Mind Body Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain

March 29, 2022 updated by: Paul Dougherty, DC, Canandaigua VA Medical Center

Mind Body Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study

This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of having a non-behavioral health provider deliver a combination of manual therapy (MT) and cognitive behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-p). In addition, we will evaluate differences in outcomes in patients undergoing the combined intervention of CBT-p and MT and those undergoing MT alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Given that this is a pilot study we will use simple descriptive statistics for patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI and baseline scores on outcome measures. In addition we will assess the inter-rater reliability of the scoring of the delivery of the CBT-p by the two trained practitioners utilizing kappa statistics. We will perform data analyses using SPSS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14620
        • Rochester Outpatient Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 69 years of age with CLBP who are
  • "high risk" for poor prognosis based on SBST
  • currently undergoing chiropractic care.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to either MT or CBT-p.
  • Patients who are currently undergoing CBT-p
  • who have been treated for substance abuse in the past year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Manual Therapy
Spinal Manipulative therapy (SMT) for the purpose of this study we will allow the use of other types of MT, including non-thrust spinal mobilization and flexion-distraction technique.
Manual Therapy Arm
Other Names:
  • Spinal Manipulative Therapy
  • Spinal Mobilization
  • Flexion Distraction Therapy
Experimental: Mind Body Intervention (MBI)
Mind Body Intervention will consist of a combination of the previously described "manual therapy" and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for pain (CBT-p). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for pain management has three basic components. The treatment rationale, coping skills training and application and maintenance of learned coping skills.
Manual Therapy Arm
Other Names:
  • Spinal Manipulative Therapy
  • Spinal Mobilization
  • Flexion Distraction Therapy
Combination of manual therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for pain.
Other Names:
  • Manual Therapy
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post baseline (immediately post intervention)
The VAS is a patient completed analogue measure that evaluates pain intensity on a 100 mm long horizontal line, which is anchored at each end with a statement representing the extremes of the dimension being measured. In this case the left hand side reads, "no pain" and the right hand side reads "worst pain possible". The VAS scale utilized will assess pain at the current time. The VAS has been established as a reliable, valid and generalizable measure that can be administered in a wide range of clinical and experimental settings.
Baseline and 6 weeks post baseline (immediately post intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Global Health Scale (GHS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post baseline (immediately post intervention)
Health outcomes assessment has advanced to a point where generic health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures are often used to examine the health status of populations and the effects of medical interventions. Generic HRQL profile measures, such as the SF-36 Health Survey, provide multiple health domains scores (e.g., physical function, mental health, pain, vitality, etc.), but not an overall index score. Patient reported outcome measurement information system has developed a quality of life tool that provides an overall index score for quality of life. The main advantage of the PROMIS measures over other static health status measures is that the PROMIS domain item banks and scores allow flexibility in administration using either targeted short forms or computerized adaptive testing. This form has recently been validated in comparison to the EuroQual.
Baseline and 6 weeks post baseline (immediately post intervention)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and post intervention
Cherkin et al, in the evaluation of a physician education program developed a patient satisfaction questionnaire which was found to be reliable and valid. The questionnaire utilized in this study will incorporate these same questions. Additional questions to be included focus on the burden of the data collection activities, and suggestions for subject recruitment.
Baseline and post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Dougherty, DC, Canandaigua VA Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MBI001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Lower Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Manual Therapy

3
Subscribe