- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01418378
Sigma CR150 Versus Sigma CR Knee RCT
A Double-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Performance of the Sigma® CR150 and Sigma® CR Knee Systems, When Used in Fixed Bearing Primary Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
This study will compare two very similar designs of knee replacement device. One device (Sigma CR150) is a slightly modified version of the original (Sigma CR) and has been modified to enhance/accommodate higher flexion. The original device has been in widespread clinical use with excellent results since 1996 and this study will determine whether the design modifications of the newer device add further value. The newer device has been in clinical use with good short-term(unpublished) outcomes since becoming commercially available in January 2009.
Achieving higher knee flexion may be required for cultural reasons or by the increasingly younger, more active patient population undergoing knee replacement today. In addition to promoting flexion, it is also possible that this design change may help the knee replacement to last longer than traditional implants in patients who achieve higher flexion. Therefore, the study will compare the two devices in terms of survivorship, flexion and other measures of the success of a total knee replacement (range of motion, knee-related quality of life, activity and generic quality of life) over the short-term.
A minimum of one hundred and forty subjects (minimum 70 per group) with osteoarthritis and aged 50-75 years will be included at UK/international hospitals.
Study duration is 2 years and patients will complete standard knee outcome scores plus radiological evaluation.
Subjects would receive one of the study devices regardless of their involvement in the study, and apart from (possible)additional visits, x-rays and/or questionnaires, treatment and follow-up care will be as per the care they would receive outside of the study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Andhra Pradesh
-
Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500003
- Sunshine Hospitals
-
-
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 169608
- Singapore General Hospital
-
-
-
-
Fife
-
Kirkcaldy, Fife, United Kingdom, KY2 5AH
- Victoria Hospital
-
-
West Yorkshire
-
Halifax, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, HX3 0PW
- Calderdale Royal Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
i)Male or female subjects, aged between 50 and 75 years inclusive.
ii)Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.
iii) Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the hospital for all the required post-operative follow-ups.
iv) Subjects defined by the Investigator as ASA Grade I or II.
v) Subjects with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis.
vi) Subjects who require a primary total knee arthroplasty.
vii) Subjects who can achieve active flexion of 90 degrees.
Exclusion Criteria:
i) Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this clinical investigation.
ii) Subjects who are known drug or alcohol abusers or with psychological disorders that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
iii) Subjects who have participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last month.
iv) Subjects who are currently involved in any injury litigation claims.
v) Subjects with an anatomical limb alignment of above 20 degrees varus or valgus.
vi) Subjects with a fixed flexion deformity of over 20 degrees.
vii) Subjects with recurvatum (definition: hyperextension ≥ 5 degrees).
viii) Subjects who cannot flex their hip to 90 degrees.
ix) Subjects with a BMI of 35 or above.
x) Subjects defined by the Investigator as ASA Grade III-V.
xi) Subjects who are identified pre-operatively as having bone defects which require augmentation.
xii) Subjects who have previously undergone total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty, high tibial osteotomy, ligament reconstruction, ORIF or with previous fracture in the knee joint.
xiii) Subjects with primary or secondary diagnosis of inflammatory or traumatic arthritis.
xiv) Subjects who have undergone contralateral total knee arthroplasty during the previous 6 months.
xv) Subjects who in the opinion of the Investigator require patellar resurfacing.
Intra-operative exclusion criteria:
i) Subjects who have uncontained bone defects or defects bigger than 8 mm3 and/or require augmentation.
ii) Subjects who are not suitable to receive both the study and comparator devices.
iii) Subjects who require patellar resurfacing
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Sigma CR150
Sigma CR150 femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
|
Sigma CR150 femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Sigma CR
Sigma CR femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
|
Sigma CR femoral component used in combination with the Highly Polished Cobalt Chrome fixed bearing tibial tray and the Curved (XLK) polyethylene bearing (cemented, no patellar resurfacing).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Knees Who Survived at 2 Years Post-operative
Time Frame: 2 Years
|
The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 24-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no components revised for any reason) was censored at the time of last follow-up.
|
2 Years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Goniometer Measured Maximum Passive Flexion at 2 Years
Time Frame: Pre-operative baseline to 2 years
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 2 year goniometer-measured passive flexion.
A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg
|
Pre-operative baseline to 2 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Subscore - 1 Year
Time Frame: Pre-operative baseline to 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no pain) to 36 (extreme pain). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme pain) to 100 (no pain) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 36 = transformed score |
Pre-operative baseline to 1 year
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Subscore - 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no pain) to 36 (extreme pain). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme pain) to 100 (no pain) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 36 = transformed score |
2 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptoms Subscore - 1 Years
Time Frame: 1 years
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 year in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (always have symptoms). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (always have symptoms) to 100 (never have symptoms) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 36 = transformed score |
1 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore - 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (never have symptoms) to 28 (always have symptoms). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (always have symptoms) to 100 (never have symptoms) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 28 = transformed score |
2 years
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome - Activities of Daily Living Subscore - 1 Years
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Symptom Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 68 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 68 = transformed score |
1 year
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome - Activities of Daily Living Subscore - 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Daily Living Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 68 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 68 = transformed score |
2 year
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome - Sport and Recreation Subscore - 1 Years
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Daily Living Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 20 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 20 = transformed score |
1 year
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Sport and Recreation Subscore - 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Daily Living Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 20 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 20 = transformed score |
2 year
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome - Quality of Life Subscore - 1 Years
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 1 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Activities of Quality of life Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 16 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 16 = transformed score |
1 year
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome - Quality of Life Subscore - 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values at 2 years in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Quality of Life Subscore The subscore ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 16 (extreme difficulty). The subscore is then transformed into a 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty) scale. 100 - (score x 100) / 16 = transformed score |
2 years
|
Change From Baseline in Goniometer Measured Maximum Passive Flexion at 1 Year.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 1 year goniometer-measured passive Flexion.
A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg.
Passive flexion involves moving the leg through range of motion without active muscle contraction
|
1 year
|
Change From Baseline in Goniometer Measured Maximum Passive Extension at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 1 year goniometer-measured passive extension.
A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg.
Passive extension involves the leg being moved without active muscle contraction
|
1 year
|
Change From Baseline in Goniometer Measured Maximum Passive Extension at 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 2 year goniometer-measured passive extension.
A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg.
Passive extension involves moving the leg without active muscle contraction
|
2 year
|
Change From Baseline in Goniometer Measured Maximum Total Range of Motion at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 1 year goniometer-measured total range of motion.
A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg.
Total range of motion is the full distance the lower leg travels in relation to the upper leg.
|
1 year
|
Change From Baseline in Goniometer Measured Maximum Total Range of Motion at 2 Years.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Comparative evaluation of the change from baseline values in 2 year goniometer-measured total range of motion.
A goniometer is an instrument used to measure angles in degrees and captures the change in angle between the upper and lower leg.
Total range of motion is the full distance the lower leg travels in relation to the upper leg.
|
2 years
|
Number of Participants With Flexion Contracture at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 years
|
Summary of flexion contracture at 1 year time point.
Flexion contracture is a shortening of the muscles that prevents the leg from fully extending
|
1 years
|
Number of Participants With Flexion Contracture at 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Summary of flexion contracture at 2 year time point.Flexion contracture is a shortening of the muscles that prevents the leg from fully extending
|
2 years
|
Total Knee Society Score at 1 Year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Total Knee Society Knee Score change from baseline at 1 year The Total Knee Society Score is comprised of two scores: the Knee Score and the Function Score. Both have a 0-100 range. Sub-scales are combined to compute a total score of 100 The Total Knee Society Score is made up of pain, range of motion, alignment and stability subscores. An Excellent score is 80-100, a good score is 70-79, a fair score is 60-69 and a poor score is anything below 60. |
1 year
|
Total Knee Society Knee Score at 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Total Knee Society Knee Score change from baseline at 2 years The Total Knee Society Score is comprised of two scores: the Knee Score and the Function Score. Both have a 0-100 range. Sub-scales are combined to compute a total score of 100 The Total Knee Society Score is made up of pain, range of motion, alignment and stability subscores. An Excellent score is 80-100, a good score is 70-79, a fair score is 60-69 and a poor score is anything below 60. |
2 years
|
Anatomic Alignment Angle
Time Frame: 1 year time point
|
Anatomic angle measured at 1 year time point. If one draws a line from the center of the hip joint to the center of the ankle joint this is considered to be the mechanical axis of the femur. A line drawn through the center of the femoral shaft is the anatomic axis. The angle created at the intersection of these lines is referred to as the anatomic alignment angle. A normal angle is approximately 7-9 degrees "valgus" or slightly "knock-kneed". "Varus" angles are less common and are also referred to as "bow-legged". |
1 year time point
|
Anatomic Alignment Angle
Time Frame: 2 year time point
|
Anatomic angle measured at 2 year time point. If one draws a line from the center of the hip joint to the center of the ankle joint this is considered to be the mechanical axis of the femur. A line drawn through the center of the femoral shaft is the anatomic axis. The angle created at the intersection of these lines is referred to as the anatomic alignment angle. A normal angle is approximately 7-9 degrees "valgus" or slightly "knock-kneed". "Varus" angles are less common and are also referred to as "bow-legged". |
2 year time point
|
Alignment - Femoral Component to Anatomic Angle.
