N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (NAC)

N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease - Reducing the Incidence of Daily Life Pain

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the drug N-Acetylcysteine on the frequency of pain in daily life in patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD).

Pain is an invalidating hallmark of this disease and has a considerable impact on the Quality of Life of patients and the medical health care system. Oxidative stress is hypothesized to play a central role in its pathophysiology. In pilot studies the administration of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) resulted in a reduction of oxidative stress. Moreover, administration of NAC seemed to decrease hospitalization for painful crises in a small pilot study in patients with SCD.

This study will be performed as a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial where patients will be treated with either NAC or placebo for a period of 6 months. The investigators expect that NAC can reduce the frequency of pain in patients with SCD, thereby improving their quality of life and participation in society.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Hopital Erasme
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Hopital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF)
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • CHU Brugmann
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Chu St. Pierre
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • UCL St. Luc
      • Liège, Belgium
        • CHR de la Citadelle
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academic Medical Center
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 AA
        • Erasmus Medical Center
      • The Hague, Netherlands, 2545 CH
        • Haga Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Guys' & St. Thomas Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 12 years or older
  • Sickle cell disease, either homozygous sickle cell disease (HbSS), compound heterozygous sickle cell disease (HbSC), HbSβ0 or HbSβ+ thalassemia
  • History of at least 1.0 painful crisis per year in the past 3 years (visit to medical facility is not required)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic blood transfusion or transfusion in the preceding 3 months
  • Painful crisis in the last 4 weeks (with respect to the moment of inclusion)
  • Pregnancy, breast feeding or the desire to get pregnant in the following 7 months
  • Known active gastric/duodenal ulcers
  • Hydroxycarbamide (HC) treatment with unstable dose in the last 3 months or started on HC shorter then 6 months prior to study
  • Known poor compliance in earlier trials regarding the completion of pain diaries
  • Insufficient compliance in run-in period
  • Known hypersensitivity to acetylcysteine or one of the other components of the study medication
  • Use of pain medication for sickle-cell related pains on more than 15 days per month in the past 6 months ('chronic pain').

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: N-Acetylcysteine
N-Acetylcysteine 600mg 1 oral tablet twice daily during 6 months
Other Names:
  • Acetylcysteine
  • Acetadote
  • Fluimicil
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo 1 oral tablet twice daily during 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence rate of SCD related pain in daily life per patient year
Time Frame: 6 months

The incidence of pain in daily life will be expressed as the number of pain days in relation to total follow-up time, and transformed to an event rate per patient year with a corresponding rate ratio and its 95% confidence interval.

A pain day will be defined as:

  • When the box "Yes, I have experienced pain" is checked in the daily pain diary.
  • Days with hospital admission for painful crisis will be included in the total number of pain days and in the total number of diary observation days, irrespective of pain diary reports on these dates.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The severity of SCD related pain in daily life, using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) in the study pain diary.
Time Frame: 6 months
The average intensity of pain indicated on pain days in daily life will be compared between the two groups. The intensity of pain will be calculated as the average pain score over all pain days, using the highest scores indicated per day (either score over night or over day). Hospital days will be excluded from the analysis, as these scores often have not been completed fully during admission and the analysis is targeted at pain in daily life. Pain scores will be considered as continuous data with a normal distribution.
6 months
The incidence rate per patient year of painful crises (episodes, based on pain diary observation)
Time Frame: 6 months

The number of patient-indicated painful crises in relation to total follow-up time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval. Also, the average number of crisis days per patient in relation to total follow-up time will be evaluated (including hospital admission days, see below).

A painful crisis will be defined as either (overlap is possible):

  • When the box "Yes, I was in a crisis" is checked in a daily diary.
  • Missing diary days that are immediately preceded and followed by crisis days or by hospital admission.
  • A visit or admission to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related pain, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics.
  • An acute chest syndrome
6 months
The incidence rate per patient year of days with painful crises (days, based on pain diary observation)
Time Frame: 6 months

The number of days with patient-indicated painful crises in relation to total follow-up time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval.

