Trial of Minocycline to Treat Children With Fragile X Syndrome

May 25, 2017 updated by: University of California, Davis

Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Cross Over Trial of Minocycline in Children With Fragile X Syndrome

This is a single center study at the UC Davis MIND Institute in patients age 3.5-16 years of age with fragile X syndrome (FXS), funded by a National Fragile X Foundation Grant. It is a controlled trial of minocycline, an antibiotic commonly used in children for infection or for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. We are investigating its use in FXS because it lowers matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) levels, which are high in FXS, and it also strengthens brain connections in the animal models of FXS. We hypothesize that minocycline will likely be helpful for language, behavior and/or cognition in fragile X patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a single center study at the UC Davis MIND Institute in patients age 3.5-16 years of age with fragile X syndrome (FXS), funded by a National Fragile X Foundation Grant. It is a controlled trial of minocycline, an antibiotic commonly used in children for infection or for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. We are investigating its use in FXS because it lowers matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) levels, which are high in FXS, and it also strengthens brain connections in the animal models of FXS. We hypothesize that minocycline will likely be helpful for language, behavior and/or cognition in fragile X patients.

The aim of this study is to carry out a double-blind placebo controlled trial of minocycline treatment in children with FXS who are 3.5 to 16 years of age. At baseline, we will assess behavior and perceptual and cognitive development. After the children have been treated for 3 months with either minocycline or placebo, they undergo the same baseline testing. They will then cross over and be treated for a second 3 months. We will carry out testing again at the end of the second 3 month period. We will also assess the side effects of minocycline treatment throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • M.I.N.D. Institute at University of California at Davis Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 16 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have fragile X syndrome with molecular documentation
  • Current pharmacological treatment regimen has been stable for at least 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who plan to initiate or change pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic interventions during the course of the study
  • subjects who are unable to take oral medication
  • subjects who have been on minocycline previously
  • subjects who are allergic to minocycline or tetracyclines
  • subjects who are pregnant
  • subjects with history of lupus or hepatic dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo pill
All patients will be on placebo for 3 months in this crossover study.
Placebo will be given daily for 3 months.
EXPERIMENTAL: Minocycline
All patients will be on minocycline for 3 months in this crossover trial.
Minocycline hydrochloride dosed orally once a day for 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: 3 months (post first treatment) and 6 months (post second treatment)
The CGI-I utilizes history from primary caregivers and incorporates it into a seven step clinical rating for follow up throughout treatment, from 1 "very much improved" to 7 "very much worse". Lower scores indicate more improvement. Scores were obtained post treatments. Scores from when the patients were on minocycline either first or second were combined and averaged to determine a least squares mean and placebo scores were obtained in the same manner.
3 months (post first treatment) and 6 months (post second treatment)
Visual Analogue Scale- Behavior 1
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the first behavior that the caregivers noted, out of three.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale- Behaviors 2
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the second behavior that the caregivers noted, out of three.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Expressive Vocabulary Test-2
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
The EVT-2 standard score assesses language development through a participant's one word synonym response to visual stimuli. Standard scores range from 20-160. A standard score of 100 is average, with a 15 point standard deviation. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II)Adaptive Behavior Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
The VABS-II Adaptive Behavior Composite Score was used to assess adaptive skills. An Adaptive Behavior Composite Score may range from 20-160 with an average of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores show improvement.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community Edition (ABC-C)Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
The ABC-C composite scores were used to quantify the severity of a patient's behaviors. A composite score consists of subscale scores including Irritability and Agitation, Lethargy and Social Withdrawal, Stereotypic Behavior, Hyperactivity and Noncompliance, and Inappropriate Speech. The composite score may range from 0-174. Lower scores indicate improvement.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Visual Analogue Scale Behavior 3- VAS3
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the third behavior that caregivers noted, out of three.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
VAS Categorized by Behavior: Aggression/ ADHD
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with aggression or ADHD behaviors.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
VAS Categorized by Behavior:Anxiety/ Mood
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with anxiety or mood related behaviors.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
VAS Categorized by Behavior:Language/ Cognition
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with language or cognitive symptoms.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
VAS Categorized by Behavior: Other
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with other behaviors that were not able to be categorized.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Randi J Hagerman, MD, M.I.N.D. Institute at University of California at Davis, Sacramento CA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fragile X Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe