Efficacy Assessment of Two Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens in Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery (EAPRTS)

November 18, 2013 updated by: Giordano Bruno Paiva Campos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Efficacy Assessment of Two Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens in Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery.

The study set out to evaluate the efficacy of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens in patients with facial fractures admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology services of the Onofre Lopes University Hospital attached to the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study set out to evaluate the efficacy of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens in patients with facial fractures admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology services of the Onofre Lopes University Hospital attached to the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.This clinical study was prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients underwent surgery for facial fracture reduction and fixation under general anesthetic. Prior to surgery, patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 patients each received 2g of Cefazolin (Cefazolin Sodium - Ampoule- 1g - Genéricos Brasil), administered intravenously but none was administered in the post-operative period. Group II patients received the same dose prior to the operation but in the post-operative period they also received 4 additional 1 g doses of Cefazolin intravenously, completing a 24 period of antibiotic prophylaxis. In the case of operations that lasted for more than 4 hours, an additional 1g dose was given.

The surgical operations involved intra and extra-oral interventions and when required internal rigid fixation was undertaken using titanium plates and screws. Patients were given advice on oral hygiene procedures to be followed in the post-operative period that included chlorhexidine (0.12%) oral rinses and care to be taken with the surgical wounds.

Post-operative follow up was conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks. The criteria used to determine the presence of infection were: a) pus drainage at the fracture site or in the vicinity of the surgical intervention site; b) increased swelling 7 days after the operation; c) presence of a fistula in the area of the surgical intervention or at the site of the fracture, with active drainage; d) other clinical features observed by the evaluator including typical signs of infection such as fever, edema, and localized redness.

Descriptive analysis was made of the independent variables, namely, age, sex, presence of systemic diseases, trauma cause, drug use (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, crack, cocaine , etc.), the time lapse between the trauma event and the surgical operation, length of the operation, and the measures adopted when infections were detected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande do Norte
      • Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, 59012-300
        • Recruiting
        • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology services of the Onofre Lopes University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adriano Germano, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giordano Campos, DDS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders
  • ASA I, II, III
  • have facial fractures, that request surgical treatement, and whitout infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pan-facial fractures
  • Or requiring surgery longer than six hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cefazolin
2g of Cefazolin, 20minutes before sugery. After surgery, 1g of cefazolin 06/06h.
Cefazolin, 2g/IV, prior to surgery, and after surgery recieved 4 aditional doses 1g/IV of Cefazolin.
Active Comparator: Cefazolin Single Dose
2g of Cefazolin, 20minutes before sugery. After surgery, no drugs.
Patients received 2g of Cefazolin (Cefazolin Sodium - Ampoule- 1g - Genéricos Brasil), administered intravenously but none was administered in the post-operative period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction of postoperative infection
Time Frame: 45 days
Post-operative follow up was conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks. The criteria used to determine the presence of infection were: a) pus drainage at the fracture site or in the vicinity of the surgical intervention site; b) increased swelling 7 days after the operation; c) presence of a fistula in the area of the surgical intervention or at the site of the fracture, with active drainage; d) other clinical features observed by the evaluator including typical signs of infection such as fever, edema, and localized redness.
45 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Adriano Germano, PhD, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ATB-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Fractures

Clinical Trials on Cefazolin

3
Subscribe