Time Frame: 1 year time point
|
Femoral component angle measured at 1 year time point.
This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head and a line across the bottom of the femoral implant (condyles).
|
1 year time point
|
Alignment - Femoral Component to Anatomic Angle
Time Frame: 2 year time point
|
Femoral component angle measured at 2 year time point.
This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head and a line across the bottom of the femoral implant (condyles).
|
2 year time point
|
Alignment - Tibial Component to Anatomic Angle
Time Frame: 1 year time point
|
Tibial component angle measured at 1 year time point.
This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head tibial implant.
|
1 year time point
|
Alignment - Tibial Component to Anatomic Angle
Time Frame: 2 year time point
|
Tibial component angle measured at 2 year time point.
This angle is measured between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head tibial implant.
|
2 year time point
|
Alignment - Femoral Component Flexion
Time Frame: 1 year time point
|
Femoral Component Flexion measured at 1 year time point.
This measures the angle between a line drawn though the center of the side of the femur and a line drawn across the top of the flat inner surface of the femoral component.
|
1 year time point
|
Alignment - Femoral Component Flexion
Time Frame: 2 year time point
|
Alignment - Femoral Component Flexion measured at 2 year time point.
This measures the angle between a line drawn though the center of the side of the femur and a line drawn across the top of the flat inner surface of the femoral component.
|
2 year time point
|
Alignment - Tibial Posterior Slope
Time Frame: 1 year time point
|
Tibial Posterior Slope measured at 1 year time point.
This angle is measured between a line through the center of the side of the tibia and the top flat surface of the tibial implant
|
1 year time point
|
Alignment - Tibial Posterior Slope
Time Frame: 2 year time point
|
Alignment - Tibial Posterior Slope measured at 2 year time point.
This angle is measured between a line through the center of the side of the tibia and the top flat surface of the tibial implant
|
2 year time point
|
Number of Subjects With Radiolucencies - Femoral Component
Time Frame: 6 to 12 week and 24 month intervals
|
The bone-implant interface at the femoral components were examined radiographically and radiolucencies were measured in millimeters. Radiolucent lines (RLLs) greater than 2mm are considered to be clinically significant. |
6 to 12 week and 24 month intervals
|
Number of Subjects With Radiolucencies - Tibial Component
Time Frame: 6 weeks to 24 months
|
The bone-implant interface at the tibial components were examined radiographically and radiolucencies were measured in millimeters. Radiolucent lines (RLLs) greater than 2mm are considered to be clinically significant. Radiolucent lines greater than 2mm are considered to be clinically significant. |
6 weeks to 24 months
|
Radiographic Evaluation of Maximum Flexion
Time Frame: 1 year time point
|
Maximum knee flexion measured radiographically at 1 year time point
|
1 year time point
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gautam Chakrabarty, FRCS Orth., Calderdale and Huddersfield Foundation NHS Trust
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CT07/04
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis
-
Sanford HealthActive, not recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Shoulder Osteoarthritis | Ankle Osteoarthritis | Wrist OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
University of EdinburghHospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Shoulder OsteoarthritisUnited Kingdom
-
Medical University of WarsawUnknownOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Glenohumeral OsteoarthritisPoland
-
Medical University of WarsawUnknownOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Glenohumeral OsteoarthritisPoland
-
University of California, San FranciscoStanford University; Robert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
University of VermontCompletedOsteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis Of HipUnited States
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRoyal Infirmary of EdinburghRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis | Shoulder OsteoarthritisUnited States, United Kingdom
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip Osteoarthritis
-
University Hospital, LilleCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNewton-Wellesley Hospital; The New England Baptist HospitalCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Hip OsteoarthritisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Sigma CR150
-
DePuy InternationalCompletedOsteoarthritis | Post-traumatic Arthritis | Gout | Pseudo-goutSwitzerland, Italy
-
DePuy InternationalTerminated
-
Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS TrustActive, not recruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeUnited Kingdom
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedOsteoarthritis, KneeUnited Kingdom
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedOsteoarthritisFrance, Switzerland, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesCompletedOsteoarthritisIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Ewha Womans UniversityCompletedOsteoarthritisKorea, Republic of
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedKnee OsteoarthritisUnited Kingdom
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedOsteoarthritis, KneeKorea, Republic of
-
University of AarhusRegionshospitalet Silkeborg; Gigtforeningen; ProtesekompagnietCompletedOsteoarthritisDenmark