Venous Thromboembolism in Renally Impaired Patients and Direct Oral Anticoagulants (VERDICT)

In renally impaired patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), standard-of-care (SOC) anticoagulation, i.e. heparins-vitamin K antagonists (VKA), at therapeutic dosage is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications compared to patients with normal renal function. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) have been shown to be at least as effective and safe as SOC in VTE treatment. But in the clinical trials, moderate renally impaired patients were poorly represented and patients with severe renal insufficiency not at all. So no dose reduction was considered.

Surprisingly, DOAs have been approved for VTE treatment in moderate and severe renally impaired patients. There is need to evaluate a reduced dose of DOAs for VTE treatment in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency.

We plan to evaluate reduced doses of 2 DOAs (apixaban, rivaroxaban) compared to SOC in VTE patients with moderate or severe renal insufficiency in terms of net clinical benefit (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) at 3 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In renally impaired patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), standard-of-care (SOC) anticoagulation, i.e. heparins-vitamin K antagonists (VKA), at therapeutic dosage is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications compared to patients with normal renal function. These patients represent more than 20% of the VTE population in clinical practice. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) have been shown to be at least as effective and safe as SOC in VTE treatment. But in the clinical trials, moderate renally impaired patients were poorly represented (<10%) and patients with severe renal insufficiency not at all. So no dose reduction was considered.

The new DOAs have also been developed for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). Patients including in AF trials are generally older and more prone to present renal impairment (>20%) than in VTE trials. So a reduced dose of DOAs was evaluated and shown to be at least as effective as, and safer than VKA in the subgroup of patients with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance between 30 to 50 ml/min).

Surprisingly, DOAs have been approved for VTE treatment and SPAF in moderate and severe renally impaired patients (creatinine clearance between 15 to 30 mL/min). Moreover, patients have to receive a reduced dose of DOAs for SPAF but a full dose of DOAs for VTE that could be associated with an increased bleeding risk, as suggested by some subgroup analyses. So, there, there is need to evaluate a reduced dose of DOAs for VTE treatment in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance between 15 to 50 mL/min).

Apixaban and rivaroxaban appear to be the best candidates since:

  • both are approved in France in VTE patients
  • they have mixed pathway of elimination (hepatic and renal)
  • they have several other pharmacological similarities and they respective clinical trials have shown similar efficacy and safety profiles when compared with SOC for VTE treatment.
  • they do not need to be preceded by initial parenteral heparins on the contrary to dabigatran and edoxaban. This allows evaluating the impact of DOAs in renally impaired patients independently from the initial heparins effect
  • a reduced dose regimen is available and approved in AF
  • the evaluation of 2 DAOs allows evaluating the concept of this new class in renally impaired VTE patients independently from the pharmaceutical companies.

Finally we plan to evaluate reduced doses of 2 DOAs (apixaban, rivaroxaban) compared to SOC in VTE patients with moderate or severe renal insufficiency in terms of net clinical benefit (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) at 3 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

