Molecular Phenotyping in Predicting Response in Patients With Stage IB-III Esophageal Cancer Receiving Combination Chemotherapy

January 16, 2018 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Pilot Study of Correlation Between Molecular Phenotype and Response to Two Independent Treatment Regimens, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel vs. 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy in Patients With Localized Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

This randomized pilot phase II trial studies how well molecular phenotyping works in predicting response in patients with stage IB-III esophageal cancer who are receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel or oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil. Studying the genes in a patients tumor cells before and after chemotherapy may help in understanding if there are specific features of the tumor cells that make a person more or less likely to respond to treatment and how these features may be affected by treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate gene and micro ribonucleic acid (miRNA) expression levels in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma prior to receiving chemotherapy and identify relative expression differences between patients responding and not responding to treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil (fluorouracil) and oxaliplatin as measured by fluorodeoxyglucose F-18 ([18F] FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the impact of treatment on expression patterns of both genes and miRNAs in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma following treatment with either carboplatin and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, and identify expression patterns associated with treatment response and resistance as assessed by (18F) FDG-PET.

II. To evaluate the expression patterns of genes and miRNAs in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma prior to and following a full neoadjuvant combined-modality treatment program with either carboplatin and paclitaxel or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin chemotherapy plus radiation, and identify relative expression differences between patients achieving a pathologic complete response and patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I:

INDUCTION: Patients receive carboplatin (IV) and paclitaxel intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle for two cycles (total of 6 weeks).

CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) intravenously once weekly for five weeks throughout the duration of their radiation which is daily (Monday through Friday). This will be given in combination with radiation therapy to a total of 50.4Gy using 180cGy fractions.

ARM II:

INDUCTION: Patients receive mFOLFOX6 where they get oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and then 5FU at 2400 mg/m2 IV to be administered over a 46 hour period. This is repeated every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (total of 6 weeks).

CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive chemoradiation with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 2 weeks for a total of 3 cycles (6 weeks) as well as 5FU 300 mg/m2/day over 96 hours via continuous infusion each week of radiation for a total of 6 weeks. This will be given in combination with radiation therapy to a total of 50.4Gy using 180cGy fractions.

SURGERY: In both arms, approximately 4-10 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy, patients undergo esophagectomy at the discretion of the treating team.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then periodically thereafter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5065
        • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed localized (T1N1-3M0 or T2-4NanyM0, stage IB-III) Siewert type 1 or type 2 esophageal adenocarcinoma that is amenable to surgical resection as determined by a thoracic surgeon and for which all disease (primary tumor and involved lymph nodes) can be treated with radiation, as determined by a radiation oncologist
  • Patients may not have received any prior chemotherapy, biologic therapy or radiation therapy for management of their disease; chemotherapy or biologic therapy administered for treatment of another primary malignancy are permitted if treatment was greater than 5 years ago
  • Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2
  • Patients must have a life expectancy of > 3 months, in the opinion of and as documented by the investigator
  • Hemoglobin >= 10.0 g/dl
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL
  • Platelet count >= 100,000/mcL
  • Total bilirubin within normal institutional limits
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) =< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) =< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
  • Serum creatinine within normal institutional limits OR creatinine clearance >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal (as calculated by Cockcroft-Gault)
  • Patients must have an avid primary tumor with an standardized uptake value (SUV) of >= 5 on baseline (18F) FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging
  • Men must agree to use adequate contraception (double barrier method of birth control or abstinence) 1 week prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation and for 1 month after completing combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation; should a male patient's female partner become pregnant or suspect that she is pregnant while her partner is participating in this study, the treating physician should be informed immediately
  • Patients must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
  • This study will be limited to enrollment of Caucasian males only

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are receiving any chemotherapy, biologic therapy, radiation therapy or any investigational agent
  • Patients with metastatic disease
  • Patients with a history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to platinums, taxanes or fluoropyrimidines
  • Patients who have previously received radiation therapy to the chest or abdomen such that there would be overlap between the previous and current radiation field
  • Patients with uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) whom are not receiving antiretroviral therapy
  • Patients with another malignancy within the past 5 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (paclitaxel, carboplatin, radiation therapy, surgery)

INDUCTION: Patients receive chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Patients receive carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day treatment cycle for two cycles (total of 6 weeks).

CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive carboplatin (AUC=2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) intravenously once weekly for five weeks throughout the duration of their radiation which is daily (Monday through Friday).

SURGERY: Approximately 4-10 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy, patients undergo esophagectomy at the discretion of the treating team.

