Botox Versus Oxybutynin as First Line Treatment for the Poorly Compliant Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder

October 25, 2012 updated by: Sumit Dave, Lawson Health Research Institute

A Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Botulinum Toxin A and Standard Oxybutynin Therapy as First Line Treatment for the Poorly Compliant Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of Botulinum Toxin A as primary therapy for children with neurogenic bladder due to spina bifida and compare results with standard oral oxybutynin therapy. This study hopes to demonstrate that Botulinum Toxin A can maintain or improve bladder storage function without side effects associated with oxybutynin use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 20 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of spina bifida and neurogenic bladder
  • Performing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC)
  • Taking 0.3-0.4 mg/kg/day of oxybutynin for a poorly compliant bladder
  • Has not had previous bladder surgery
  • Has had a urodynamic or videourodynamic study done within the last 6 months
  • Upper motor neuron (UMN) type bladder demonstrated on last urodynamic study
  • Urodynamic study (UDS) showing either detrusor leak point pressure >40cm H2O; 30cm below capacity <60% of total bladder capacity, 20 cm capacity <70% of bladder capacity
  • Able and willing to complete CIC Diaries and Quality of Life Questionnaires
  • Consent and assent given to participate in trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of lung disease, recurrent aspiration or severe neurological impairment which may increase risk of Botox toxicity or anesthesia
  • Positive urine culture
  • Known allergy to Botox

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Oxybutynin
standard oral therapy
EXPERIMENTAL: Botulinum Toxin A injection
10 units/kg injected into the detrusor muscle using cystoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess urodynamic effects of intravesical botulinum toxin A injection to standard oral dose therapy
Time Frame: Primary outcomes will be assessed at 3 and 6 months

The following urodynamic parameters will be measured;

  1. Change in end fill pressure or detrusor leak point pressure (cm H2O)
  2. Change in 20 and 30 cm H2O below volumes expressed as percentage of bladder capacity
  3. Change in reflex volume (percentage of bladder capacity at which neurogenic detrusor overactivity starts)
Primary outcomes will be assessed at 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Calculate accrual rate
Time Frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Calculate cross over rate
Time Frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Calculate adverse event rates
Time Frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Compare the side effects of standard oral therapy compared to Botulinum toxin A injection
Time Frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Calculate drop out rate
Time Frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months
Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sumit Dave, MD, London Health Sciences Centre, Laweson Health Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurogenic Bladder

Clinical Trials on Oxybutynin

3
Subscribe