PSI for Bilateral Simultaneous TKA in Sever Varus

November 23, 2013 updated by: Mahmoud A Hafez, MSc Orth, Dip SICOT, FRCS Ed, MD, October 6 University

Bilateral Simultaneous Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Severe Articular Deformities

the Purpose of this study was to evaluate the short term outcome of patient specific instrument (PSI) in cases of bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis with sever varus

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The incidence of knee Osteoarthritis is variable and it is very high in Far East 47.0% and 70.2% in men and women respectively, while it is 17.2% and 82.8% in male and females respectively in Middle East. The incidence of bilateral knee Osteoarthritis is 48%. TKA is the standard treatment for Osteoarthritis. Many authors prefer bilateral simultaneous TKA can be performed for straight forward cases of Knee Osteoarthritis, although it has higher complication rate that could be discouraging.

Knee Osteoarthritis could be associated with articular deformities such as varus, valgus, flexion deformity and rarely recurvatum. These deformities could be associated with bone loss, ligamentous laxity, leg length discrepancy, bilateral shortening and disfigurement. These deformities need to be corrected during TKA and this make the procedure more difficult especially in severe cases with associated problems as described above. Some patients with knee Osteoarthritis present late when the condition becomes bilateral with sever articular deformity. Late presentation is a common feather in developing countries and low income countries and also in Middle and Far East.

With the progression of Knee Osteoarthritis patient's condition deteriorates gradually, both local and generally with increasing loss of cartilage and bone leading to deformities and joint laxity. This general condition with the increasing disability leads to high risk of associated obesity and comorbidities. The late presentation is multifactorial and complex to explain. There are obvious reasons such as economic constrain, late referral, lake of experienced surgeons and high demand and expectation such as full flexion in Middle and Far East. There are other unexplained reasons such as fear of surgeries, misconception about TKA and psychological factors.

Unilateral TKA for patients with bilateral knee Osteoarthritis with sever articular deformities is not beneficial to the patients, as it does not allow correction of the deformities and easier rehabilitation, and may not be satisfying for the patient because patient left with a straight knee after TKA and a deformed knee in the other side that leads to difficult rehabilitation and may force the TKA to get the same deformity to adapt to the other knee. With this dissatisfaction the patient may refuse to have the other knee done.

Bilateral simultaneous TKA in patient with sever articular deformities is beneficial to the patients as it allows correction of the deformities and easier rehabilitation.

However bilateral simultaneous TKA for such complex cases is a very demanding procedure and could be associated with a higher rate of complications such as fat embolism , mortality, infection, bleeding, deep venous thrombosis, and general complications.

PSI could be useful for bilateral simultaneous TKA because it eliminates the use of intramedullary guides and may reduce operative time, bleeding and risk of complications such as fat embolism or infection.

The aim of this study is to review the outcome of using PSI in bilateral simultaneous TKA for patient with sever articular deformities which is common in middle east region.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • October Six city, Egypt
        • October 6 University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Deformity ranging from 5 to 30 varus,
  • 10-40 valgus,
  • fixed flexion deformity from 5 to 50
  • wellness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • absence of deformities varus, valgus, or flexion deformity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TKA using PSI
Total Knee Arthroplasty using Patient Specific Instrument
A special software with the ability to perform 3D planning including sizing, alignment, bone cutting, positioning of implants, simulation & PSI designing and PSI production
Other Names:
  • PSI
EXPERIMENTAL: 2 TKA using conditional technique.
Total Knee Arthroplasty using conditional technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
functional score
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Blood transfusion rate
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks
complication rate
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks
hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks
Operative time
Time Frame: during surgery
during surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohamed El Sayed, Dr, Bone and Joint Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 28, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 28, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Patient specific instrument

3
Subscribe