203

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Agen, France
        • CH d'Agen-Nérac
      • Amiens 1, France, 80054
        • CHU Amiens
      • Angers 9, France, 49933
        • CHU Angers
      • Besancon, France, 25030
        • CH Besancon
      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU de Bordeaux
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • CHU La Cavale Blanche Brest
      • Brest, France
        • HIA de Brest
      • Castelnau Le Lez, France, 34170
        • CHU Castelnau-le-Lez
      • Chartres, France
        • CH Louis Pasteur - Chartres
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHU Clermont-Ferrand
      • Dijon, France, 21034
        • CHU Dijon
      • Grenoble 9, France, 38043
        • Hôpital La Tronche Grenoble
      • Ivry sur Seine, France, 94200
        • Hôpital Charles Foix - APHP Ivry sur Seine
      • Limoges, France, 87000
        • Chu Limoges
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • CHU Lyon
      • Lyon, France
        • HCL - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
      • Montpellier 5, France, 34295
        • CHU Montpellier
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes - Hopital Hotel Dieu
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Bellier
      • Nice, France, 06003
        • CHU Nice
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • HEGP - APHP Paris
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • Hôpital Louis Mourier- APHP Paris
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU de Rouen
      • Saint Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU Saint Etienne
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091
        • CHU Strasbourg
      • Toulon, France, 83056
        • CH Toulon
      • Toulon, France
        • HIA de Toulon
      • Toulouse 9, France, 31059
        • CHU Toulouse
      • Valenciennes, France
        • CH de Valenciennes
    • Boulevard Georges Besnier
      • Arras, Boulevard Georges Besnier, France, 62022
        • CH Arras
    • Hôpital Trousseau
      • Tours, Hôpital Trousseau, France, 37550
        • Chu Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a moderate renal insufficiency defined by a creatinine clearance between 30 to 50 ml/min (Cockcroft and Gault formulae) or a severe renal insufficiency (between 15 to 29 ml/min)
  • Patients with acute objectively confirmed symptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) (with or without deep-vein thrombosis), planned to be treated for at least 3 months
  • Patients >18 years
  • Life expectancy more than 3 months
  • Social security affiliation
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for anticoagulants other than VTE
  • Active bleeding or a high risk of bleeding contraindicating anticoagulant treatment; a systolic blood pressure of more than 180 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of more than 110 mm Hg
  • Anticoagulation for more than 72 hours prior to randomization
  • Chronic liver disease or chronic hepatitis
  • Patient at high risk of bleeding
  • Creatinine clearance <15 ml/min or end stage renal disease or indication for extra-renal dialysis
  • Need for concomitant anti-platelet therapy other than aspirin 75-325 mg per day. However concomitant treatment with aspirin is discouraged in this population at bleeding risk.
  • Concomitant use of a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP3A4) (e.g., a protease inhibitor for human immunodeficiency virus infection or azole-antimycotics agents ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole) or a CYP3A4 inducer (e.g., rifampin, carbamazepine, or phenytoin),
  • Active pregnancy or expected pregnancy or no effective contraception
  • Any contraindication listed in the local labeling of UFH, LMWH or VKA or oral anticoagulant.
  • Cancer-associated VTE requiring long-term treatment with LMWH
  • Life expectancy of less than 3 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: DOA : Direct Oral Anticoagulants

The experimental group receiving DOA regimens: patients will be secondarily randomly assigned within DOAs group between:

  • Apixaban (Eliquis® tablet) 10 mg bid for 7 days then 2.5 mg bid for 3 months
  • Rivaroxaban (Xarelto® tablet) 15 mg bid for 21 days then 15 mg od for 3 months.
Direct Oral Anticoagulant
Other Names:
  • Eliquis®
Direct Oral Anticoagulant
Other Names:
  • Xarelto®
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: SOC : Standard Of Care
The control group receiving the standard of care (SOC), i.e. heparins/VKA regimen. Patients will receive the current recommended therapy: subcutaneous or intravenous UFH/VKA in case of severe renal insufficiency and subcutaneous LMWH/VKA in case of moderate renal insufficiency for at least 5 days. VKA will begin concomitantly and continue for 3 months.
Standard Of Care
Standard Of Care
Other Names:
  • vitamin K antagonists

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non inferiority of reduced doses of DOAs
Time Frame: Month 3
To demonstrate that reduced doses of DOAs (rivaroxaban or apixaban) are non-inferior to standard of care (heparins/VKA) on the net clinical benefit (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) in renally impaired patients suffering from an acute VTE.
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding events
Time Frame: Month 3
To demonstrate the non--inferiority of reduced dose of DOAs on the risk of major bleedings.
Month 3
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) events
Time Frame: Month 3
To demonstrate the non--inferiority of reduced dose of DOAs on the risk of recurrent VTE.
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MISMETTI Patrick, MD, CHU Saint Etienne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Apixaban

3
Subscribe