Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly (URGE) (URGE)

Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly

Urge urinary incontinence, characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major health issue for elderly women, as it is incredibly common and significantly impairs quality of life. Although anticholinergic medications are the most common therapy, the investigators are unable to predict an individual's response to a particular drug in terms of both effectiveness and side effects. Through genetic evaluation, the investigators have the potential to personalize and optimize drug therapy for millions of elderly women suffering from urge incontinence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Urge urinary incontinence (UUI), characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major public health burden to elderly women, given its high prevalence, impairment of quality of life, associated caregiver burden, and substantial economic costs. UUI is significantly more prevalent in older adults and disproportionately affects women, with a prevalence of 19% in community-dwelling women over 65 and 60-78% in long-term care female residents.

Anticholinergic medications are the most common first-line therapy for UUI. Although numerous trials have demonstrated that anticholinergics are efficacious for UUI, the response to these medications is variable, as their effectiveness is often limited by poor response or adverse events (AEs), such as cognitive impairment or constipation, which are particularly problematic in older adults. Furthermore, a comprehensive systematic review concluded that no one drug is definitively superior, leaving clinicians without any evidence to guide decision-making regarding drug choice. As a result, UUI pharmacotherapy is empiric and not personalized, even though it is clear that individual variations exist in both response and toxicity. The treatment of UUI is especially challenging in the geriatric population, given their higher risk for AEs, polypharmacy, and pharmacokinetic changes that occur with age. The ability to predict which elderly women with UUI will experience low efficacy or develop significant adverse events from anticholinergic medications would be a paradigm shift in the therapeutic practice to this highly prevalent and bothersome condition.

Pharmacogenetics may provide insight into how to predict response to anticholinergic UUI therapy. Research has already shown that genetic differences in drug metabolism impact a patient's drug response. For example, "fast metabolizers" may metabolize the drug so rapidly that therapeutic levels are never reached, limiting effectiveness. In contrast, "slow metabolizers" may develop high drug concentrations, resulting in significantly more AEs. While pharmacogenetic research exists for numerous classes of drugs, including anticoagulants, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors,14 beta-blockers, immunosuppressants and opioids, this type of translational research does not exist for anticholinergics for UUI. Thus, this proposed project represents a novel concept and unique opportunity to dramatically change UUI pharmacotherapy.

Fesoterodine is an ideal anticholinergic medication to launch a pharmacogenetic study in this field. Fesoterodine's active metabolite, 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), is metabolized by a well-characterized cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP2D6. The CYP2D6 gene has several genetic variants, which result in different metabolizer statuses ranging from poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), extensive metabolizers (EM), to ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). These different CYP2D6 profiles may be clinically important, as they may contribute to the variability in efficacy and AEs. In fact, pharmaceutical company data for fesoterodine demonstrated that PMs have a two-fold higher plasma concentration than EMs; however, no published data exist on how CYP2D6 metabolizer status correlates with clinical outcomes such as efficacy or AEs. The ability to use CYP2D6 metabolizer status to predict which individuals will experience low efficacy or develop AEs to fesoterodine, and to utilize alternative therapies in these women, would challenge existing therapeutic paradigms and would significantly advance clinical practice via a pharmacogenetic approach.

Specific Aim 1: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict efficacy during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. All subjects will be started on fesoterodine 4mg for 2 weeks followed by 8mg for 2 weeks. The primary outcome will be patient-reported treatment response based on a 4-point scale utilized in phase III clinical trials.8,9 We hypothesize that women who rapidly metabolize fesoterodine based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status are more likely to have low efficacy.

Specific Aim 2: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict moderate to severe adverse events during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. In the same study design as Aim #1, we will identify subjects with moderate to severe fesoterodine-related AEs. We hypothesize that women who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are more likely to have moderate to severe AEs.

Specific Aim 3: To utilize preliminary data from this pilot, proof-of-concept study to plan a future large-scale trial to predict outcomes of anticholinergic UUI therapy based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status. Data regarding efficacy rates, risk of moderate-severe AEs, and the impact of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on efficacy and AEs, in addition to information regarding recruitment, drop-out, and questionnaire burden, will critically inform the study design, outcome measures and sample size of future, definitive trials.

This proposal represents an innovative approach to pharmacotherapy for UUI, a highly prevalent condition with significant morbidity. Pharmacogenetics has tremendous potential to identify ideal candidates for anticholinergic UUI therapy and to distinguish individuals who may benefit from alternative treatment options. This pioneering pharmacogenetic research has the potential to lay the necessary groundwork for future long-term research which would optimize and personalize UUI therapy for millions of elderly women.

Design & Procedures:

Patient Population: All women aged 50 years or older who desire treatment for bothersome UUI will be approached for enrollment. Women with ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary will be included. Although women who have previously failed fesoterodine will be excluded, those who have failed other UUI anticholinergics remain eligible after a 2-week washout period.

Subjects with auditory or visual sensory impairment will be included. If visual impairment exists, the research coordinator will provide assistance to complete the necessary documents. However, those who are unable to complete the study-related items and visits, such as women with cognitive impairment, based on the Mini-Cog validated questionnaire will be excluded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • UNC-Chapel Hill, Dept of Ob/Gyn

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women ≥ 50 years
  • ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary
  • Urge-predominant incontinence, >50% of total incontinence episodes
  • No history of failure to fesoterodine
  • 2-week washout period if currently on an anticholinergic for UUI
  • Willingness to avoid off-protocol UUI therapy during the study period
  • Post Void Residual (PVR) <150 mL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to fesoterodine (e.g., bladder outlet obstruction, narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, severe hepatic or renal impairment)
  • Inability to complete study-related items and visits - i.e., cognitive impairment based on Mini-Cog test score (exclude if score of 0 or 1-2 (Abnormal))
  • Urinary retention requiring catheterization
  • Symptomatic, untreated urinary tract infection not resolved prior to starting fesoterodine
  • Botulinum toxin injection for UUI in the last year
  • Current therapy with peripheral or sacral neuromodulation
  • Neurologic conditions that may affect urinary function (stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease)
  • Women taking potent CYP3A4 inhibitors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Fesoterodine Fumarate
Participants will receive 4 mg of study drug for first 2 weeks, and then 8 mg of study drugs for 2 weeks.
FDA approved anticholinergic medication used for treatment of urge urinary incontinence
Other Names:
  • Toviaz

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage With Treatment Success
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Treatment Success (Yes/No) was defined by the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS). TBS is a 4-point scale which was dichotomized into Yes/No for the Treatment Success outcome. The scale asks participants to rate "My condition has been improved: 1= greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed, 4= worsened." If a participant responded 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved), they were considered as a "Yes" for Treatment Success. If a participant responded 3 (not changed) or 4 (worsened), then they were considered as a "No" for Treatment Success.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Outcome was defined as moderate to severe anticipated adverse events (AE) based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Each AE is graded 1-5 with Grade 1=mild AE, Grade 2=moderate AE, Grade 3=severe AE, Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling AE, grade 5=Death-related to AE. Any side effect grade >= 2 considered a moderate to severe AE. Anticipated AEs included dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, confusion, cognitive impairment, dry eyes, blurry vision, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, dyspepsia and urinary retention. Example: dry mouth grades per CTCAE: Grade 1=symptomatic without significant dietary alteration; unstimulated saliva flow > 0.2 mL/min; Grade 2=symptomatic and significant oral intake alteration; unstimulated saliva flow 0.1 to 0.2 mL/min; Grade 3=symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally; IV fluids, tube feedings or total parenteral nutrition indicated; unstimulated saliva < 0.1 mL/min.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer M Wu, MD, UNC-CH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urge Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Fesoterodine Fumarate

3
Subscribe