Correlative studies
Undergo radiation therapy
Other Names:
  • Cancer Radiotherapy
  • Irradiate
  • Irradiated
  • Irradiation
  • RT
Given IV or IVPB
Other Names:
  • Anzatax
  • TAX
Given IV or IVPB
Undergo esophagectomy
Experimental: Arm II (combination chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery)

INDUCTION: Patients receive mFOLFOX6 where they get oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and then 5FU at 2400 mg/m2 IV to be administered over a 46 hour period. This is repeated every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (total of 6 weeks).

CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: Patients receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 2 weeks for a total of 3 cycles (6 weeks) as well as 5FU 300 mg/m2/day over 96 hours via continuous infusion each week of radiation for a total of 6 weeks.

SURGERY: Approximately 4-10 weeks after completion of chemoradiation therapy, patients undergo esophagectomy at the discretion of the treating team.

Correlative studies
Undergo radiation therapy
Other Names:
  • Cancer Radiotherapy
  • Irradiate
  • Irradiated
  • Irradiation
  • RT
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Other Names:
  • CF
Undergo esophagectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Expression Differences in Individual Genes and Gene Profiles Between Patients Responding and Not Responding to Treatment, as Assessed by (18F) FDG-PET
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline gene profiles will be compared for 10 (18F) FDG-PET responders vs. 15 (18F) FDG-PET non-responders per treatment regimen using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the false discovery rate (FDR) p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value < 0.05). Top genes identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models.
Baseline
Relative Expression Differences in Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles Between Patients Responding and Not Responding to Treatment, Assessed by (18F) FDG-PET
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline microRNA profiles will be compared for 10 (18F) FDG-PET responders vs. 15 (18F) FDG-PET non-responders per treatment regimen using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value < 0.05). Top microRNAs identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models.
Baseline
Biological Pathway Perturbation Upon Exposure to Chemotherapy
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Predefined signatures of biological pathway activities will be evaluated in order to identify pathway perturbation upon exposure to chemotherapy. Significant pathway modulations upon brief exposure will then be evaluated for association with clinical response using non-parametric tests such as the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In all cases, statistical correction to account for multiple hypothesis testing will be employed and pathways with a false discovery rate of 10% or lower will be considered as significant.
Up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Chemotherapy Specimens of Individual Genes and Gene Expression Profiles
Time Frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Changes in baseline and post-treatment gene expression levels will be calculated between (18F) FDG-PET responders and non-responders, filtering for expression level changes of >= 0.20. Differences in expression level change per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value < 0.05). Top genes identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict responsiveness or resistance to each individual treatment regimen.
Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Chemotherapy Specimens of Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles
Time Frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Changes in baseline and post-treatment microRNA levels will be calculated between (18F) FDG-PET responders and non-responders, filtering for expression level changes of >= 0.20. Differences in expression level change per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test and p-values will be corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating FDR p-value (filtering on a FDR p-value < 0.05). Top microRNAs identified will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict responsiveness or resistance to each individual treatment regimen.
Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Relative Expression Differences in Baseline Individual Genes and Gene Expression Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline gene expression profiles for 8 pathologic complete responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen using a t-test will be compared. Top genes will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Baseline
Relative Expression Differences in Baseline Individual microRNAs and microRNA Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline microRNA profiles for 8 pathologic complete responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen using a t-test will be compared. Top microRNAs will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Baseline
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction Gene Expression Levels/Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Changes in baseline and post-treatment gene expression level/profiles will be compared between 8 pathologic responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen, filtering for expression levels changes of 0.20 and above. Differences in expression level changes per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test. Top genes will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Relative Expression Differences Between Baseline and Post-induction microRNA Levels/Profiles Between Patients Achieving and Not Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response Following Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Changes in baseline and post-treatment microRNA level/profiles will be compared between 8 pathologic responders vs. 17 patients not achieving a pathologic complete response per treatment regimen, filtering for expression levels changes of 0.20 and above. Differences in expression level changes per treatment regimen will be calculated using a t-test. Top microRNAs will be tested in combination for their sensitivity and specificity using logistic regression models to predict achievement of a pathologic complete response vs. patients not achieving a pathologic complete response.
Baseline to post-induction (36-43 days)
Occurrence of Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity Per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment
Toxicities will be summarized as the percentage of patients experiencing each type and grade of event according to treatment group. Patients who receive at least one dose of treatment will be included in the analysis.
Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Eads, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IIIA Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

3
Subscribe