The symptom severity is considered mild between 0 and 30, moderate from 30 to 70 and severe from 70- 100.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Number of Antibiotic Courses During the Study Period
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mean Number of antibiotic courses for infection during the study period
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lakshmi Durairaj, M.D., University of Iowa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Sinusitis

Clinical Trials on Xylitol

3
Subscribe