A painful crisis will be defined as either (overlap is possible):

  • When the box "Yes, I was in a crisis" is checked in a daily diary.
  • Missing diary days that are immediately preceded and followed by crisis days or by hospital admission.
  • A visit or admission to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related pain, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics.
  • An acute chest syndrome
6 months
The severity of painful crises. This will be defined using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) in the pain diary.
Time Frame: 6 months

The average intensity of pain indicated on crisis days in daily life will be compared between the two groups. The intensity of pain will be calculated as the average pain score over all crisis days, using the highest scores indicated per day (either score over night or over day). Hospital days will be excluded from the analysis, as these scores often have not been completed fully during admission and the analysis is targeted at pain in daily life. Pain scores will be considered as continuous data with a normal distribution.

Painful crisis definition as above.

6 months
The incidence rate per patient year of hospital admissions
Time Frame: 6 months

The number of sickle cell related hospital admissions in relation to total follow-up diary observation time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval.

Admissions will be verified using hospital medical records, if available. Hospital admission will be defined as:

• Every visit to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related disease, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics.

6 months
The incidence rate per patient year of hospital admission days
Time Frame: 6 months

The number of sickle cell related hospital admission days in relation to total follow-up diary observation time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval.

Admissions will be verified using hospital medical records, if available. Hospital admission will be defined as:

• Every visit to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related disease, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics.

6 months
Time in days to first painful crisis (as defined above)
Time Frame: 6 months
The time in days from randomization to first painful crisis (patient-defined) and hospital admission for painful crisis will be expressed in cumulative event rates, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
6 months
Time in days to first hospital admission for painful crisis (as defined above)
Time Frame: 6 months
The time in days from randomization to first painful crisis (patient-defined) and hospital admission for painful crisis will be expressed in cumulative event rates, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
6 months
The health-related Quality of Life, as measured by use of validated questionnaires.
Time Frame: 6 months
In adults this will be assessed with SF36-forms, a short-form health survey that has been proven to be valid and reliable in the black population.46 In children from 12 to 18 years old, we will use the PedsQL questionnaire, often used to assess quality of life in children, also validated in SCD patients
6 months
The SCD-related societal costs, assessed by a prospective cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: 6 months

The societal costs of pain care with the use of NAC, in the intervention group, will be compared to the societal costs of current pain care in the control group. Estimates of unit costs will be based on calculation of real costs of pain care.

Generated direct medical costs will be recorded in the case record forms and by means of the Medical Cost Questionnaire (see appendix). Indirect costs arising from losses in productivity will be assessed by means of the Productivity Cost Questionnaire (see appendix) and will be calculated by means of the friction cost method.

6 months
The tolerability of NAC, defined as the number of participants with adverse events.
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be assessed via the monthly adverse events reports. The frequency of registered adverse events and/or a serious adverse events will be reported per treatment arm, and compared between the two intervention groups.
6 months
The incidence rate per patient year of use of home pain medication (based on pain diary observation). This information will be recorded by subjects in their daily pain diary, including type and dosage of pain medication.
Time Frame: 6 months
The incidence rate of analgesic usage will be defined as the proportion of pain days with reported analgesic use on the total number of pain days (excluding observation days with no reported pain). This proportion will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval.
6 months
Incidence of SCD complications.
Time Frame: 6 months

The number of patients with sickle cell related complications (i.e. acute chest syndrome, stroke etc.) will be reported per treatment arm, and compared between the two intervention groups.

The related incidence of SCD complications;

  • Acute chest syndrome
  • Priapism
  • Hepatic sequestration
  • Splenic sequestration
  • Cerebrovascular accident
  • Leg ulcer
  • Symptomatic avascular osteonecrosis

These complications will be assessed monthly by using hospital medical records.

6 months
The changes in blood markers of oxidative stress, hemolysis, hypercoagulability, inflammation, erythrocyte adhesion and endothelial dysfunction
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Compliance of study medication; proportion of study medication used based on pill counts.
Time Frame: 6 months
Compliance of use of study medication will primarily be checked by pill counts (number administered versus number returned). Compliance will be expressed as the proportion of tablets remaining, compared to the number of tablets that should have been taken based on a prescription of 2 tablets per day and the total number of observation days per patient.
6 months
Compliance of study medication; N-acetylcysteine plasma concentrations
Time Frame: 6 months
We additionally aim to evaluate compliance by N-acetylcysteine plasma concentration measurements in blood samples drawn at T0, T3 and T6 in the intervention group, and assess mean change from baseline in the intervention group. This outcome may be used as alternative parameter for patient compliance if pill counts do not suffice.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Study Data/Documents

  1. Statistical Analysis Plan
    Information identifier: Version 7.0 - 5/31/2016

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe